Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “George Tyler Swain”
Swain v. Wiley Collegepublic domain
74 S.W.3d 143 (2002) Dr. Ronald L. SWAIN, Appellant, v. WILEY COLLEGE, Appellee. No. 06-01-00083-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted January 31, 2002. Decided April 12, 2002. *144 Beverly C. Dureus, Kevin B. Wiggins, H. Ron White, Tonya Parker, White & Wiggins, LLP, Dallas, for appellant.
George Neloms v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Dec 13 2017, 6:32 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
Swain v. Spinneypublic domain
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Kelli Swain was subjected to a strip search and visual body cavity inspection, while being held in a cell in the North Reading, Massachusetts police station. This search occurred after Swain had been in the cell for twenty minutes, and more than an hour after she was arrested. She was arrested with her boyfriend as a result of his shoplifting; she was suspect
Swain v. Roepublic domain
USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 96-2035 KELLI SWAIN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v.
Timothy Bostic v. George Schaeferpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1167 TIMOTHY B. BOSTIC; TONY C. LONDON; CAROL SCHALL; MARY TOWNLEY, Plaintiffs − Appellees, JOANNE HARRIS; JESSICA DUFF; CHRISTY BERGHOFF; VICTORIA KIDD, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Intervenors, v. GEORGE E. SCHAEFER, III
Dr. Ronald L. Swain v. Wiley Collegepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-01-00083-CV
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Boumediene, Lakhdar v. Bush, Georgepublic domain
476 F.3d 981 Lakhdar BOUMEDIENE, Detainee, Camp Delta, et al., Appellantsv.George W. BUSH, President of the United States, et al., AppelleesKhaled A.F. Al Odah, Next Friend of Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad Al Odah et al., Appellees/Cross-Appellantsv.United States of America, et al., Appellants/Cross-Appellees. No. 05-5062. No. 05-5063. No. 05-5064.
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Franke v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
398 F.Supp.2d 833 (2005) Robert FRANKE, Plaintiff, and Kentucky Associated General Contractors Self-Insurance Fund, Intervening Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Gemini Products, Inc., d/b/a Knight Ergonomics & Assembly Systems, and Air Technical Industries, Inc. Defendants and Ford Motor Company, Third-Party Plaintiff, and Abel Construction Company, Inc., Intervening Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Burns Machinery Moving &
West 52nd Theatre Co., Inc. v. Tylerpublic domain
CLARK, Circuit Judge. The debtor in this proceeding in reorganization owns the Guild Theatre in New York City, originally occupied by the Theatre Guild, but now leased to a broadcasting system for use of the theatre proper *129 and to another tenant for use of the offices. It was erected in 1924 at
Harris v. TD Ameritrade Inc.public domain
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Jan Harris brings this action for trespass and an accounting against Defendants TD Ameritrade Inc., TD Ameritrade Clearing, Inc., Scottrade Inc. (collectively, the "Brokerage Defendants") and Defendants Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, Depository Trust Company, and Cede & Co. (collectively, the "DTC Defendants"). The Court has jurisdiction of this action pursua
Marcus Tarvi Jarrett v. Statepublic domain
NO. 12-11-00177-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS MARCUS TARVI JARRETT, § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE §
Cite as 2025 Ark. 59 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered: May 1, 2025 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2025 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2025 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2025. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, the clerk of t
Offutt v. Sheehanpublic domain
344 N.E.2d 92 (1976) Hattie OFFUTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E. Gregg SHEEHAN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1-175A3. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. March 17, 1976. *94 James M. Redwine, Trockman, Flynn, Swain & Tyler, Arthur Griffith, Evansville, for appellant. Robert H. Hahn, George A. Porch, Evansville, for a
Rex Smith v. Kelly Davis and Amber Davispublic domain
NO. 12-14-00007-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS REX SMITH AND NANCY SMITH, § APPEAL FROM THE 294TH APPELLANTS V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT KELLY DAVIS AND AMBER DAVIS, APPELLEES § VAN ZANDT COUNTY, TEXAS
Columbia Gas System, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
334 F.Supp. 1279 (1971) The COLUMBIA GAS SYSTEM, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 68 Civ. 352. United States District Court, S. D. New York. December 9, 1971. *1280 Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City, for plaintiff; George G. Tyler, Richard J. Hiegel, Roger D. Pearson, New York City, of counsel
The Columbia Gas System, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
473 F.2d 1244 73-1 USTC P 9176 The COLUMBIA GAS SYSTEM, INC., Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 39, Docket 72-1269. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued Oct. 16, 1972.Decided Jan. 9, 1973. George G. Tyler, New York City (Richard J. Hiegel, Ro
Vogt v. United Statespublic domain
Davis, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: In 1969 and 1970 plaintiff, a United States citizen, was a partner in a Danish accounting firm and had been a resident of Denmark for more than three years. As such, he was entitled by the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, §§ 911(a) (1), (c) (1) (B), to exclude $25,000 of earned income from the computation of his United States income tax. The sole issue
James Willie Tabb v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Jun 04 2019, 9:10 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Cou