Cases

59 Cal.Rptr.3d 142 (2007) 41 Cal.4th 160 158 P.3d 718 Marc ANGELUCCI et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CENTURY SUPPER CLUB, Defendant and Respondent. No. S136154. Supreme Court of California. May 31, 2007. *143 Superior Court, Los Angeles County; Joseph R. Kalin[*].</

169 Cal.App.4th 523 (2008) MICHAEL COHN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CORINTHIAN COLLEGES, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. G038388. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three. November 21, 2008. *525 Alfred G. Rava for Plaintiff and Appellant. Payne & Fears, Daniel L. Rasmussen and Jul

COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge. In this appeal, we have occasion to consider the effect of jury verdicts acquitting *594 one alleged conspirator and convicting the sole other alleged conspirator on the same count in the same trial. Specifically, the convicted conspirator argues that the “rule of consi

SMITH, Judge. Relators appeal from the judgment of the trial court quashing an alternative writ of mandamus and dismissing their petition. Relators are corporals in the St. Louis Police Department. Defendants were the Board of Police Commissioners of the City of St. Louis.1 The petition sought a writ of mandamus to compel the respondents to promote relators to the rank of sergeant with retroactive

MEMORANDUM OPINION DOWD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs, MDC Acquisition Co. (“MDC”) and GRH Enterprises, Inc. (“GRH”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), brought this declaratory relief action seeking a declaration that defendant Travelers’ Property Casualty Company of America (“Travelers” or “Defendant”), has a duty to defend and indemnify Plaintiffs in a putative clas

CRIST, Judge. Movant seeks to set aside his conviction for three counts of robbery entered on January 1, 1974. His conviction and sentence was affirmed on appeal. 528 S.W.2d 503 (Mo.App.1975). On July 14, 1976, movant filed a Rule 27.26 motion to set aside judgment and sentence. Movant asserted ineffective assistance of counsel and jury incompetence as his grounds for relief. An evidentiary hearing was held on this motion on

Xavier C. Riccobono, J. Defendant moves to dismiss, pursuant to CPLR 3211, upon the grounds that this court lacks jurisdiction of both the subject matter and the person of the defendant. To the extent that the application is based upon the former ground, it is wholly without merit (see Rosenbloom v. Rudd, 31 N. Y. S. 2d 821). *51

SMITH, Judge. Appellants in 38661 appeal from the action of the trial court in making permanent a writ prohibiting them, as the members of the Board of Police Commissioners of the City of St. Louis, from holding a disciplinary hearing of respondent, a captain in the Police Department. We dissolve the permanent writ. Appellant Moran in 38881, an appeal consolidated with that of appellants, seeks to reverse the action of the t

499 S.W.2d 798 (1973) STEPHEN AND STEPHEN PROPERTIES, INC., Appellant, v. STATE TAX COMMISSION of Missouri, Respondent. No. 57018. Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1. September 10, 1973. Motion for Rehearing or for Transfer or for Modification of Opinion Denied October 8, 1973. *799 Lashly, Caruthers, Rava

PER CURIAM. This diversity litigation was generated by a collision on February 8, 1966, between a Jaguar automobile which was being driven and operated by Samuel N. Alexander and a motor truck. The vital question in controversy is whether prior to that date the title to the Jaguar had been conveyed to Alexander in conformity with the provisions of the applicable Missouri Statutes. Marilyn Schaefer, an occupant in the Jagua

472 S.W.2d 637 (1971) STATE of Missouri ex rel. The Honorable Gene McNARY, Prosecuting Attorney, St. Louis County, Missouri, Relator, v. The Honorable Douglas L. C. JONES, Judge, Division Five, Twenty-first Judicial Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri, Respondent. No. 34249. St. Louis Court of Appeals, Missouri. July 27, 1971. Motion for Rehearing or to T

Filed 6/30/14 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA MARIA AYALA et al., ) ) Plaintiffs and Appellants, ) ) S206874 v. ) ) Ct.App. 2/4 B235484 ANTELOPE VALLEY NEWSPAPERS, ) INC., ) Los Angeles County

694 F.Supp.2d 1192 (2009) In re WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & ERISA LITIGATION. In re Washington Mutual, Inc. Securities Litigation This Document Relates to: All Cases. Case Nos. 2:08-md-1919 MJP, C08-387 MJP. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. October 27, 2009. *1202 James Abram Har

385 F.Supp. 907 (1974) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. RAYMOND METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY, a subsidiary of Raymond International, Inc., and the United Steelworkers of America and its Local 6414. Civ. A. No. 73-320-N. United States District Court, D. Maryland. November 26, 1974. *908 *909

HEANEY, Circuit Judge. We are asked by the State of Missouri and by three groups of parents to set aside the plan of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri for integrating the public schools of St. Louis. The State argues that it has been required to pay too much toward the integration plan and that it should not be ordered to participate in developing either a voluntary or an involuntary inter

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SUSTAINING MOTION OF DEFENDANTS ST. LOUIS INSURANCE COMPANY, ST. LOUIS FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY AND INSURANCE COMPANY OF ST. LOUIS FOR REALIGNMENT AS PARTIES PLAINTIFF. DUNCAN, Senior District Judge. This is a stockholders’ derivative action, and the matter now before the Court is the motion of defendants St. Louis Insurance Company, St. Louis Fire and Marine Insurance Compan

561 S.W.2d 119 (1977) Lawrence V. TESON, David Behle, Nancy Behle, Joseph Harry Keeven, Mary Catherine Keeven, Matthew Klaus, Florence Klaus, Charles Sommers and Margaret Sommers, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Velma VASQUEZ, Executrix of the Estate of Leo Vasquez and Velma Vasquez, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 37003, 37004, 37506, 37608 and 37609. Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division Thr

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs, Charles Koen, Percy Green, Richard P. Koch and Joe Allen, from a final order entered after trial on the merits dismissing the plaintiffs' petition for injunctive relief against certain police, prosecution, and court practices, and a declaration that certain St. Louis ordinances are unconstitutional. The defendants are various city

571 S.W.2d 697 (1978) Eric STEGEMANN, Appellant-Respondent, v. William FAUK et al., Respondents-Appellants. Nos. 38522, 38543. Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division Four. August 8, 1978. *698 London & Greenberg, Burton M. Greenberg, St. Louis, Paul B. Rava, Richard D. Watters, Lashly, Caruthers, Thies, Rava