⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Gilbert C. Alston”

State v. Alstonpublic domain
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2018-03-07 · Published · cited 6× · 811 S.E.2d 747; 422 S.C. 270
CHIEF JUSTICE BEATTY : **274 Stepheno Jemain Alston was tried in absentia and convicted by a jury of trafficking in cocaine. The trial judge sentenced Alston to twenty-five years' imprisonment. On appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed Alston's
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997-04-22 · Published · cited 8× · 962 F. Supp. 616; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5632; 74 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 408; 1997 WL 208867
962 F.Supp. 616 (1997) Sam ALSTON, John Banchi, Edward Champion, George A. Freeman, Leroy L. Gilbert, Jr., Arthur G. Hopson, David C. Loder, Andrew J. McNeal, Allyn Mozitis, Emanuel Scott, Joe Scates, and Paul R. String, Plaintiffs, v. ATLANTIC ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 96-5453. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 22, 1997.
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2023-07-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GILBERT G. MENNA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0509-MTZ ) ANDREW J. WEIDHAAS, JOANNE ) WEIDHAAS, and MIRADX, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
People v. Higaredapublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1994-05-05 · Published · cited 16× · 24 Cal. App. 4th 1399; 29 Cal. Rptr. 2d 763; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3263; 94 Daily Journal DAR 6172; 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 456
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1401 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1402 OPINION A jury convicted appellant of nine counts of robbery (Pen. Code,
People v. Wimberlypublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1992-04-09 · Published · cited 5× · 5 Cal. App. 4th 439; 6 Cal. Rptr. 2d 800; 92 Daily Journal DAR 4944; 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3131; 1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 481
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 441 OPINION Dispositive of this appeal are two related Proposition 1151 preliminary hearing issues: (1) was the officer who testified to hearsay statements qualified to do so and (2) were those multiple hearsay statements admissible pursuant to
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990-09-04 · Published · cited 7× · 397 S.E.2d 447; 197 Ga. App. 29; 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 1162
197 Ga. App. 29 (1990) 397 S.E.2d 447 GILBERT et al. v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. APAC-GEORGIA, INC. v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. A90A0859, A90A0860. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided September 4, 1990. Rehearing Denied September 24, 1990. Jones & Granger, Gary F. Easom, C. Michael Hardman, for appellant (
Walton v. Magnopublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1994-06-14 · Published · cited 12× · 25 Cal. App. 4th 1237; 30 Cal. Rptr. 2d 815; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4466; 94 Daily Journal DAR 8233; 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 606
OPINION Defendant and appellant Philip L. Magno appeals from an order granting a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict brought by plaintiffs and respondents Curnie L. Walton and Neda S. Walton after a jury verdict in favor of Magno on the issue of liability. The trial court ordered a trial on the issue of damages. We conclude the appeal is taken from a *Page 1239 nonappealable order and there is no final judgment. Accordi
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021-01-21 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1127, 19-1491, 19-1523, 19-1897 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Alston Campbell, Jr., Alston Campbell, Sr., Willie Carter, and William M
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019-02-05 · Published · cited 0× · 434 P.3d 1066
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON " c:7 3 (f) --ACD In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of) No. 76497-7-1 74, 4
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2021-08-10 · Published · cited 21× · 862 S.E.2d 295; 312 Ga. 350
312 Ga. 350 FINAL COPY S20G1419. ALSTON & BIRD, LLP v. HATCHER MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS, LLC. PETERSON, Justice. We interpret statutory text in the light of the text’s broader context, both within and without the statute. But we consider that context only for the light that it sheds on the meaning of the relevant text; it does not empower us to delete some words and insert others. And so when we interpret unambiguous statutory text that appears not to serve the p
Alston v. Alstonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993-07-23 · Published · cited 63× · 629 A.2d 70; 331 Md. 496; 1993 Md. LEXIS 108
ELDRIDGE, Judge. The issue before us concerns the propriety of a marital property monetary award granted in a divorce proceeding. The General Assembly has enacted a statutory scheme relating to property matters upon divorce, Maryland Code (1984, 1991 RepLVol.), §§ 8-201 to 8-205 of the Family Law Article. Pursuant to these provisions, the mechanism by which the spouses' propert
Alston v. Kingpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998-10-14 · Published · cited 2× · 157 F.3d 1113; 1998 WL 713794
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Washington Alston filed this action against Scott King, who is the Mayor of Gary, Indiana, the City of Gary, Indiana, and the Gary Sanitary District (collectively, “the defendants”) on February 13,1996. He alleged claims based upon retaliatory discharge, violation of procedural due process, conspiracy to violate constitutional rights and breach of contract. The district court ultimately entered a jud
Alston v. Kingpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998-10-14 · Published · cited 6× · 157 F.3d 1113; 14 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 784; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 26063
157 F.3d 1113 14 IER Cases 784 Washington C. ALSTON, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Scott L. KING, individually and in his professionalcapacity, Gary Sanitary District, an executivedepartment of the City of Gary, City ofGary, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 97-3760. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Sept. 14,
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2014-12-17 · Published · cited 0× · 453 S.W.3d 480; 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 13440; 2014 WL 7174359
OPINION Opinion by Justice Moseley At their inception, the dealings giving rise to the lawsuit appealed here involved a controversy over improvements to real estate in Dallas County, Texas. 1 The owners of the real estate, attorney Chris L. Gilbert and his wife, Dawn E. Gilb
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2015-11-10 · Published · cited 0×
VIRGINIA: In the Court of Appeals of Virginia on Tuesday the 10th day of November, 2015. Peter Weidlein, Appellant, against Record No. 2145-14-4 Circuit Court No. CL 2014-5297 Mimi C. Weidlein,
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2015-12-08 · Published · cited 0×
VIRGINIA: In the Court of Appeals of Virginia on Tuesday the 8th day of December, 2015. Peter Weidlein, Appellant, against Record No. 2145-14-4 Circuit Court No. CL 2014-5297 Mimi C. Weidlein,
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2019-05-16 · Published · cited 2× · 390 F. Supp. 3d 645
DAVID C. NORTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The following matter is before the court on defendant Delta Speir Plantation LLC's ("Delta") partial motion to dismiss, ECF No. 26. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants in part and denies in part the motion. I. BACKGROUND In 2010, defendant James S. Shaw ("Shaw") allegedly requested assistance from plaintiffs Raymon
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006-12-14 · Published · cited 0× · 639 S.E.2d 649; 361 N.C. 166; 2006 N.C. LEXIS 1304; 2006 WL 3843598
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th day of March 2006 by Defendant (Gilbert T. Bland) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th day of December 2006."
State v. Alstonpublic domain
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998-05-29 · Published · cited 6× · 711 A.2d 363; 312 N.J. Super. 102
711 A.2d 363 (1998) 312 N.J. Super. 102 STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Herron ALSTON, Defendant-Appellant. STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Reginald DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued March 23, 1998. Decided May 29, 1998. *3
Alston v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995-07-25 · Published · cited 3× · 339 Md. 306; 662 A.2d 247; 1995 Md. LEXIS 102
RODOWSKY, Judge. The petitioner, David L. Alston (Alston), was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of, inter alia, second degree murder that had been submitted on the depraved heart theory. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed. Alston v. State, 101 Md.App. 47, 643 A.2d 468 (1994). Alston petitioned this Court to review “[wjhether the evidence was insufficient to sustain the charge of