Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RICHARD HORNSBY, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 22-1472 (RC) : 23-3204 (RC) v. :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RICHARD HORNSBY, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 22-1472 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 8 : SA

HATCHETT, Circuit Judge: On October 1, 1982, the Alabama National Guard employed David Stinson, a black resident citizen of Montgomery County, Alabama, on a full time basis, as Training NCO/System Supervisor. It terminated him on September 29, 1985. Stinson alleged that the Alabama National Guard prohibited and refused to allow him the opportunity to gain a supervisory position, allowed white employees, with equal or fewer

666 F.3d 296 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andre J. HORNSBY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-5267. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: October 28, 2011. Decided: January 25, 2012. *300 ARGUED: Robert Charles Bonsib, Marcus & Bonsib, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant.

REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge The plaintiffs filed this civil action, using the pseudonyms Jane Does 1 to 5, against George Washington University ("GW") and Kyle Renner, a GW employee being sued in his capacity as GW's General Operations Manager and the plaintiffs' supervisor (collectively, "the defendants"), pursuant to the District of Columbia's Human Rights Act ("D.C. Human Rights Act"),

1 The two persons named as appellees no longer hold the public offices indicated in this style. Their successors have been "automatically substituted" as parties. See Rule 43(b), Ala. R. App. P. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 934 E.C. "Sonny" Hornsby, former Chief

That we sustained the action of the trial court in overruling appellant's motion to strike from the indictment the words "alias George H. Scott," is seriously urged as error in the motion for rehearing by appellant. We find ourselves unable agree to this contention after more mature reflection. Articles 559-560-567, Vernon's C.C.P., do not apply. As we understand those articles of our statute, one who is indicted under another than his true name may suggest that fact, and thereupon the true n

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) JANE DOE 1, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 18-1391 (RBW) ) THE GEORGE WASHINGTON )

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-414-CV CARL GAVREL APPELLANT V. MARK LIEBERMAN AND APPELLEES GEORGE ONZO ------------ FROM THE 141ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

<

The sole error complained of is that the evidence was insufficient to support a verdict of guilty of grand larceny. We have examined it and are of the opinion that there was ample testimony to justify the verdict and judgment of the court. It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment be — Affirmed. WHITFIELD, BUFORD, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, J. J., concur. BROWN, C. J., TERRELL and ADAMS, J. J., dissent.

This is an appeal from the trial court's grant of a new trial pursuant to Rule 60(b)(2), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure. We affirm. The plaintiffs, Rankin and Dorothy Barnes, owned a pet chow dog named Brutus. On September 10, 1987, Mrs. Barnes took the dog to the veterinary clinic owned and operated by the defendants, Dr. Ann Branch and Dr. Ben F. George, Jr. The Barneses alleged that while their pet was at the clinic, Dr. George injured the dog by kicking him. Brutus died t

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS CONSTABLE JACK F. ABERCIA AND OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. KINGVISION PAY-PER-VIEW, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

821 F.2d 1537 44 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 594,43 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,256David STINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Major General William A. HORNSBY, individually and as theAdjutant General of the Alabama National Guard, State ofAlabama; the Alabama National Guard; Major Ernest L.Shipp, individually and as an officer of the AlabamaNational Guard; Lt. Col. John Q. Adams, individually and asan officer of the Alabama Nati

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On November 2, 2018, the Court entered a Memorandum Opinion and Omnibus Order *706(Doc. No. 823) that resolved most of the pending motions in this case. The remaining Motions were set for oral arguments or evidentiary hearings, and they were held during the last week of November 2018.

This case involves a stockholders' dispute within a family-owned corporation. The trial court upheld a stipulation of settlement made in open court by counsel for the parties. The plaintiffs appeal. We affirm. The Frances F. Green Corporation is a close corporation formed in Montgomery, Alabama, on December 31, 1973, by nine stockholders, who are brothers and sisters, for the purpose of managing jointly held property. On December 1, 1987, stockholders Annie M. Lee, Mary Griffin

On the first appeal of this case, Shirley v. Mazzone,591 So.2d 469 (Ala. 1991), the trial judge was instructed to determine and consider precisely what representation by Mazzone's attorneys in fact benefited all of the tenants in common, and to adjust its original award accordingly. The order of the trial court dated March 19, 1992, indicates that the court substantially complied with the instruction of this Court. Therefore, we affirm.

75 F.Supp.2d 666 (1999) FAIRMONT TRAVEL, INC. v. GEORGE S. MAY INT'L CO., Sam Elkuka, Richard Bittman, Vernon Moore, John Bates, Michael Leonpacher, and Joseph Rembusch. No. Civ.A. G-99-559. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. November 16, 1999. *667 Don Allen Weitinger, Attorney at Law, Houston, TX, for

*792ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART SUMMARY JUDGMENT HENRY T. WINGATE, District Judge. In this lawsuit, defendant and counter-plaintiff Clydine Daniel (“C. Daniel”) has filed counter-claims against the original plaintiff, Illinois Central Railroad Company (“ICRR”), accusing ICRR of negligently causing the death of her husband, Michael Danie

Collins, J. The question of law presented in this appeal is whether the sureties named in, and who signed, an instrument designed to be the bond required, under 1878 G-. S. ch. 26, § 2, of a person about to be appointed a notary public, are bound by its conditions when the principal has failed to sign the same. The instrument purported to be the joint and several obligation of “A. H. Hornsby as principal, and U. L. Lamprey and Ch