Cases

¶1 Van Deren, A.C.J. — Eric Albert Watson challenges his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender, arguing that the registration statute, RCW 9A.44.130-(4)(a)(i), is unconstitutionally vague because it fails to advise registrants that they must register after release from confinement for probation violations regardless of whether their registration information changed since their initial registration

Quinn-Brintnall, A.C.J. — Charles Watson appeals his standard range sentence for delivery of a controlled sub*525stance on the grounds that the trial court failed to grant an evidentiary hearing on disputed facts, failed to follow statutory sentencing procedures, and violated his equal protection and due process rights when it denied his request that he be sentenced under

OPINION OF THE COURT McKee, Chief Judge Joseph Watson, an inmate at the State Correctional Institution at Somerset, Pennsylvania, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging prison officials violated his First Amendment rights by improperly issuing a misconduct against him, and by retaliating against him for the exercise of his First Amendment rights. The District Court dismissed Wat

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ANNQUASIA WATSON, § § No. 237, 2024 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below–Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID No. 2206005032 (N) STATE OF DELAWARE, §

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT FEBRUARY 18, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT S

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT DECEMBER 8, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SU

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT DECEMBER 8, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SU

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-3508 GERALD FITSCHEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal f

Filed 6/27/19 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2019 ND 164 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. James Glenn Watson, Defendant and Appellant No. 20180294 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. James Glenn Watson,

Peterson, Judge. Rodrekus Watson, convicted of robbery as a lesser included offense of armed robbery and theft by receiving stolen property, appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict made after the State’s case-in-chief, and urges us to overrule precedent from the Supreme Court of Georgia

Opinion HUFFMAN, J. —Khary Watson challenges his sentence of life without the possibility of parole (LWOP) for committing felony murder when he was only four months shy of his 18th birthday. Watson’s offense occurred after he chased down a woman who tried to run away while Watson was robbing her. Watson sh

Hunt, J. ¶1 Joseph George Coleman appeals his conviction for first degree burglary and his exceptional sentence based on three aggravating sentencing factors: sexual motivation, invasion of privacy, and presence of the victim during the commission of the crime. He argues that we should vacate his exceptional sentence because (1) the trial court improperly required the jury to continue deliberating after it returned a nonunanimous

KELLY, Circuit Judge. Following trial, a jury convicted Gerald Wayne LeBeau (Gerald) of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C); and convicted Gerald and his son Neil Thomas LeBeau (Neil) of conspiracy to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B), and 846, and conspiracy to distribute ma

¶1 — Eddie Crumble appeals his convictions of two counts of first degree attempted murder while armed with a firearm, two counts of first degree assault committed with a firearm, one count of first degree burglary while armed with a firearm, and one count of first degree unlawful possession of a firearm. Crumble argues that (1) the assault convictions violate double jeopardy because they are based on the same criminal conduct as the attempted murder coun

Bridgewater, J. ¶1 Guy Daniel Turner requests that this court vacate his second degree assault conviction, which the trial court did not reduce to judgment, based on double jeopardy considerations. Our Supreme Court asked us to reconsider this issue in light of its recent decision in *281State v. Womac, 160 Wn.2d 643, 160 P.3d 40 (2007). After reviewing Womac

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D23-605 Lower Tribunal No. 20-CP-2416-XX _____________________________ JAMES E. FOSTER, JR., Appellant, v. VICKIE L. WATSON, as Personal Representa

¶1 — Ralph Perez appeals his convictions for first degree burglary, third degree malicious mischief, and fourth degree assault after he confronted a neighbor in his apartment complex. He argues that (1) the trial court violated his right to a fair trial by allowing a possibly intoxicated person, Shaun Ingram, to testify; (2) the trial court violated his right to confront and fully examine a witness (a) by not allowing Perez to question Ingram regarding hi

*509¶1 Richard Lee Carlson appeals his bench trial convictions and sentence for first degree escape and unlawful possession of cocaine. He argues that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his escape conviction because the State failed to prove that his escape was “knowing,” (2) the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are inadequate under CrR 6.1, and (3) the trial court er

12/11/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 2, 2017 KIM COVARRUBIAS v. GERALD EDWARD BAKER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 107966 Gregory S. McMillan, Judge No. E2016-02316-COA-R3-CV This ap

Houghton, J. ¶1 David Erickson appeals his conviction of two counts of first degree child rape. He argues that the trial court denied him his constitutional right to public trial by allowing private questioning of prospective jurors. We reverse and remand for a new trial.1 *203FACTS ¶2 The State charged Er