Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gertrude v. Mejia”
Cornett v. Sheldonpublic domain
894 F.Supp. 715 (1995) Delco L. CORNETT, Plaintiff, v. Seymour SHELDON, Weyman Carey, Vincent J. Cuttita, Douglas Kellner, Ferdinand C. Marchi, Paul Mejias, George M. Spanakos, Gertrude Strohm, and Kathleen Wagner, Defendants. No. 94 Civ. 6621 (JGK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 8, 1995. *716 Domenick Crisp
Coto v. New York City Board Of Electionspublic domain
97 F.3d 680 Dinorah COTO, David Fernendez, Ann Gandolfo, Robert Moore,Anna Moore, Louis Campbell, Luciano Navarro, SusanDougherty, and William Hinckley,andRobert DiCarlo, Candidate for the Republican Nomination forState Senator from the 23rd Senate District,Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, Paul Mejias, President,Frederick Umane, Secretary, Weyman A. Carey, DouglasKellner, Ferdinand C.
Hirschfeld v. Spanakospublic domain
104 F.3d 16 Abraham HIRSCHFELD and Hirschfeld for Congress CitizensCommittee, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.George SPANAKOS, Seymour Sheldon, Weyman Carey, Vincent J.Cuttita, Douglas A. Kellman, Ferdinano C. Marchi, PaulMejias, Gertrude Strohm, Vincent J. Vellella, KathleenWagner, individually and in their capacity as members of theBoard of Elections of the City of New York and City of NewYork, Defendants-Appellees.
Coto v. New York City Board Of Electionspublic domain
101 F.3d 803 Dinorah COTO; David Fernendez; Ann Gandolfo; RobertMoore; Anna Moore; Louis Campbell; Luciano Navarro;Susan Dougherty; William Hinckley; and Robert DiCarlo,Candidate for the Republican Nomination for State Senatorfrom the 23rd Senate District, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; Paul Mejias, President;Frederick Umane, Secretary; Weyman A. Carey; DouglasKellner; Ferdinand
Brock v. Sandspublic domain
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BLOCK, District Judge: Plaintiff Thomas Brock (“Brock”) brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking declaratory and injunctive relief regarding the constitutionality of certain aspects of the nominating process used in New York City community school board elections. Presently before this Court is Brock’s motion brought by order to show cause
Gelb v. Board of Elections in the City of New Yorkpublic domain
950 F.Supp. 82 (1996) Irving GELB, Plaintiff, v. The BOARD OF ELECTIONS IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK and George M. Spanakos, Seymour Sheldon, Weyman A. Carey, Vincent J. Cuttita, Douglas A. Kellner, Ferdinand C. Marchi, Paul Mejias, Gertrude Strohm, Vincent J. Velella, Kathleen M. Wagner, Defendants. No. 94 Civ. 0013 (SS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 2, 199
Hirschfeld v. Spanakospublic domain
MESKILL, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal by Abraham Hirschfeld and Hirschfeld For Congress Citizens Committee (Hirschfeld) from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Kaplan, J., dismissing their remaining claim against the New York City Board of Elections (Board) for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Appellants claim they were damaged by the Board’s attempts to ke
Kowsh v. Board of Elections of City of New Yorkpublic domain
99 F.3d 78 Walter KOWSH, Jr., Betty Gonzalez, Kerry Birmingham, StephenO'Keefe, Peter D. Stranis, James Villafane, Bettyna S.Ramirez, Carlos Louis, Ana V. Ayazo, Galina Rubenstein,Vladimir Rubinstein, Olga Sidlar, Julio C. Ramirez, MariaSharoubim, Ellen Sidlar, Clemencia E. Ramirez, Hilda R.Lopez, Marilyn Gabriel, Nancy Shaw, Christopher S. Midget,Marianne T. Midgett, Howard M. Groudan, James G. Lecakes,Adela Garcia, Her
Rockefeller v. Powerspublic domain
78 F.3d 44 Larry ROCKEFELLER; Mary Parrish; Lugenia Gordon; HelenDalley; Betsy Webster; Betsy M. Blattmachr;Nancy Burner; and Cornelius P. Dugan,Plaintiffs-Appellees,Steve Forbes, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee,v.William D. POWERS, Chairman, New York Republican StateCommittee; New York Republican State Committee,Defendants-Appellants,New York State Board of Elections; Owen T. Smith; CarolBerman; Evel
Rockefeller v. Powerspublic domain
