Cases

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge: This is a drug conspiracy case in which the main issue is sufficiency of evidence of participation in the conspiracy. I. FACTS This case was tried and the jury convicted. We therefore report the facts based on the evidence introduced at trial. Herrera-Gonzalez w

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Jose Gustavo Herrera-Valdez was prosecuted for illegal reentry after being deported. Before trial, he filed a motion to disqualify Judge Der-Yeghiayan from presiding over his prosecution because the judge served as the District Counsel for the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) at the time Herrera-Valdez was deported. He also filed a motion to

GOULD, Circuit Judge, with whom TALLMAN and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, join, Concurring: Our per curiam opinion for the court affirms the district court’s decision that Gerardo Esparza-Herrera’s prior conviction for violating A.R.S. § 13-1204(A)(11), based on his guilty plea, does not qualify as a “crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(l)(A)(ii) for purposes of enhancement. Under our precedent there see

PER CURIAM: Gerardo Jesus Herrera (“Gerardo Herrera”) brought a § 1983 claim against two San Antonio police officers and three employees of the Bexar County District Attorney’s Office. Gerardo Herrera alleged that his due process rights were violated when he was arrested and incarcerated for several days for a crime that he did no

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL GERARDO COLÓN APELACIÓN MEJÍAS procedente del Tribunal de Apelado Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de v. KLAN202400245

BEVAN, Justice I. NATURE OF THE CASE Joseph Herrera ("Herrera") appeals from his conviction for second-degree murder after a second trial. On appeal, Herrera argues that: (1) the State vindictively prosecuted him by adding a sentencing enhancement; (2) the district court erred when it failed to conduct a sufficient inquiry into his request for s

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 44596-2016 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Boise, June 2018 Term ) v. ) Filed: September 7, 2018 ) JOSEPH DUANE HERRERA

EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Gerardo Hernandez-Rodriguez appeals the district court’s application of a sixteen-level “crime of violence” sentencing enhancement based on his prior Louisiana aggravated battery conviction. Addressing the question we left open in United States v. Herrera-Alvarez, 753 F.3d 132, 142 n. 5 (5th Cir.2014), we conc

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00062-CR Gerardo Tomas Rivas § From Criminal District Court No. 4 § of Tarrant County (1215971D) v. § March 14, 2013 § Per Curiam The State of Te

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00063-CR Gerardo Tomas Rivas § From Criminal District Court No. 4 § of Tarrant County (1215973D) v. § March 14, 2013 § Per Curiam The State of Te

NUMBER 13-11-00011-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG GERARDO LEAL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691 (Fla.1990); Floyd v. State, 569 So.2d 1225 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2912, 115 L.Ed.2d 1075 (1991); Brown v. State, 206 So.2d 377 (Fla.1968); Street v. State, 592 So.2d 369 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 599 So.2d 658 (Fla.1992).

02-12-062, 063CR

02-12-062, 063CR

JUDITH C. HERRERA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Defendants Cervantes Agribusiness' and Cervantes Enterprises, Inc.'s ("Cervantes Defendants") joint Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 233]. Plaintiffs1 are United States citizens or lawful permanent residents who were given hiring priority

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 06-1754, 06-2380 & 06-2821 U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. G ERARDO R ECENDIZ, A RMANDO N AVAR, and M ARCO T HOMAS, Defendants-Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinoi

ORDER Adan Herrera pleaded guilty without a plea agreement to conspiracy to possess with intent to deliver and possession with intent to deliver more than two kilograms of cocaine and was sentenced to 60 months’ imprisonment. Herrera filed a timely notice of appeal, but his counsel has moved to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because counsel’s supporting brief is facial

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 07-30490 v.  D.C. No. CR-06-00219-BLW GERARDO ESPARZA-HERRERA, a.k.a. Omar Brabo Beltran, OPINION Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gerardo Segura-Balderas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Segura-Balderas has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gerardo Segura-Balderas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Segura-Balderas has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly