Cases

493 F.Supp.2d 958 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jorge PAREDES-LIMA, et al., Defendants. No. 3:04cr086 (1-7). United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. August 22, 2005. *959 *960 John Hayes Rion, Jon Paul Rion, Rion Rion and Rion LPA Inc., Nicholas George Gouna

825 S.W.2d 733 (1992) The STATE of Texas, Appellant, v. Jefferson LIMA, Appellee. No. C14-91-0459-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist). January 23, 1992. Kimberly Aperauch Stelter, Houston, for State. George J. Parnham, Henry L. Burkholder, III, Houston, for appellee. Before JUNELL, ROBERTSON and DRAUGN, JJ. OPINION <

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JEFFREY D. CONNELL; JANET No. 19-35797 CONNELL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 1:16-cv-00456- v. CWD LIMA CORPORATE; LIMA USA, INC., an Indiana corporation, OPINION Defendants-Appellees, DJO GLOBAL, INC., a Delaware corporation; ENCORE MEDICA

DUNSTON, Judge of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands MEMORANDUM OPINION (October 22, 2012) Pending before the Court is Defendant Alejandro Lima’s September 17, 2012, Motion for Judgment of Acquittal and September 17, 2012, Motion for New Trial. Defendant’s Motions will be denied.1 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In an

ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge. Defendants Lima Memorial Hospital and its president, Gregory Turner, appeal the district court’s denial of summary judgment in plaintiff Dr. William L. Manion’s antitrust action based upon the theory of bad faith peer review. The district court held that there was a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the Health Care Quality Improvemen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELISEO LIMA LUCERO, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 18-515 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 71, 73

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELISEO LIMA LUCERO : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 18-0515 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 23 :

JUSTICE STOUDER delivered the opinion of the court: The plaintiff, Lima Lake Drainage District of Adams County, filed suit against the defendant, Hunt Drainage District of Hancock County, for breach of contract. The plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that the defendant had failed to remove the internal waters from a 692-' acre area of land within the defendant district and had al

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHARLES STEPHAN LIMA, No. 17-16299 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:15-cv-00242-KSC UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, OPINION Defendant, and EDUCATIONAL CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal fro

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHARLES STEPHAN LIMA, No. 17-16299 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:15-cv-00242-KSC UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ORDER AND Defendant, AMENDED OPINION and EDUCATIONAL CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

OPINION {¶ 1} Plaintiff-Appellants James C. White ("James") and Carline ("Carline") White appeal from the November 16, 2007 Final Judgment Entry of the Court of Common Pleas, Allen County, Ohio disposing of all claims contained in the original complaint filed against Defendant-Appellees Lima Auto Mall, Inc. ("Auto Mall") and GMAC, as well as a counterclaim filed by GMAC. {¶ 2}

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-09-00109-CR

412 Pa. 299 (1963) Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation Appeal. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 29, 1963. October 10, 1963. Before BELL, C.J., MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN and ROBERTS, JJ. *300 R. Paul Lessy, for appellant. Philip B. Driver, Jr., with him Ronald C. Unterberger, Francis J.

Opinion by Montgomery, J., The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania condemned a strip of appellant’s land in Delaware County and upon appellant’s petition to the Quarter Sessions Court of that county viewers were appointed to assess the damages for such taking. The viewers filed their report with the Quarter Sessions Court on February 13, 1964, and no exceptions to it having been filed, it was confirmed on or about Mar

KENDALL, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (June 18, 2004) THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant’s “Motion for Judgment of Acquittal,” and “Conditional Motion for a New Trial” pursuant to Rules 29(c) and 29(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant files these Motions after having been tried and convicted by a jury of Voluntary Manslaughter in violation of Title 1

115 F.2d 861 (1940) ATWOOD et al. v. NATIONAL BANK OF LIMA. No. 8374. Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. December 3, 1940. *862 George S. Moss, George E. Taylor, and Robert A. Kelb, all of Toledo, Ohio, for appellants. Leslie Reid, of Lima, Ohio, for appellee. Before SIMONS, HAMILTON, and MARTIN, Circuit Judge

180 F.Supp.2d 941 (2001) Dale Dean LUTZ, et al., Plaintiffs v. Hon. George F. SMITH, et al., Defendants No. 3:00CV7687. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. November 26, 2001. *942 *943 Bruce C. French, Lima, OH, for Plaintiffs. Cheri B. Hass, Marc A. Fishel, Rufus

200 B.R. 322 (1996) In re George A. HENDERSON, Debtor. George A. HENDERSON, Plaintiff, v. Susan K. HENDERSON, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 95-32696. Adversary No. 95-3315. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. August 13, 1996. *323 Nancy Schramski, Lima, OH, for Plaintiff. Randy Reeves, Lima, OH, fo

492 F.2d 1074 1974-1 Trade Cases 74,946 George P. BAKER et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION et al.,Defendants-Appellants, Edgewater Steel Company, Defendant. Nos. 386, 596 to 599, Dockets 73-2200, 73-2218, 73-2394 to 73-2396. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued Dec. 13, 1973.Decided

MEMORANDUM *** Clay Roselle appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his Fourth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights during the course of a civil forfeiture action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Orff v. United States, 358 F.3d 1137, 1142 (9th Cir.2004) (sovereign immunity); Hernandez v