Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gerald E Conklin and Angel L Conklin”
Schimpf v. Gerald, Inc.public domain
52 F.Supp.2d 976 (1999) Nick SCHIMPF, Helen Schimpf, Frank Schimpf, Bonnie Schimpf, and S & R Egg Farm, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. GERALD, INC. and Charles F. Marino, Administrator of The Estate of Edward F. Keiser, Defendants. No. 97-C-545. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. May 14, 1999. *977
Purnie Peterson v. CitiMortgage, Inc.public domain
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Approximately thirty-five mortgagors appeal from the district court’s 1 dismissal of their claims against the Federal Home *550 Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) and other financial institutions, the law firm of Usset
Calovecchi v. Michiganpublic domain
611 N.W.2d 300 (2000) 461 Mich. 616 Ronald F. CALOVECCHI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. State of MICHIGAN, Michigan State Police, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 110091, Calendar No. 5. Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued December 8, 1999. Decided April 18, 2000. Sinas, Dramis, Brake, Boughton § McIntyre, P.C. (by Deborah A. Deprez) L
364 B.R. 81 (2006) COMMITTEE OF TORT LITIGANTS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SPOKANE, et al., Defendants. No. 05-CV-274-JLQ, Bkty. Ct. No. 04-08822-PCW11. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. June 30, 2006. *82 James I. Stang, Pachulski Stang Ziehl Young Jones & Weintraub PC, Los Angeles, CA, John W. C
OPINION ORME, Judge: 1 In February 2005, Plaintiffs, a group of present and former owners of dairy farms in Millard County, filed suit against Defendants, who own, operate, or manage the In-termountain Power Plant (IPP) in Millard County or its associated high voltage direct current transmission line. Plaintiffs alleged that stray direct current electric
Dees v. Distenfieldpublic domain
618 F.Supp. 123 (1985) Rigdon O. DEES, III, Plaintiff, v. Ira T. DISTENFIELD and Smith Barney Harris Upham & Co. Inc., Defendants. No. CV 84-8676 PAR. United States District Court, C.D. California. July 17, 1985. Gerald F. Edelstein, Peter Laird, Arrow, Edelstein, Gross & Asher, C.C., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff. Peter Brown Dolan, P.C., Maren E.
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. Dial-A-Mattress International, Ltd. and Sweet Dreams Unlimited, Inc. were joint venturers engaged in the business of telemarketing bedding products and accessories. The parties memorialized their relationship in an agreement signed March 8, 1991 (the Agreement). The Agreement provided that Sweet Dreams, in exchange for the right to use certain of Dial-A-Mattress’ trademarks, trade names and telephone num
FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
Ward v. County of Orangepublic domain
55 F.Supp.2d 1325 (1999) William G. WARD, d/b/a Bourbon Street South, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE, Defendant. No. 98-428-CIV-ORL-19B. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. April 29, 1999. *1326 Steven Gerald Mason, Law Office of Steven G. Mason, Orlando, FL, for plaintiff. Joel D. Prinsell, Orang
1 F.3d 639 SWEET DREAMS UNLIMITED, INC., an Illinois Corporation,Plaintiff-Appellee,v.DIAL-A-MATTRESS INTERNATIONAL, LTD., a Delaware Corporation,Dial-A-Mattress Operating Corporation, a New YorkCorporation, Napoleon Barragan, LuisBarragan and Joseph Vicens,Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-3506. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Arg
Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.public domain
322 N.W.2d 599 (1982) James THAYER, et al., Appellants, v. AMERICAN FINANCIAL ADVISERS, INC., et al., Defendants, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., et al., Respondents. No. 81-557. Supreme Court of Minnesota. August 6, 1982. *600 Gerald M. Fine, Wayzata, for appellants. Dorsey, Windhorst, Hannaford,
ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
Roberts v. Heimpublic domain
670 F.Supp. 1466 (1987) Phillip D. ROBERTS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Werner HEIM, et al., Defendants. No. C 84-8069 TEH. United States District Court, N.D. California. March 23, 1987. *1467 *1468 *1469 *1470
Cape Publications, Inc. v. Hitchnerpublic domain
549 So.2d 1374 (1989) CAPE PUBLICATIONS, INC., Vince Spezzano, and Jere Maupin, Petitioners, v. Phillip HITCHNER and Barbara Hitchner, His Wife, Respondents. No. 71554. Supreme Court of Florida. October 5, 1989. Rehearing Denied November 9, 1989. Jack A. Kirschenbaum of Wolfe, Kirschenbaum & Peeples, P.A., Cocoa Beach, Florence Snyder Rivas of E
Nebraska Drillers, Inc. v. Westchester Fire Ins.public domain
123 F.Supp. 678 (1954) NEBRASKA DRILLERS, Inc. v. WESTCHESTER FIRE INS. CO. OF NEW YORK. Civ. A. No. 3867. United States District Court D. Colorado. August 25, 1954. *679 O'Neill & O'Neill, Denver, Colo., F. P. O'Neill, and Gerald H. Galligan, Denver, Colo., for plaintiff. Clarence R. Conklin, of Heineke & Conklin,
Garcia v. Statepublic domain
URBIGKIT, Justice, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in affirming the conviction of Glenn Eddie Garcia (Garcia), age eighteen, for aggravated assault as well as interference with a police officer. These charges resulted from his conduct with a motor vehicle which endangered the police officer, the general public, his automobile passengers and, of course, hims
Roberts v. Heimpublic domain
ORDER THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge. The foregoing recommendations of the Special Master are adopted in their entirety and respondents are ordered to comply with their terms. The Court will issue a separate order with respect to sanctions pursuant to section VIII of the recommendations. RECOMMENDATION OF SPECIAL MASTER AND ORDER THEREON GERALD A. COHN, Specia
Dolores Canning Co. v. Howardpublic domain
40 Cal.App.3d 673 (1974) 115 Cal. Rptr. 435 DOLORES CANNING CO., INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. ROBERT E. HOWARD, as Labor Commissioner, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. 41729. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. July 17, 1974. *676 COUNSEL <
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS