Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “George T. Bishop and Christine v. Bishop”
Bishop v. Smithpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 18, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of
Bishop v. Smithpublic domain
KELLY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Plaintiffs made an unusual decision in this case.1 They challenged only the constitutional amendment concerning same-gender marriage. Okla. Const, art. II, § 35. They ignored the earlier-enacted statutory provisions which define and only recognize marriage as between persons of opposit
Inyo County, California v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community of the Bishop Colonypublic domain
538 U.S. 701 INYO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ET AL.v.PAIUTE-SHOSHONE INDIANS OF THE BISHOP COMMUNITY OF THE BISHOP COLONY ET AL. No. 02-281. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 31, 2003. Decided May 19, 2003. The Bishop Paiute Tribe in California chartered and wholly owns the Bishop Paiut
Schmidt v. Bishoppublic domain
779 F.Supp. 321 (1991) Christine SCHMIDT, Plaintiff, v. Joseph P. BISHOP, Rye Presbyterian Church, Presbytery of Hudson River, Presbyterian Church (USA), Defendants. No. 91 Civ. 4125 (CLB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 6, 1991. *322 *323 Jeffrey R. Anderson, Reinhart &
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si
Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commissionpublic domain
2024 WI 13 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP2007 COMPLETE TITLE: Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc., Barron County Developmental Services, Inc., Diversified Services, Inc., Black River Industries, Inc. and Headwaters, Inc., Petitione
in Re: Thomas Lytle and Ellen Lytlepublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-15-00216-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/9/2015 2
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/2/2015 10
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2022-1050 ____________ PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA, et al., Petitioners, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, et al., Respondents. ____________ No. SC2022-1127
ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 3762693 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/201
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL
Sherrill v. JP Stevens and Co., Inc.public domain
410 F.Supp. 770 (1975) A. C. SHERRILL, Plaintiff, and Robert H. Costner et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. J. P. STEVENS AND COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. C-C-73-12. United States District Court, W. D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. November 11, 1975. *771 *772
ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM
Adams v. Commissioner of Motor Vehiclespublic domain
PER CURIAM. The plaintiff, Nicholas Adams, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles (commissioner), dismissing his appeal from the decision of the commissioner to suspend his motor vehicle operator's license, pursuant to General Statutes § 14-227b,