Cases

2006 NY Slip Op 08640 THE PEOPLE & C., Respondent, v. UBALDO ROMERO, Appellant. 151. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided November 21, 2006. William A. Loeb, for appellant. Susan Gliner, for respondent. Opinion by Judge Graffeo. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Read, Smith and Pigott concur. GRAFFEO, J.:

456 U.S. 645 (1982) WOELKE & ROMERO FRAMING, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL. No. 80-1798. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 3, 1982. Decided May 24, 1982.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *647 John W. Prager, Jr., argued the

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, againstJoy Wade, Appellant. Andrew E. MacAskill, for appellant. Nassau County District Attorney (Yael V. Levy and Amanda Manning of counsel), for respondent. Appeal from judgments of the District Court of Nassau County, First District (Joseph B. Girardi, J.), rendered July 11, 2016. The judgments convicted defendant, upon

46 Cal.4th 364 (2009) ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ ___ P.3d ___ KAREN L. STRAUSS et al., Petitioners, v. MARK B. HORTON, as State Registrar of Vital Statistics, etc., et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. ROBIN TYLER et al., Petitioners, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO e

85 Ariz. 263 (1959) 336 P.2d 366 STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Jesse Cruz ROMERO, Appellant. No. 1122. Supreme Court of Arizona. March 4, 1959. Rehearing Denied March 31, 1959. *264 John M. Levy, Phoenix, and Emmett R. Feighner, Phoenix, of counsel, for appellant. Robert Morrison,

*327Opinion ASHMANN-GERST, J. United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA) appeals a judgment entered upon a consent decree after the trial court conducted a fairness hearing and gave the consent decree final approval.1 The consent decree was reached between the Los Angeles Unified School District (District), the Partnership for Los An

377 F.Supp. 1004 (1974) Sarah TAYLOR and Charles Taylor v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND, and Jay Harrington. Civ. No. 73-1113-HM. United States District Court, D. Maryland. July 1, 1974. *1005 Yale L. Goldberg, and Lawrence A. Hoffman, Silver Spring, Md., for plaintiffs. Patrick A. O'Doherty, Baltimore, Md., for defend

ORDER CECILIA M. ALTONAG4, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendants, Confederación Sudamericana de Fútbol (“Conmebol”), Fuji Play Group, S.A., and Alejandro Burzaco’s Consolidated Jurisdictional Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 203] Plaintiffs, GolTV, Inc. and Global Sports Partners LLP’s Amended Complaint [ECF No. 78]. The Court has carefully considered the Amended Complaint,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1157 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. HENRI SALVADOR GUTIERREZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]

MEMORANDUM LEGROME D. DAVIS, District Judge. I. Introduction This case concerns the rightful ownership of ten (10) gold coins minted by the United States Government here in Philadelphia almost eighty years ago. The coins in dispute, produced by the Philadelphia Mint in 1933, are $20 gold pieces known as “Double Eagles.” Famed sculptor Augustus SainNGaudens designed the

Egan Jr., J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered September 5, 2008, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. On the evening of May 30, 2007, the victim was sitting in his *912friend. Megan Adams’ parked vehicle

Supreme Court of Louisiana FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #023 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 5th day of May, 2015, are as follows: BY GUIDRY, J.: 2013-C -2878 JAMES CLIFFORD ARRANT, ET AL. v. GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL, C/W INC., ET AL. C/W MARVIN JACK BARNETT, JR., ET AL. v. GRAPHIC 2013-C -2981 PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. C

Opinion GEORGE, C. J. In this case we consider whether Government Code section 17581 and certain budget measures that suspend the operation of administrative regulations adopted by the Department of Industrial Relations violate the separation of powers clause of the California Constitution by encroaching on the power of the executive branch of government. (Cal. Const., art. Ill, § 3.) We conclude that no separ

104 F.Supp.2d 538 (2000) Andrew D. LEVY, Plaintiff, v. C.D. (Dan) MOTE, Jr., et al., Defendants. No. H-99-3072. United States District Court, D. Maryland. July 11, 2000. *539 C. Christopher Brown, Brown, Goldstein & Levy, Baltimore, MD, for plaintiff. Dawna M. Cobb, Assist. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, MD, for defendants.

*863Opinion GEORGE, C. J. Two principal issues are presented in this case. The first is whether defendant was entitled to be released from custody on his own recognizance (OR), subject to reasonable conditions, when his preliminary examination was continued for good cause beyond the 10-day period specified i

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 12-4574 ___________ ROY LANGBORD; DAVID LANGBORD; JOAN LANGBORD v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; UNITED STATES BUREAU OF THE MINT; SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; ACTING GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE T

650 F.3d 350 (2011) Luisa PEREZ; Elvin Francisco Gonza Osovio, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Mountaire Farms of Delaware, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Ray Barrientos; Maria Gomez; Juana Miguel; Gibran Moya Rivera; Gloria Paneto Castro; Shitwa Perez Lopez; Jose Antonio Santiag Lugo; Maritza Alcover

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;