⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Geraldine F Street”

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016-09-20 · Published · cited 95× · 837 F.3d 343; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 17138; 2016 WL 5030330
OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge: Kenyado Newsuan was standing in the street, naked, high on PCP, and yelling and flailing his arms. Philadelphia police officer Thomas Dempsey arrived on the scene and, without waiting for backup, ordered Newsuan to approach. What happened next is a matter of some dispute, but what happened at the end of the encounter is not: Newsuan attacked Dempsey, slammed hi
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016-08-22 · Published · cited 156× · 834 F.3d 606; 2016 FED App. 0203P; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15330
OPINION GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge Following a remand for a new trial, Burley v. Gagacki, 729 F.3d 610 (6th Cir. 2013), the jury found that defendants did not participate in the police raid that resulted in plaintiffs’ claims of excessive force. Plaintiffs appeal several of the district court’s pre-trial rulings regarding the new trial. Fin
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013-09-06 · Published · cited 130× · 729 F.3d 610; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 18577; 2013 WL 4767178
OPINION GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge. On June 13, 2007, masked law enforcement agents, dressed in black, with guns drawn, broke into a home at 20400 Greeley Street in the City of Detroit. Within the confines of plaintiffs’ home, the masked agents allegedly assaulted and terrorized plaintiffs Geraldine and Caroline Burley. When Geraldine Burley asked the intruders
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018-08-27 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1900 GERALDINE L. VANDEVENDER, Administrator of the Estate of Del Ray Baird, deceased, and Jacqueline Ann Baird, deceased; NORWOOD R. JONES, Co-Executor of the Estate of Elizabeth J. Jones, deceased; LISA J. PATE, Co- Executor of the Estate of Elizabeth J. Jones, deceased; JOYCE
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2015-02-03 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KIM E. AYVAZIAN CHANCERY COURTHOUSE MASTER IN CHANCERY 34 The Circle GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2004-01-20 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 20, 2003 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 20, 2004. In The
In re Earl F.public domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012-11-27 · Published · cited 0× · 208 Md. App. 269; 56 A.3d 553; 2012 Md. App. LEXIS 134
J. FREDERICK SHARER (Retired, Specially Assigned) J. Appellant, Earl F., appeals from a restitution order of the Circuit Court for Cecil County, sitting as a juvenile court, entered after he was adjudicated a delinquent child, having been found to be involved in a robbery, theft, and assault. The restitution order was entered against Earl F. and his mother, and reduced to judgment. On August 31, 2010, the
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-06-11 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-15-00396-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/11/2015 2:40:08 PM
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996-01-19 · Published · cited 0×
FILED BENNY SMITH, ET UX, GERALDINE ) Jan. 19, 1996 SMITH, ) ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk Petitioners/Appellees, ) ) Overton Chancery
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-03-17 · Published · cited 3× · 171 F. Supp. 3d 156; 94 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 269; 2016 WL 1071105; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34594
OPINION AND ORDER1 SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. I. INTRODUCTION In 2007, Alan Newton sued the City of New York (the “City”) and certain of its employees (with the City, “defendants”), alleging a federal civil rights claim and pendent state claims for defendants’ failure to produce a rape kit that, when finally located in 2005, overturned his 1
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018-09-04 · Published · cited 18× · 903 F.3d 65
HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. These consolidated petitions for review concern the Atlantic Sunrise Project, an expansion of the natural-gas distribution network owned by Intervenor Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company (Transco). At issue is a decision of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP or the Department) granting Atlantic Sunrise a Water Quality Certificati
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2012-08-14 · Published · cited 524× · 211 N.J. 420; 48 A.3d 1075
Justice ALBIN delivered the opinion of the Court. Defendant F.M. (Fernanda) appeals the termination of her parental rights to her now five-year-old daughter, Quinn, and four-year-old son, Troy, Jr.1 Both children were born of a relationship between Fernanda and T.J. (Troy). The family court found that Troy had committed an act of domestic violence against Fernanda, had an intractabl
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007-02-07 · Published · cited 253× · 476 F.3d 397; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 2594; 2007 WL 397000
OPINION GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge. Defendants Daniel Lubelan and Jerry Ellsworth appeal the denial of their motion for summary judgment brought pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 56(c). Defendants argue that the district court mistakenly concluded that genuine issues of material fact precluded the entry of summary judgment and that it failed to consider whether defen
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981-07-17 · Published · cited 82× · 653 F.2d 1185; 48 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5897; 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11332
MAROVITZ, Senior District Judge. Petitioners Robert F. McPartlin and his wife Geraldine McPartlin appeal an order of the United States Tax Court dismissing their petition for a redetermination of a tax deficiency. The tax deficiency was determined by respondent Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (the “Commissioner”) with
Mayhew v. Burwellpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014-11-17 · Published · cited 12× · 772 F.3d 80; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 21723; 2014 WL 6224938
LYNCH, Chief Judge. After providing Medicaid coverage for over 20 years for 19- and 20-year old children whose families met low-income requirements, in 2012, Maine DHHS 1 sought *82 to drop that coverage by proposing an amendment to its Medi
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984-03-12 · Published · cited 139× · 727 F.2d 1225; 234 U.S. App. D.C. 126
SCALIA, Circuit Judge, dissenting: When disagreement with the majority of the court ultimately pertains to the probative value of the evidence unique to the particular case, a lengthy dissent is seldom worth writing or reading. I think otherwise here for two reasons. First, because the majority’s analysis of the evidence involves a basic error of law — that evid
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2018-08-31 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 08-18-00134-CV EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS EL PASO, TEXAS 8/3
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986-06-24 · Published · cited 0× · 677 F. Supp. 323; 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23773; 41 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1331; 1986 WL 15941
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION UNDER RULE 52 LUDWIG, District Judge. This is a civil rights action arising from the termination of plaintiff’s employment by defendant. Plaintiff claims unlawful retaliation. Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a).1 Jurisdiction attaches under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343 and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(3). The following facts are uncontested:
Smith v. Rushpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-10-29 · Published · cited 0× · 350 F. App'x 162
MEMORANDUM ** Geraldine Kay Smith appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s *163(“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders dismissing her adversary proceeding for lack of prosecution and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the BAP’s decision, Simpson v.
Smith v. Rushpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-10-29 · Published · cited 0× · 350 F. App'x 162
MEMORANDUM ** Geraldine Kay Smith appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s *163(“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders dismissing her adversary proceeding for lack of prosecution and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the BAP’s decision, Simpson v.