Cases

[Cite as Ward v. Ward, 2020-Ohio-3415.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY JOSEPH J. WARD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 9-19-24 v. SHANNON L. WARD, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Marion County Common Pleas Court Family Di

ROLAND L. BELSOME, Judge. | ¶ Defendant, Leonard Gibson, appeals his conviction for two counts of attempted armed robbery with a firearm, one count of armed robbery with a firearm, and three counts of aggravated kidnapping. For the following reasons, we affirm and remand for resentencing. *695 FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

719 F.Supp.2d 1031 (2010) Ernest GIBSON, Minor, by his guardian ad litem, Susan M. Gramling, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN CYANAMID CO., Armstrong Containers, Inc., E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Co., Millenium Holdings LLC, NL Industries, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Co., The Sherwin Williams Co., and Milwaukee County Department of Health and Services, Defendants. Case No. 07-C-864. United States District Court, E.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMY J. ST. EVE, District Judge: PlaintifflCounter-Defendant Triumph Packaging Group (“Triumph”) and Third-Party Defendants Randall Cecola (“Cecola”), DTG Services Group, Inc. (“DTG”), Kallahan Marketing Group, Inc. (“KMG”), Darwin Technology (“Darwin”), and Tesoro Realty Group LLC (“Tesoro Realty”) (collectively, the “Third-Party Defendants”) move to dismiss Defendant

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Petitioner-Appellant Sharieff Imani Sal-lahdin, formerly Michael Pennington, 1 appeals from the district court’s denial of his federal habeas corpus petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his petition, Sallahdin lodged eleven challenges to his first degree murder conviction and death s

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. An Oklahoma jury convicted Petitioner Michael Edward Hooper on three counts of first degree murder in the shooting deaths of his twenty-three-year-old former girlfriend, Cynthia Jarman, and her two children, Tonya Kay Jarman and Timmy Glen Jarman. The jury imposed the death sentence for each count. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Petitioner’s convictions and sentences on direct appea

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. Alfred Brian Mitchell, a state prisoner sentenced to death, appeals the disposition of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons set out below, we affirm the district court’s ruling that Mr. Mitchell’s conviction was not constitutionally infirm, but we reverse the district court’s decision upholding the imposition of th

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Billy Ray Battenfield, an Oklahoma state prisoner convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to death, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and reverse and remand with instructions to grant the writ as to Battenfield’s death sentence, subject to the state district court cond

*833MEMORANDUM OPINION PETER J. WALSH, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court is the motion (Doc. # 5) of defendant Robert Schoeberl (“Defendant”) to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Montgomery Ward Holding Corp. (“Montgomery Ward”) or alternatively, for a more definite statement. Defendant filed a $1,430,000.00 proof of claim in Montgomery Ward’s bankruptcy cas

628 A.2d 1256 (1993) Eugene and Cobelena BISSON v. Kelly WARD. No. 92-426. Supreme Court of Vermont. June 11, 1993. *1257 Timothy W. Shanley, Montpelier, for plaintiffs-appellees. Mary C. Welford and Gail Sophrin, Vermont Legal Aid, Inc., Rutland, for defendant-appellant. Before ALLEN, C.J., and GIBSON, DOOLEY, MORS

MEMORANDUM JOYNER, District Judge. This personal injury action is brought by a minor, Danron Gibson (“Danron”), by and through his parent and natural guardian, Da-nier Gibson (“Danier”), and by Danier in her own right, against the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak” or “Defendant”). Plaintiffs seek damages resulting from an incident in which Danron allegedly suffered electrical burns on prop

115 B.R. 532 (1990) In re Paul WARD. William McHENRY, John Wiersma, Thomas Brennan, and David Knapp, Appellants, v. Paul WARD, Appellee. Bankruptcy No. SG84-01934, No. G89-40621CA. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.D. March 27, 1990. *533 *534 William F. McNally, Kevin B. Even

539 So.2d 459 (1989) James GIBSON, Petitioner, v. Garth COURTOIS and Sally Courtois, Respondents. No. 70921. Supreme Court of Florida. March 2, 1989. Gwynne A. Young of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A., Tampa, for petitioner. Don Paul Greiwe, Sarasota, for respondents. KOGAN, Justice. We have for review the decision of t

272 B.R. 836 (2001) In re MONTGOMERY WARD HOLDING CORP., a Delaware corporation, et al., Debtors. Montgomery Ward Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. Robert Schoeberl, an individual, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 97-1409(PJW). Adversary No. A-99-560. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. January 16, 2001. *837

470 F.Supp.2d 485 (2006) D.R. WARD CONSTRUCTION CO., et al., Plaintiffs v. ROHM AND HAAS CO., et al., Defendants. No. MDL NO. 1684. No. 2:05-CV-4157-LDD. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 30, 2006. *486 *487 *488

677 F.Supp. 1092 (1988) Ella WARD, et. al., Plaintiff, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., et. al., Defendants. Goldie STEVENS, Plaintiff, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., et. al., Defendants. Earl G. MEYER, Plaintiff, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 87-K-850, 87-K-1162 and 87-K-1577. United States District Court, D. Colorado. <

CHABOT, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency in Federal estate tax against petitioner in the amount of $46,331.82. After a concession by petitioner, the issue for decision is whether decedent materially participated in the operation of her farm witjiin the meaning of section 2032A(b)(l)(C)(ii)1 so as to permit her estate to qualify for the benefits of the special use valuatio

In proceedings for the judicial settlement of intermediate accounts, appellants, income beneficiaries under two trusts, appeal from so much of each of two decrees of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County, both dated October 26, 1976 and made in separate proceedings, as (1) held that the provisions of EPTL 11-2.1 (subd [e]) controls the treatment of stock distributions accrued after June 1, 1965 and (2) denied the application of their attorneys for legal

03/26/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 12, 2024 Session MANDI GREGORY, ACTING THROUGH MELISSA STEWART, CONSERVATOR v. PEACHTREE SETTLEMENT, a/k/a SETTLEMENT FUNDING, LLC ET AL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardin County No. 21-CV-15

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KIM R. GIBSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Appellant’s Notice of Appeal of the Bankruptcy Court’s July 13,2015, memorandum opinion (ECF No. 1-2) and order (ECF No. 1-3) granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment. Appellant appealed the Bankruptcy Court’s decision on July 23, 2015, (ECF No. 1), and fil