⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “George T. Bishop and Christine v. Bishop”

Bishop v. Smithpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-07-18 · Published · cited 0×
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 18, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of
Bishop v. Smithpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-07-18 · Published · cited 114× · 760 F.3d 1070; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13733; 2014 WL 3537847
KELLY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Plaintiffs made an unusual decision in this case.1 They challenged only the constitutional amendment concerning same-gender marriage. Okla. Const, art. II, § 35. They ignored the earlier-enacted statutory provisions which define and only recognize marriage as between persons of opposit
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-05-19 · Published · cited 102× · 155 L. Ed. 2d 933; 123 S. Ct. 1887; 538 U.S. 701; 2003 U.S. LEXIS 3676; 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 287; 71 U.S.L.W. 4370; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4189; 2003 Daily Journal DAR 5282
538 U.S. 701 INYO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ET AL.v.PAIUTE-SHOSHONE INDIANS OF THE BISHOP COMMUNITY OF THE BISHOP COLONY ET AL. No. 02-281. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 31, 2003. Decided May 19, 2003. The Bishop Paiute Tribe in California chartered and wholly owns the Bishop Paiut
Schmidt v. Bishoppublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 1991-12-06 · Published · cited 98× · 779 F. Supp. 321; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17878; 1991 WL 256408
779 F.Supp. 321 (1991) Christine SCHMIDT, Plaintiff, v. Joseph P. BISHOP, Rye Presbyterian Church, Presbytery of Hudson River, Presbyterian Church (USA), Defendants. No. 91 Civ. 4125 (CLB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 6, 1991. *322 *323 Jeffrey R. Anderson, Reinhart &
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 566 S.W.3d 410
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2023-09-07 · Published · cited 0×
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2024-03-14 · Published · cited 10× · 2024 WI 13
2024 WI 13 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP2007 COMPLETE TITLE: Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc., Barron County Developmental Services, Inc., Diversified Services, Inc., Black River Industries, Inc. and Headwaters, Inc., Petitione
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-10-09 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-15-00216-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/9/2015 2
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2015-04-02 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/2/2015 10
Supreme Court of Florida · 2024-04-01 · Published · cited 0×
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2022-1050 ____________ PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA, et al., Petitioners, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, et al., Respondents. ____________ No. SC2022-1127
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-03-18 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-09-03 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-03-16 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-01-14 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 3762693 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/201
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-02-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1975-11-11 · Published · cited 2× · 410 F. Supp. 770; 20 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1660
410 F.Supp. 770 (1975) A. C. SHERRILL, Plaintiff, and Robert H. Costner et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. J. P. STEVENS AND COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. C-C-73-12. United States District Court, W. D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. November 11, 1975. *771 *772
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2018-05-22 · Published · cited 4× · 189 A.3d 629; 182 Conn. App. 165
PER CURIAM. The plaintiff, Nicholas Adams, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles (commissioner), dismissing his appeal from the decision of the commissioner to suspend his motor vehicle operator's license, pursuant to General Statutes § 14-227b,