909 F.Supp. 863 (1995) Larry ROCKEFELLER; Holace Moranci; Neil Moranci; Donna Moranci; Mary Parrish; Lugenia Gordon; Helen Dalley; Betsy Webster; Betsy M. Blattmachr; Nancy Burner and Cornelius P. Dugan, Plaintiffs, v. William POWERS, Chairman, New York Republican State Committee; New York Republican State Committee; New York State Board of Elections; Owen T. Smith, Carol Berman, Evelyn J. Aquila, and Helena Moses Donohue, Commissioners, New York
Mulholland v. Careypublic domain
BLOCK, District Judge. Presently before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs are members of the Independence Party *167of New York from Kings County and seek to preclude the New York City Board of Elections (“Board of Elections”) from removing the names of six candidates from the ballot for the Independence Party primary election to
Rockefeller v. Powerspublic domain
WINTER, Circuit Judge. The instant appeal involves Judge Korman’s order that the defendants place on the Republican presidential primary ballot in the 9th, 15th, 18th, and 24th New York congressional districts, the names of delegates committed to vote at the Republican National Convention for intervenor Forbes. Judge Korman based this order on his conclusion that New York ballot access requirements place a substantial burden
Coto v. New York City Board of Electionspublic domain
OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur, bound as I am by the, precedent of Powell v. Power, 436 F.2d 84 (2d Cir.1970), although the irregularities here were so gross as to call the flat statements in that precedent into serious question. However, to erode Powell, even in cases as Jraught with irregularity as these, would put the federal courts in the extremely difficult positi
Coto v. New York City Board of Electionspublic domain
PER CURIAM: This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of record from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and was argued by counsel. ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the order of the district court be and it hereby is REVERSED. On October 1, 1996, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New Y
Adams v. Colorado Department of Social Servicespublic domain
824 P.2d 83 (1991) Lula ADAMS, Avelino Alvarez, Isabelle Archuletta, Julian Baker, Donna Barger for Lori Barger, Emily Bell, David Bennett, Clara Bonger, Paul Boston, Jessie Boyd for Bonnie Boyd, Pinya Breyman, Jeanette Buttz, Constance Carey, Mary Cleveland, Annie Chilcote, Pearl Colegrove, Marjorie Collard, Carl Courts, Imogene Davis, Lois Davis, Charles DiDuglielmo, Gladys Ellis, Alfred Feeruz, Anna L. Fisher, Edna Fisher, Gilbert Gallegos, Annie Garc
Kowsh v. Board of Elections of New Yorkpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Plaintiffs Walter Kowsh, Jr., et al., appeal from so much of a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Jack B. Weinstein, Judge, as denied their motion for an injunction requiring defendant Board of Elections *79of the City of New York (the “Board”) to place the name of plaintiff Julio C. Ra
D'Angelo v. Velellapublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT William J. Garry, J. Petitioner moves for an order; (1) Declaring Ronald James D’Angelo to be the Republican Commissioner of the Board of Elections in the City of New York from Kings County and directing the Board of Elections in the City of New York to place Ronald James D’Angelo on the pay roster of said Board of Elections as a Commissioner, and
Smilo v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: May 15, 2023 ************************* GERTRUDE SMILO, Administratix * of the estate of JOSEPH G. SMILO, * PUBLISHED deceased, * * Petitioner, * No. 18-1585V * v.
United States v. Keith McGillpublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM: In November 2000, a grand jury returned a 158-count superseding indictment against sixteen defendants. The indictment alleged that, during the late 1980s and throughout the 1990s, those defendants conspired to run a large-scale and violent nareotics-distribution business centered in Washington, D.C. The de
Gelb v. Board of Elections in City of New Yorkpublic domain
888 F.Supp. 509 (1995) Irving GELB, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS IN the CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants. No. 94 Civ. 0013 (SS). United States District Court, S.D. of New York. March 24, 1995. *510 *511 Irving A. Gelb, New York City, pro se. Paul A. Crotty, Corp. Counsel of City