Cases

250 P.3d 734 (2010) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joshua David GESS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07CA1998. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. V. April 29, 2010. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing June 10, 2010. *735 John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Clemmie Parker Engle, Assistant Attorne

GOLDEN, Justice. [¶ 1] In this negligence case brought against the City of Cheyenne and two of its employees pursuant to the Wyoming Governmental Claims Act, Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 1-39-101 through 121 (LexisNexis 2009), we accepted the following two certified questions from the district court: 1. Whether, in a cause of action arising under the Wyoming Governmental Claims Act (WGCA), Wyoming Statute §§ 1

952 F.Supp. 1529 (1996) Barbara GESS, et al., Joseph Givens, et al., Patrick G. Roberts, et al., Teresa Fowler, et al., David Barber, et al., Jay Dehaai, et al., Cheryl Pretiger Toms, et al., Alphonso Barnes, et al., Joseph Warrick, et al., Connie Mullen, et al., Donald Gregory Sharpe, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civil Action Nos. 93-D-0913-N, 93-D-1140-N, 93-D-1391-N to 93-D-1395-N, 94-D-0326

THORNBERRY, Senior Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Dr. Walter Burgess, a veterinarian, brought this action against Colorado Serum Company in Alabama state court. He alleged that he suffered injuries as a result of Colorado Serum’s failure to warn of the dangers posed to humans by accidental injection of brucellosis vaccine. Color

JUSTICE HOBBS delivered the Opinion of the Court. T 1 This appeal concerns the historical beneficial consumptive use quantification of an 1872 irrigation right in a change of water right and augmentation plan proceeding involving water diverted from West Plum Creek in the South Platte River system, Water Division No. 1. Sedalia Water and Sanitation District ("Sedalia") is the current owner of a portion of that

Opinion by JUDGE DAILEY T1 Defendant, Howell Franklin Roberts, III, appeals the judgments of conviction entered upon jury verdicts finding him guilty of violating the Colorado Organized Crime Control Act (COCCA), §§ 18-17-1011 to ~109, C.R.S$.2012, conspiracy to commit computer crime (two counts), conspiracy to commit theft, conspiracy to commit forgery, computer crime (two counts), theft (four counts), forge

CHIEF JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. T1 This case requires us to clarify the process for invoking one's rights under the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act ("the UMDDA" or "the Act"), §§ 16-14 101 to -108, C.R.S. (2014). When prisoners strictly comply with the UMDDA's procedural requirements, the Act mandates that they be brought to trial on pending charges within 182 days of the

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

Opinion by Judge GRAHAM. T1 Defendant, Shawn Robert Adolf, appeals the judgment of conviction entered after the district court denied his request to dismiss the charges against him under the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act, sections 16-14-101 to -108, C.R.S.2011 (UMDDA). We affirm. I. Background T2 On May 29, 2008, defendant was charged with (1) possession of

764 F.Supp. 1412 (1991) Charles P. HUGHES, Plaintiff, v. Harlan JOHNSON; George McLachlan; Anthony J. DiCola; Johnson, McLachlan and DiCola, a Colorado general partnership; Davis Realty, a Colorado corporation; William R. Davis; and The First National Bank in Lamar, a national banking association, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 90-N-1782. United States District Court, D. Colorado. Jun

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

Opinion by Judge BERNARD. ¶ 1 This appeal analyzes four issues. The first concerns the intersection of mental illness and the right of defendants in criminal cases to represent themselves in trials, such as the one that was held in this case. On the one hand, the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause dictates that defendants who are so mentally ill that they do not understand the proceedings or are unable to assist their attorneys ar

425 F.Supp.2d 859 (2006) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Sretta Reese, Bonnie Centers, Fran Howard, & Melinda Cochran Intervening Plaintiffs, v. PHYSICIAN SERVICES, P.S.C., Defendant. No. CIV.A. 5:05-393-JMH. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, At Lexington. April 6, 2006. *860 Gwendolyn Young

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

212 B.R. 851 (1997) In re Thomas L. KOLENDA and Lisa M. Kolenda, Debtors. Michael J. ANNESE, Appellant, v. Thomas L. and Lisa M. KOLENDA, Appellees. No. 1:97-cv-409, Bankruptcy No. HG-94-81748. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 18, 1997. Paul A. Pianto, Paul Pianto Law Offices, Owosso, MI, for appellant. Daniel B. Gess

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge' INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Matthew Rolph (“Plaintiff’), a male and former student enrolled at Hobart and William Smith Colleges (“HWS” or “the Colleges”), was expelled from that school after having been found to have violated the school’s , Sexual Misconduct Policy by having non-consensual sex with a female classmate. Plain

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION- TO SUPPRESS AND ON THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR A PROCEDURAL ORDER GENE CARTER, Chief Judge. I. Defendant has been indicted for possession with intent to distribute in excess of five grams of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(l)(B)(iii) and for aiding an abetting such possession in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2. In Count I

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Exclude Certain Evidence, filed August 17, 2018 (Doc. 236)("MIL 1"). The Court held a hearing on September 14, 2018. The primary issue is whether evidence of land use by other than Plaintiff Pueblo of Jemez after 1848 -- the year when the Pueblo Indians can under United States jurisdiction -- is

311 F.Supp.2d 1048 (2004) NOBODY IN PARTICULAR PRESENTS, INC., Ogden Resurrection Project, Inc., Swank Management, Inc., and N.I.P.P., LLC, Plaintiffs, v. CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., SFX Entertainment, Inc., d/b/a Clear Channel Entertainment, Clear Channel Broadcasting Inc., Jacor Broadcasting of Colorado, Inc., Citicasters Co., Citicasters Licenses, Inc., and Tsunami Communications, Inc., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 01 N