⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “George W. Buchanan”

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986-12-02 · Published · cited 21× · 806 F.2d 305; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34139
PER CURIAM. Plaintiff George W. Nicholas appeals from a judgment of the district court dismissing his complaint against defendant William Buchanan for lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm. In 1985, Nicholas, a citizen of Rhode Island, filed a complaint in federal district court for the district of Rhode I
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004-10-07 · Published · cited 66× · 386 F.3d 1116; 72 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1785; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20922; 2004 WL 2248109
LINN, Circuit Judge. Arnold C. Bilstad, Bradley H. Buchanan, Alan W. Martilla, and Archie Woodworth (collectively “Bilstad”) appeal from: (1) a March 31, 2003 decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) and (2) a May 23, 2003 decision of the Board on reconsideration awarding judgment in Interference No. 104,832 t
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024-09-30 · Published · cited 0×
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 30, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-275 Lower Tribunal No. 22-13022 ________________ George Buchanan, Appellant,
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023-09-13 · Published · cited 0×
6 September 13, 2023 No. 452 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON In the Matter of the Marriage of Bobbi Lynn BUCHANAN, Petitioner-Appellant, and Robert Paul BUCHANAN, Respondent-Respondent. Clackamas County Circuit Court 16DR10064; A177872 Ulanda L. Watkins, Judge.
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023-09-13 · Published · cited 4× · 328 Or. App. 6; 536 P.3d 1064
6 Argued and submitted April 19, supplemental judgment for attorney fees and costs vacated and remanded, otherwise affirmed September 13, 2023 In the Matter of the Marriage of Bobbi Lynn BUCHANAN, Petitioner-Appellant, and Robert Paul BUCHANAN, Respondent-Respondent. Clackamas County Circuit C
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010-08-18 · Published · cited 82× · 619 F.3d 632; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17184; 2010 WL 3256029
HELENE N. WHITE, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I join the majority opinion except Part 11(C)(2) and the related portion of Part III, from which I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the summary dismissal of claims based on Wyeth’s alleged negligence in failing to adequately investigate adverse reports regarding Redux after FDA approval, and in faili
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020-05-20 · Published · cited 0×
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, As Trustee for Lehman Mortgage Trust Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-8, Appellant, v. GEORGE E. BUCHANAN a/k/a G. EUGENE BUCHANAN and JO ANNE BUCHANAN, Appellees. No
Haas v. Georgepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2002-03-22 · Published · cited 52× · 71 S.W.3d 904; 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 2092; 2002 WL 440561
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 906 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 907 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT
Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998-12-10 · Published · cited 10× · 586 N.W.2d 573; 231 Mich. App. 536
586 N.W.2d 573 (1998) 231 Mich. App. 536 Darryl BUCHANAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY COUNCIL OF FLINT, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 193153. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted May 5, 1998, at Grand Rapids. Decided September 11, 1998, at 9:10 a.m. Released for Publication December 10, 1998.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000-02-17 · Published · cited 0× · 213 F.3d 302; 2000 WL 730235
GILMAN, J., announced the judgment of the court and, with one exception, delivered the opinion of the court. MOORE, J., concurred in the opinion except as to Part II.C.3 (the drug dog issue). JONES, J. (pp. 315-18), delivered a separate opinion in which he concurred in the above opinion except as to Parts II.C.3 and II.C.5 (the photo issue). MOORE, J., joined in this opinion only as to Part I, making it the opinion of the court as to the drug dog issue.</
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005-08-01 · Published · cited 1× · 417 F.3d 424; 2005 WL 1798341
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WIDENER wrote the opinion, in which Senior Judge WILLIAMS concurred. Judge MICHAEL wrote a separate opinion concurring in part III and concurring in the judgment. *427OPINION WIDENER, Circuit Judge: Petitioners Media General Operations and the New York Times Company appeal the district court’s S
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995-10-18 · Published · cited 12× · 908 P.2d 242; 121 N.M. 12
908 P.2d 242 (1995) 121 N.M. 12 Muriel BUCHANAN, Claimant-Appellant, v. KERR-McGEE CORPORATION, d/b/a Quivira Mining Company, Respondent-Appellee. No. 16097. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. October 18, 1995. *243 Earl Mettler, Mettler & LeCuyer, P.C., Albuquerque, New Mexico, for Claimant-Appellant.
Bassien v. Buchananpublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 1990-10-04 · Published · cited 2× · 798 P.2d 667; 310 Or. 402; 1990 Ore. LEXIS 336
798 P.2d 667 (1990) 310 Or. 402 Richard V. BASSIEN, Respondent, v. Martin BUCHANAN, George Choban, Thomas P. Dennehy and Don McIntire, Respondents-Appellants, Barbara Roberts, Secretary of State, Appellant-Respondent, and Gregory Kafoury, Elaine Kelley, Lloyd K. Marbet, William B. Early and Gene Pinniger, Intervenors-Appellants. William June, Respondent, v. BARBARA ROBERTS, Secretary of State, and Dick
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023-06-23 · Published · cited 29× · 71 F.4th 1003
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 4, 2023 Decided June 23, 2023 No. 22-5133 RADIYA BUCHANAN, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. WILLIAM P. BARR, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AS FORMER U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL., APPELLEES Consolidated with 22-5139 Appeals from the United Stat
District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2018-01-10 · Published · cited 0× · 284 F. Supp. 3d 792
JUDGE SHELLY D. DICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT This matter is before the Court on the cross Motions for Summary Judgment1 by Defendants, F. King Alexander, Damon Andrew, A.G. Monaco, and Gaston Reinoso ("Defendants") and Plaintiff, Teresa Buchanan ("Plaintiff"). The parties have filed Oppositions2 and Replies3 to the
State v. Buchananpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017-04-13 · Published · cited 10× · 2017 Ohio 1361
[Cite as State v. Buchanan, 2017-Ohio-1361.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 104500 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2019-02-21 · Published · cited 0×
02/21/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 15, 2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TAVARES DEWAYNE BUCHANAN, AKA TAVAREA DEWAYNE BUCHANAN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2016-A-196 Mark J. Fishburn, Judge
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015-02-04 · Published · cited 2× · 158 So. 3d 253; 14 La.App. 3 Cir. 1000; 2015 La. App. LEXIS 190; 2015 WL 445740
GREMILLION, Judge. |t In this workers’ compensation case, the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) awarded weekly indemnity benefits, $8,000.00 in penalties, and attorney fees of $12,625.00 to' Michelle Buchanan. Her employer, Vitello, Inc. (Vitello), and its workers’ compensation insurer, LUBA Workers’ Compensation, appeal. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. FACTS On October 22, 2012,
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2022-06-01 · Published · cited 14× · 874 S.E.2d 52; 313 Ga. 811
313 Ga. 811 FINAL COPY S21G1147. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC v. BUCHANAN et al. BETHEL, Justice. In a civil lawsuit in Georgia, the discovery process allows litigants to gather information about a case from other litigants and third parties in an orderly and defined manner. Georgia, like most states, also provides various mechanisms for litigants and third parties to seek relief from the demands of discovery. One such method is by moving for a protective order under OCGA § 9-11-26
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988-02-03 · Published · cited 5× · 531 So. 2d 1; 1988 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 41; 1988 WL 7081
In August 1985, George Edwards filed suit in the Jefferson County Circuit Court for benefits under the workmen's compensation laws of Alabama. Edwards alleged that, in September of 1984, he was injured in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with Buchanan Lumber Company. A hearing was held on September 2, 1986, and the court found in favor of the employee, Edwards. That order stated in part as follows: "The Court specifically finds