Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 114,008 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ESSEX SIMS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. An appellate court reviews a district court's

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 114,304 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JEFFREY COLLIER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. An appellate court reviews a district court'

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 114,468 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ALAN KINGSLEY, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. K.S.A. 22-3504(1), which governs co

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE Anne King believed that her ex-husband, Corey King, was not doing his fair share in the care of their children. Frustrated, she vented on Facebook. Doc. 13 ¶ 14. That post led to her arrest. Ms. King alleges that her ex-husband and his friend, Trey Burgamy, were responsible for her unconstitutional arrest and thus she filed this action alleging claims pursuant to

952 So.2d 1008 (2006) Betty Jo WALKER, Appellant v. McCLENDON CARPET SERVICE, INC., Appellee. No. 2005-CA-01065-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. November 21, 2006. Rehearing Denied March 27, 2007. Michael P. Younger, Brandon, attorney for appellant. Mark D. Morrison, Ridgeland, attorney for appellee. Before MYERS, P.J., SOUTHWICK

549 F.3d 1269 (2008) Lynn BUCK; Alma Rosa Silva-Banuelos; Denis Doyon; Lucy Gilster (by her next friend, Jennie Lusk); Brian Haney; Alicia Kisner (by her next friend, Lisa Kisner); Michael Kisner; Lane Leckman; Maria Santelli; Susan Schuurman; Christina Maya Trafton; Curtis Trafton; Nick Wechselberger, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE; Mayor Martin Chavez, in his individual capacity; Deputy Police Chief Ray Schultz, in his individual

65 Md. App. 56 (1985) 499 A.2d 209 WILLIAM R. GRECO v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 171, September Term, 1985. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. November 6, 1985. Certiorari Granted January 30, 1986. William W. Cahill, Jr. (Thomas C. Morrow, William K. Meyer and Weinberg and Green, on brief), Baltimore, for appellant. Ga

327 S.E.2d 449 (1985) STATE of West Virginia v. Larry Dale FRANKLIN. No. 16142. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. March 1, 1985. *451 Gilbert L. Hall, Charles Town, for appellant. James E. Garvin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charleston, for appellee. *450 NEELY, Chief Justice:

537 So.2d 1355 (1989) Robie L. KIGHT, Jr. & Rhonda C. Kight v. SHEPPARD BUILDING SUPPLY, INC. No. 58136. Supreme Court of Mississippi. January 25, 1989. *1356 Billy W. Keyes, Peter L. Corson, Ann E. Wedding, Keyes, Moss, Piazza & Woods, Jackson, for appellant. Thomas W. Crockett, David C. Dunbar, Watkins, Ludlam &a;

413 S.E.2d 137 (1991) THOMPSON DEVELOPMENT, INC., Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. The KROGER COMPANY, Defendant Below, Appellee. No. 20052. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted September 24, 1991. Decided December 18, 1991. *138 Diana M. Savit, Silver, Freedman & Taff, Washington, D.C., Charles

701 So.2d 774 (1997) Wanda M. JONES as Mother and Natural Guardian of Alexander C. Jones, Ditra S. Cooley, and Derrick L. Cooley, the Minor Heirs at Law of Willis Cooley, Deceased; and Jimmy H. Cooley as Administrator of the Estate of Willis Cooley, Deceased, v. JAMES REEVES CONTRACTORS, INC., Howard Industries, Inc., and Foil, Wyatt, & McKewen, P.A. No. 93-CA-01139-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississipp

12 Md. App. 157 (1971) 277 A.2d 635 ANTHONY VERNON, JR. v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 495, September Term, 1970. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Decided June 2, 1971. *159 The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and MOYLAN and POWERS, JJ. David J. McDonnell, with whom were Allen, Thieb

19 Md. App. 253 (1973) 310 A.2d 817 JACKSON D. PENNINGTON v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 251, September Term, 1973. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Decided October 26, 1973. *255 The cause was argued before ORTH, C.J., and MORTON and GILBERT, JJ. Sheldon H. Braiterman for appellant. <

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 93-CA-01139-SCT WANDA M. JONES AS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF ALEXANDER C. JONES, DITRA S. COOLEY, AND DERRICK L. COOLEY, THE MINOR HEIRS AT LAW OF WILLIS COOLEY, AND JIMMY H. COOLEY AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIS COOLEY, DECEASED v. JAMES REEVES CONTRACTORS, INC., HOWARD INDUSTRIES, INC., AND FOIL, WYATT, & MCKEWEN, P.A. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/20/93 TRIAL

1 iHALL, Justice.* This suit arises out of a hospital’s termination of a cardiovascular surgeon’s staff *735privileges for incompetence and unprofessional misconduct. The surgeon, Dr. Pren-tiss E. Smith, sued the hospital, Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc., d/b/a Our Lady of the Lake Regionál Medical Center (“OLOL”); various members of t

6 Md. App. 419 (1969) 251 A.2d 622 JAMES LESLIE PRESLEY v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 314, September Term, 1967. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Decided March 26, 1969. The cause was argued before ANDERSON, MORTON, ORTH, and THOMPSON, JJ. *423 G. Denmead LeViness and Thomas W. Jamison, I

124 Ga. App. 318 (1971) 184 S.E.2d 213 WEST et al. v. BAUMGARTNER; and vice versa. WEST et al. v. PADGETT; and vice versa. WEST et al. v. PADGETT; and vice versa. 45908, 45909, 45910, 45911, 45912, 45913. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Argued January 8, 1971. Decided July 7, 1971. Rehearing Denied July 27,

639 So.2d 730 (1994) Prentiss E. SMITH, M.D. v. OUR LADY OF THE LAKE HOSPITAL, INC., d/b/a Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center, Kenneth C. Cranor, M.D., A. Foster Sanders, M.D., Donald R. Cowick, M.D., W. Howard Kisner, M.D., M.J. Rathbone, Jr., M.D., Louis P. Laville, Jr., M.D., B. Eugene Berry, M.D., W. Redfield Bryan, M.D., Mr. Sidney Duplessis, Mr. W.H. LeBlanc, Jr., Mr. Roland Toups, Mr. Robert Davidge, and Others Whose Identities a

523 So.2d 983 (1988) C.L. THORNHILL, et al. v. SYSTEM FUELS, INC., et al. No. 56166. Supreme Court of Mississippi. April 6, 1988. *984 Don Barrett, Barrett, Barrett, Barrett & Patton, Lexington, Norman Gene Hortman, Jr., Gibbes, Graves, Mullins, Bullock & Ferris, Laurel, Richard D. Foxworth, Foxworth & Shepard, Columb

The question for decision is whether the bank's janitor is an employe as ruled by the Commission, or whether he is an independent contractor as argued by the bank. It is not necessary to decide whether we may look to the record of the evidence, the review being on certiorari, for the reason that if we concede for the purpose of the present controversy everything which the bank asserts that the evidence shows in its behalf, the judgment must still be affirmed. The janitor during the rem