Cases

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

Cite as 2017 Ark. 150 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF opinion Deliveted April 21,, 201'7 ATTORNEYS'WHO FAILED TO PAY 2017 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 201.7 annual attorney-license fee was April !7, 201"7.1 Rule VII(C) of the Rules

Cite as 2017 Ark. 222 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE UPDATED LIST OF Opinion Delivered June 8, 2017 ATTORNEYS SUSPENDED FOR FAILURE TO PAY 2017 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On April 21, 2017, we issued an opinion pursuant to Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar identifying attorneys who were suspended from the practice of law

[Cite as State v. Williams, 2022-Ohio-2517.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 2021-CA-66 : v.

19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, two organizations and thirteen children and their parents representing a class of individuals, filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that defendants, officials of the State of Oklahoma and the Oklahoma Health Care Authority, violated various provisions of the Medicaid Act by failing to provide Medicaid-eligible children in the State of

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA

2023 IL App (5th) 230035 NOTICE Decision filed 01/31/23. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-23-0035 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT _______________________________________________________________

WELBAUM, P.J. {¶ 1} In this case, Defendant-Appellant Direct Energy, L.P. ("DE") appeals from a judgment in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen Becker, on claims for breach of an employment agreement and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing. After a jury trial, the jury awarded Becker $655,733.44 in damages and rejected Becker's claim for defamation. {

505 F.Supp.2d 1129 (2007) HIGHLAND DEVELOPMENT, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. DUCHESNE COUNTY, et al., Defendants. No. 203-CV-750 TC. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. March 2, 2007. *1130 *1131 Darrel J. Bostwick, Bostwick & Price, Mary Anne Q. Wood, David J. Crapo,

102 F.Supp.2d 1280 (2000) Peter H. BURKE et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Harold RUTTENBERG, et al., Defendants. George W. Massey, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Harold Ruttenberg, et al., Defendants. Nos. CV99-BU-3097-S, CV99-BU-3129-S. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division.<

934 A.2d 1009 (2007) 177 Md. App. 102 Mary L. REESE, Guardian v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE. No. 514 Sept. Term, 2006. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. November 2, 2007. *1011 Daniel L. Robinowitz (Nirali D. Patel, Sidley Austin, LLP, on the brief), Washington, DC, for Appellant. K

OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge: This multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) proceeding, comprised of nineteen cases, pits States and the District of Columbia (collectively, the “States”) against a national credit-rating agency, McGraw Hill Financial, Inc. (formerly the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.) and its subsidiary, Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (collectively, “S &

Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di

200 Va. 530 (1959) VIRGINIA BRUCE BROOKS v. WILLIAM F. BROOKS. Record No. 4858. Supreme Court of Virginia. January 26, 1959. T. Stokeley Coleman (William A. Wright; G. Kenneth Miller; May, Garrett, Miller & Newman, on brief), for the appellant. Present, All the Justices. 1. Brooks filed his bill for divorce from appellant alleging cruelty tanta

215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams

410 F.Supp. 770 (1975) A. C. SHERRILL, Plaintiff, and Robert H. Costner et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. J. P. STEVENS AND COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. C-C-73-12. United States District Court, W. D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. November 11, 1975. *771 *772

ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

THACKER, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from the dismissal of three consumer actions based on Virginia state law claims. The actions focus on a series of misrepresentations made by Hyundai Motor America ("Hyundai") regarding the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") estimated fuel economy for the 2011, 2012, and 2013 models of the Hyundai Elantra. A Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") consolidated dozens of si