Cases

326 F.Supp.2d 1060 (2003) VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P., a California Limited Partnership, Defendant. No. 01-CV-09871 RGK(RCX). United States District Court, C.D. California. June 23, 2003. *1061 *1062

OPINION AND ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS, District Judge: When an employer requires an employee to attend alcohol counseling and treatment sessions as a condition of keeping her job, must the employer compensate the employee for the time she spends in counseling and treatment? That is the central question in this lawsuit, in which Plaintiffs Gwendolyn A. Gibbs and Lanita Drew claim that the failure of their e

603 F.3d 71 (2010) GLOBAL NAPS, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, Appellant, v. VERIZON NEW ENGLAND INC. d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, Appellee, Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy; Paul B. Vasington, in his capacity as Commissioner; James Connelly, in his capacity as Commissioner; W. Robert Keating, in his capacity as Commissioner; *72 Deirdre K

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION TO DISMISS ROBERT J. FARIS, Bankruptcy Judge. The plaintiff in this adversary proceeding, Dane Field, is Judith Lynn Gibbs’ bankruptcy trustee. The trustee claims that defendant Bank of America, N.A. (BANA), improperly foreclosed a mortgage made by Ms. Gibbs. The trustee’s complaint asserts violations of the power of sale in the mortgage, Hawaii’s nonjudicial fo

248 F.Supp.2d 468 (2003) VERIZON MARYLAND INC., f/k/a BELL ATLANTIC-MARYLAND, INC. Plaintiff, v. RCN TELECOM SERVICES, INC., f/k/a RCN Telecom Services of Maryland Inc., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.S-99-2061. United States District Court, D. Maryland, Northern Division. March 5, 2003. *472 James P. Garland, Miles and Stockbridge

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge LUTTIG and Judge KING joined. *186 OPINION MICHAEL, Circuit Judge. Frances Darcangelo filed this case in Maryland state court against Veri

133 Cal.Rptr.2d 258 (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 160 DEPARTMENT OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendant and Appellant. No. G029912. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three. April 28, 2003. Rehearing Denied May 28, 2003. *259 Swerd

Present: Lemons, C.J., Mims, Powell, Kelsey, McCullough, and Chafin, JJ., and Millette, S.J. DONNA KINSEY, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 200703 CHIEF JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS JULY 15, 2021 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ROCKINGHAM COUNTY Bruce D. Albertson, Judge In this appeal, we consider whether the Circuit

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DIANDRE WILLIS, § § No. 253, 2022 Defendant Below, Appellant, § § v. § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Appellee.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MARTIN J. SIEGEL, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : C.A. No. 2024-0146-LWW : CANTOR FITZGERALD, L.P. and : HOWARD LUTNICK, : : Defendants. :

671 F.Supp.2d 256 (2009) Stephanie CATANZARO, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., Trans Union, LLC and Verizon New England, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-10555-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 1, 2009. *257 Kenneth D. Quat, Quat Law Offices, Cambridge, MA, for Plaintiff.

WOOD, Chief Judge. The backdrop for this appeal is the world of automotive dealerships. But we are not concerned with the cars themselves. Instead, the controversy before us has to do with the management of the data those dealerships need in order to run an efficient business. In an effort to keep track of such vital business matters as accounting, payroll, inventory, sales, parts, service, financ

MEMORANDUM BLAKE, District Judge. On June 21, 2002, a consolidated and renewed motion for remand filed in the Pinney, Farina, Gilliam, Gimpelson, and Naquin actions in this multidistrict litigation was denied.1 I held that federal question jurisdiction supported removal based on the substantial federal question doctrine. In re Wireless Tel. Radio

OPINION BERZON, Circuit Judge: Like many state, local, and territorial jurisdictions, Guam has struggled for years with chronic budget deficits. Guam settled on a unique solution to its financial problems: It refused to refund over-withheld income taxes, using the money to fund government spending. Confronted with meritorious and uncontested claims for t

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-2259 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KASHAWN MORROW, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RONALD L. LANGSTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N19C-09-060 JRJ ) EXTERIOR PRO SOLUTIONS, ) INC. d/b/a DRY TECH ) WATERPROOFING SOLUTIONS, ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 22-0832 Filed July 26, 2023 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JERMAINE GREGORY MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Jeffrey D. Bert, Judge. Jermaine Miller appeals his criminal convictions. AFFIRMED. Jamie Hunter of D

GORMAN, J. [¶ 1] David L. Scott Jr. appeals from an award of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Pelletier; HO) granting him specific loss benefits for the amputation of his finger but permitting Fraser Papers, Inc., and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., to offset incapacity benefits paid after his injury but before the amputation. Scott contends that Fraser is not entit

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1155 KEVIN C. ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF MARSHFIELD; ROCCO LONGO, individually; MICHAEL A. MARESCO, in his official capacity; and JOHN E. HALL, in his official capacity and individually, Defendants-Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge This matter came before the Court on January 26, 2015, on Zipcar’s motion to dismiss the complaint. The' Court has carefully considered the parties’ arguments, and now DENIES Zipcar’s motion, for the reasons set forth below. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Gabriela Bayol is a resident of Daly City, Californ