Cases

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 205–221 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 30, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

OPINION AND ORDER Shira A. Scheindlin, U.S.DJ. I. INTRODUCTION Brian Wynn, John Williams, Awilda Guzman, Jose Otero, and Kevin Fulton (the “Named Plaintiffs”) bring this action alleging that their employer, the New York City Housing Authority (“NYCHA”), has been systematically under-compensating them due to their race and/or ethnicity. Plaintiffs assert causes of action for violations of

MEMORANDUM & ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior United States District Judge: Table of Contents I.Introduction.. .398 A. Essential Issue.. .398 B. Arguments of Parties... 399 II. Factual Background and Procedural History.. .400 A. Parties.. .400 1. Plaintiff.. .400 2.

401 F.Supp.2d 415 (2005) CUMBERLAND TRUCK EQUIPMENT CO., et al., Plaintiffs, v. DETROIT DIESEL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Diamond International Trucks, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Detroit Diesel Corporation, et al., Defendants. Nos. Civ.A. 05-616, Civ.A. 05-625. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. November 14, 2005.

Paul G. Gardephe, United States District Judge Plaintiff Charter Communications, Inc. ("Charter") seeks leave to file a Third Amended Complaint ("TAC") against Local 3 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO (the "Union"), asserting a claim under Section 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act ("LMRA"), 29 U.S.

ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. Presently before the court is plaintiff Teller’s motion for summary judgment as to his copyright infringement claim. (Doc. *1231# 122). Pm se defendant Gerard Dogge filed a response in opposition (doc. # 151), and Teller filed a reply (doc. # 172). Also before the court is Telle

438 F.Supp.2d 229 (2006) Robert NIGRO, Pat Damiani, Jr., Joseph Deleonardis, John Dispensa, Robert Dizine, et. al., as Trustees of the IBEW Local 363 Pension, Welfare, Annuity and J.A.T. Funds, Plaintiffs, v. William A. DWYER d/b/a On-Line Electric, Defendant. No. 05 Civ. 2712(CM)(GAY). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 14, 2006.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior United District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction... 357 II. Factual Background... 358 A. Collective Bargaining Agreement (Apr. 1, 2009—Mar. 31,2013)... 358 B. Memorandum of Agreement ...3

220 F.Supp.2d 254 (2002) YONKERS ELECTRIC CONTRACTING CORP., Plaintiff, v. LOCAL UNION NO. 3, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD ELECTRICAL WORKERS' AFL-CIO and Dennis McSpedon, individually and as President of Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood Electrical Workers' AFL-CIO Defendants. No. 02 Civ. 3193(CM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 10, 2002.

660 F.3d 1014 (2011) Gerard J. KEATING, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated; Janet A. Keating, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Frank R. Krejci, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated; Jane Krejci, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated; Timothy Peterson, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated; Linda Peterson,

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge. This action arises from Plaintiffs’ investment in residential mortgage-backed securities that were issued or underwritten by RBS Holdings USA Inc., RBS Securities Inc., RBS Acceptance, Inc., and RBS Financial Products Inc. (collectively, the “Defendants” or “RBS”). Defendants have *494</

21-2174-cv Peretti v. Authentic Brands Group, LLC UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2021 Argued: April 8, 2022 Decided: May 4, 2022 Docket No. 21-2174-cv VALENTINA M. PERETTI ACUTI, PAUL J. REITNAUER, III, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

ORDER RICHARD W. STORY, District Judge. This case is before the Court for consideration of the Final Report and Recommendation [46] of Magistrate Judge Janet F. King. After reviewing the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”), the Parties’ Objections [52 & 53] and the Parties’ Responses to Objections [54 & 55], the Court enters the following order.

Opinion LANDAU, J. The plaintiffs, Richard Opotzner and Florence Opotzner,1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered following the denial of their motion to set aside the verdict. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly (1) instructed the jury, (2) excluded evidence and (3) failed to grant their motion to set aside the verdict. We affir

777 A.2d 459 (2001) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. David CHMIEL, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued November 1, 2000. Filed February 5, 2001. Reargument Denied April 20, 2001. *462 Paul P. Ackourey and Gerard E. Grealish, Scranton, for appellant. Ronald T. Williamson, Asst. Dist.

Plaintiffs filed a complaint in the Sangamon County circuit court, alleging that section 201(m) of the Illinois Income Tax Act (Tax Code) (35 ILCS 5/201(m) (West Supp. 1999)) is unconstitutional, in that it violates section 3 of article I (Ill. Const. 1970, art. I, § 3), section 3 of article X (Ill. Const. 1970, art. X, § 3), section 1(a) of article VIII (Ill. Const. 1970, art. VIII, § 1(a)), and section 2 of article IX (Ill. Const. 1970, art. IX, §

John E. Jennings, Judge. This case presents a question in the law of insurance. The facts are not in dispute. On June 6, 1994, James Austin rented a 1994 Ford Probe from Trotter Ford in Pine Bluff. The rental agreement he signed provided that he would use the vehicle in conformity with all laws and would refrain from using it while under the influence of intoxicants. Later that day Mr. Austin

542 F.Supp. 887 (1982) Muriel DIAMOND, Plaintiff, v. WORLD NEWS CORPORATION, E. G. Viles, K. R. Murdoch, R. R. Dittrich, Richard Sarazen, Marty Singerman, Gerard Fragetti, Edward R. Zemlock, John Doe, Richard Roe, John Doe Corporation and Richard Roe Corporation, Defendants. No. 81 Civ. 1657(MEL). United States District Court, S. D. New York. July 7, 1982. I. Ben Gr

ORDER SAM SPARKS, District Judge. BE IT REMEMBERED on the 19th of September, 2013, the Court called a hearing in the above-styled cause, and the parties appeared by and through counsel. Pending before the Court are the following summary judgment motions: Duke Energy Corporation, Duke Ventures, LLC, and Spectra Energy Capital, LLC (collectively, Duke)’s Motion for Summary Judgment [# 157], Plain

OPINION NETTESHEIM, Judge. After trial the court found and concluded that plaintiff Marty Keller, his wife Florence E. Keller, and the Kellers’ other partners (“plaintiffs”) in a land ownership venture called Last Dollar Associates had failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence the existence of a contract whereby defendant, through the Forest Service of the United States Department of Agricult