Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “George Springer and Debra Springer”
State Purchasing Div. v. George's Equip.public domain
783 P.2d 949 (1989) The STATE of Nevada, NEVADA STATE PURCHASING DIVISION, Appellant, v. GEORGE'S EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., Respondent. No. 18911. Supreme Court of Nevada. December 6, 1989. *950 Brian McKay, Atty. Gen. and Debra Winne Jepson, Deputy Atty. Gen., Carson City, for appellant. Woodburn, Wedge & Jeppson and W
Cite as 2023 Ark. 173 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-23-340 Opinion Delivered: November 30, 2023 ROBINSON NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC, APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI D/B/A ROBINSON NURSING AND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, SIXTH REHABILITATION CENTER DIVISION APPELLAN
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Cite as 2023 Ark. 175 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-23-340 Opinion Delivered: November 30, 2023 ROBINSON NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC, APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI D/B/A ROBINSON NURSING AND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, SIXTH REHABILITATION CENTER DIVISION APPELLAN
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Keach v. US TRUST CO., NApublic domain
246 F.Supp.2d 998 (2003) Debra KEACH and Patricia Sage, Plaintiffs, v. U.S. TRUST COMPANY, N.A., et al., Defendants. No. 01-1168. United States District Court, CD. Illinois, Peoria Division. February 28, 2003. *999 Dean B. Rhoads, Robert Rhode, Edward Sutkowski, Steven Oates and Sean Anderson, Sutkowski & Rhoads, Peoria, IL,
Keach v. US TRUST CO., NApublic domain
338 F.Supp.2d 931 (2004) Debra KEACH and Patricia Sage, Plaintiffs, v. U.S. TRUST COMPANY, N.A., et al., Defendants. No. 01-1168. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois. Peoria Division. October 8, 2004. *932 Dean B. Rhoads, Robert Rhode, Edward Sutkowski, Steven Oates, Sean Anderson, Sutkowski & Rhoads, Peoria, IL, for
Keach v. U.S. Trust Co.public domain
240 F.Supp.2d 840 (2002) Debra KEACH and Patricia Sage, Plaintiff, v. U.S. TRUST COMPANY, N.A., et al., Defendants. No. 01-1168. United States District Court, CD. Illinois, Peoria Division. December 18, 2002. *841 Dean B. Rhoads, Robert Rhode, Edward Sutkowski, Steven Oates, Sean Anderson, Gregory J. Pals, Sutkowski & Rhoads,
78 F.3d 620 316 U.S.App.D.C. 259 OMNIPOINT CORPORATION, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and the United States ofAmerica, Respondents.GO Communications Corporation, et al., Intervenors. Nos. 95-1374, 95-1391, 95-1409 and 95-1412. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Sept. 28, 1995.<
Keach v. US TRUST CO., NApublic domain
240 F.Supp.2d 832 (2002) Debra KEACH and Patricia Sage, Plaintiff, v. U.S. TRUST COMPANY, N.A., et al., Defendants. No. 01-1168. United States District Court, CD. Illinois. December 12, 2002. *834 Dean B. Rhoads, Robert Rhode, Edward Sutkowski, Steven Oates, Sean Anderson, Gregory J. Pals, Sutkowski & Rhoads, Peoria, IL, for
Keach v. US TRUST CO., NApublic domain
239 F.Supp.2d 820 (2002) Debra KEACH and Patricia Sage, Plaintiff, v. U.S. TRUST COMPANY, N.A., et al., Defendants. No. 01-1168. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Peoria Division. December 30, 2002. *821 Dean B. Rhoads, Robert Rhode, Edward Sutkowski, Steven Oates, Sean Anderson, Gregory J. Pals, Sutkowski & Rhoads
Keach v. US TRUST CO. NApublic domain
244 F.Supp.2d 968 (2003) Debra KEACH and Patricia Sage, Plaintiffs, v. U.S. TRUST COMPANY, N.A., et al., Defendants. No. 01-1168. United States District Court, CD. Illinois, Peoria Division. February 18, 2003. *970 Dean B. Rhoads, Robert Rhode, Edward Sutkowski, Steven Oates, Sean Anderson, Sutkowski & Rhoads, Peoria, IL, for
Keach v. US TRUST CO., NApublic domain
245 F.Supp.2d 941 (2003) Debra KEACH and Patricia Sage, Plaintiffs, v. U.S. TRUST COMPANY, N.A., et al., Defendants. No. 01-1168. United States District Court, CD. Illinois. February 24, 2003. *943 Dean B. Rhoads, Robert Rhode, Edward Sutkowski, Steven Oates, Sean Anderson, Sutkowski & Rhoads, Peoria, IL, for Plaintiffs.
Keach v. US TRUST CO., NApublic domain
235 F.Supp.2d 886 (2002) Debra KEACH and Patricia Sage, Plaintiffs, v. U.S. TRUST COMPANY, N.A., et al., Defendants. Case No. 01-1168. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Peoria Division. November 27, 2002. *887 *888 Dean B. Rhoads, Robert Rhode, Edward Sutkowski, Steven Oates, Sean A
Keach v. U.S. Trust Co., N.A.public domain
ORDER MICHAEL M. MIHM, District Judge. Now before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Stephen Bartley (“Bartley”), Michael Norbu-tas (“Norbutas”), and Frederick Stuber (“Stuber”). For the reasons set forth below, the Motion for Summary Judgment [# 416] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. FACTUAL BACKGROUND The basic factual backgro
Keach v. U.S. Trust Co., N.A.public domain
ORDER MIHM, District Judge. Now before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Gregory McAllister (“McAlister”). For the reasons set forth below, the Motion for Summary Judgment [# 418] is GRANTED. FACTUAL BACKGROUND The basic factual background has been sufficiently set forth in the prior orders of this Court, and familiarity therewi
Keach v. U.S. Trust Co., N.A.public domain
ORDER Now before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Ashley Anne Foster. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion for Summary Judgment [# 392] is GRANTED. FACTUAL BACKGROUND The basic factual background has been sufficiently set forth in the prior orders of this Court, and familiarity therewith is presumed. The present motion is brought by Ashley Anne Foster
Keach v. U.S. Trust Co., N.A.public domain
ORDER MIHM, District Judge. Now before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Liability Against Defendants Ellen D. Foster, as Executrix of the Estate of Thomas S. Foster, and Melvyn R. Regal: Admitted Failure to Disclose Material Information. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion for Summary Judgment [# 269] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
Keach v. U.S. Trust Co., N.A.public domain
ORDER MIHM, District Judge. Now before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Ellen D. Foster (“Mrs.Foster”), as Executrix of the Estate of Thomas S. Foster, and Mel-vyn R. Regal (“Regal”). As Mrs. Foster has previously been terminated as a party to this litigation in her capacity as the Executrix of the Estate, the portion of the present Motion addressed to claims asserted ag
Keach v. U.S. Trust Co., N.A.public domain
ORDER MIHM, District Judge. Now before the Court is Defendant U.S. Trust Company’s (“US Trust”) Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion for Summary Judgment [# 423] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. FACTUAL BACKGROUND The basic factual background has been sufficiently set forth in the prior orders of this Court, and f