Cases

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 757 OPINION This is an interlocutory appeal from the trial court's order denying the special appearance of Smart Call, L.L.C. Smart Call contends the trial court erred because it does not have the minimum contacts to support personal jurisdiction. We affirm. I</

Tufte, Justice. [¶ 1] John Smart appeal^ from an amended divorce judgment and from an order and judgment denying his motion for relief under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60. We conclude that the district court’s equitable redistribution of the marital property was not clearly erroneous and that the court did not abuse its discretion in entering the amended judgment, denying Smart’s subsequent p

573 F.3d 523 (2009) Ronald D. SMART, doing business as Paschall Electric, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCAL 702 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, Christopher N. Grant and Schuchat, Cook & Werner, Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-4088. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. July 22, 2009. *524 Ronald D. Smart,

562 F.3d 798 (2009) Ronald D. SMART, doing business as Paschall Electric, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCAL 702 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, Christopher N. Grant and Schuchat, Cook & Werner, Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-4088. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Submitted April 30, 2008. Decided April 7, 2009.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1561 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Gerald E. Cardwell, Jr. llll

ELIZABETH ERNY FOOTE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is an appeal filed by the Appellant, Harold L. Rosbottom, Jr. ("Rosbottom"), of an order issued by the Bankruptcy Court dated June 8, 2016, denying a motion entitled "Rule 60(b) Motion to Vacate the Chapter 11 Confirmation Plan." [Record Doc. 1]. The Appellees are the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Trustee, Gerald Schiff ("Schiff" or "Trustee"), Louisiana Truck Stop

ORDER URSULA UNGARO, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Cross-Motions for Partial Summary Judgment. D.E. 60 and 62. THE COURT has considered the motions and the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The motions have been fully briefed and are ripe for determination. BACKGROUND

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs October 7, 2014 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GERALD MCEWEN Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 07-00466 Paula Skahan, Judge No. W2013-02692-CCA-R3-CD - Filed April 29, 2015 A Shelby County Criminal Court Jury convicted the appellant, Gerald McEwen, of first degree pr

561 P.2d 1052 (1977) UTAH HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Herbert L. SMART, Director of Finance of the State of Utah, and David Smith Monson, Auditor of the State of Utah, Defendants and Appellants. No. 14924. Supreme Court of Utah. March 14, 1977. Vernon B. Romney, Atty. Gen., William T. Evans, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for defendants a

LUMBARD, Circuit Judge: Carlos Smart appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered on July 24, 1969, after a jury trial in the Southern District of New York, Harold R. Tyler, J., on one count of conspiracy to violate 26 U.S.C. §§ 4705(a) and 7237(b) (selling cocaine without a written order form),

970 So.2d 49 (2007) SMART DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC v. Michael B. MILLER. No. 07-670. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. October 31, 2007. Rehearing Denied December 26, 2007. *50 Michael B. Miller, Miller & Miller, Crowley, LA, for Defendant/Appellant, Michael B. Miller. Brian F. Blackwell, Bla

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON December 5, 2000 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GERALD L. POWERS Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 96-08230 & -08231 Joseph Dailey, Judge No. W1999-02348-CCA-R3-DD - Filed September 28, 2001 The Defendant, Gerald L. Powers, was convicted by a jury of fi

WIGGINS, Justice. Patients who requested medical records and billing statements from their healthcare providers filed a class action lawsuit claiming the company that fulfilled their records requests charged excessive fees in .violation of Iowa Code section 622.10(6) (2013). The company moved to dismiss the petition, alleging section 622.10(6) did not apply.to it because it was

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge This long-running case features a civil-enforcement action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission, alleging that e-Smart Technologies, Inc., a public company, was a sham. While it purported to be at the cutting edge of developing and manufacturing a biometric “smar

[Cite as Mahle Behr Dayton, L.L.C. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp., 2021-Ohio-145.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY : MAHLE BEHR DAYTON, LLC, et al. : : Appellate Case No. 28772 Plaintiff-Appellant

KAPSNER, Justice. [¶ 1] Dan and Leanne Abelmann appeal from a judgment dismissing their eviction action against SmartLease USA, L.L.C. The Abelmanns argue the district court erred as a matter of law in construing their written lease with SmartLease and in determining any breaches of the lease by SmartLease were immaterial and of nonessential terms. We reverse and remand, conclud

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 07-4088 R ONALD D. SMART, doing business as P ASCHALL E LECTRIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L OCAL 702 INTERNATIONAL B ROTHERHOOD O F E LECTRICAL W ORKERS, C HRISTOPHER N. G RANT AND S CHUCHAT, C OOK & W ERNER, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 1, 2011 Session GERALD LEE POWERS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. P27411 Carolyn Wade Blackett, Judge No. W2009-01068-CCA-R3-PD - Filed February 22, 2012 The petitioner, Gerald Lee Powers, appeals the judgment of the Shelby County Criminal Court

Plaintiff-appellant, Gerald Siglow, was injured when he went to help his neighbor, Edward G. Smart, defendant-appellee in this case, apprehend a burglar in Smart's home. The injury occurred when the butt of a shotgun wielded by Smart in an attempt to subdue the would-be burglar struck Siglow's hand. Siglow brought suit against Smart for medical expenses and lost wages. A jury, in a general verdict untested by interrogatories, found for the defendant. This court affirms. Siglow's three

OPINION Justice SAYLOR. This case involves whether the Superior Court properly interpreted and applied Section 385 of the Second Restatement of Torts, which relates to the liability of a contractor or employee who creates a dan*595gerous condition on land on behalf of the land’s possessor. According to the plaintiffs’