Cases

RAY THORNTON, Justice. This appeal concerns the validity of an initiative petition that was sponsored and filed by appellant, Oscar Stilley. This initiative petition proposed to require Jefferson County, Arkansas (“County”), to sell its county hospital, known as Jefferson Regional Medical Center (“JRMC”). The ballot title and petition clearly stated that Oscar Stilley, attorney at law, would

Per Curiam. On October 19, 2000, appellant and intervenor Oscar Stilley filed the instant motion asking this court to enter a stay of the Jefferson County Circuit Court’s August 29, 2000 order “by October 12, 2000, or if that is impossible, at the earliest time.” (Emphasis added.) Clearly, it is impossible for us to grant appellant’s request to enter a stay on October 12th, seven days before he actually filed

*320OPINION OF THE COURT Mazzabelli, J. In March 2004, plaintiff retained defendant Henry Loheac, P.C. to provide architectural services for plaintiff’s planned conversion of premises it leased into a day care center. Plaintiff alleges that it advised Loheac that it intended to begin operating the day care center in January 2005. Plaintiff also claims

669 F.Supp.2d 201 (2009) George MAKRIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SPENSIERI PAINTING, LLC., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 08-1718 (RLA). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 17, 2009. Ramón M. González-Santiago, Esq., San Juan, PR, Dennis J. Cruz-Pérez, Esq., Ponce, PR, for Plaintiff/Petitioner. Paul E. Calvesbert-Borgos, Esq., Manolo T. Rodríg

CLARK, Circuit Judge: This is the second appeal emanating from the 1972 federal perjury conviction of Michael A. S. Makris for falsely testifying before the Securities and Exchange Commission. Pursuant to the mandate of this court issued in defendant’s first appeal, the district court conducted a nunc pro tunc competency hearing to determine whether Makris wa

398 F.Supp. 507 (1975) UNITED STATES of America v. Michael A. S. MAKRIS. Cr. No. 72-H-92. United States District Court, S. D. Texas, Houston Division. July 16, 1975. *508 Edward B. McDonough, Jr., U. S. Atty., James R. Gough, Alvin A. Horne and George A. Kelt, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff. David Be

143 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 456 (1991) 599 A.2d 279 James MAKRIS, Petitioner, v. BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL AFFAIRS, State Board of Psychology, Respondents. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted September 10, 1991. Decided November 14, 1991. *460 William Butler, IV, for petitioner.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-KA-00807-COA JOHNNY MAX MOUNT, JR. A/K/A JOHNNY APPELLANT MAX MOUNT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/20/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LISA P. DODSON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HARRISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,

CRABTREE, J. T. C. Plaintiffs seek a refund of inheritance tax paid with respect to certain inter vivos transfers made by decedent within three years of his death. Defendant claims that the transfers were subject to tax as having been made in contemplation of death within the purview of N.J.S.A. 54:34-l(c). Argiris Fantis died testate at the age of 81 on July 5, 1972, a resident of Fort

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GLASSER, District Judge. Plaintiffs filed this action in March of 2001 making claims under the Sherman Act, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, the Lanham Act, and California unfair competition laws, as well as other state law claims, against defendants A.H.R.M.A. Ltd. d/b/a American Historic Racing Motorcycle Association (“AHRMA”), and current and former n

376 F.Supp. 149 (1973) George P. BAKER et al., Plaintiffs, v. SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN SHIPPERS CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION, a/k/a SEMCO, Inc., a Michigan corporation, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 39090. United States District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D. September 28, 1973. *150 *151 John G. Makris, Detr

EDGERTON, Circuit Judge. Appellant entered the United States lawfully as a seaman in 1948 and has been here ever since. In 1954 he filed his complaint for a declaratory judgment and for review under the Administrative Procedure Act [5 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq.] of the Attorney General’s refusal to suspend a deportation order. The complain

45 B.R. 843 (1984) FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, v. TRANSPORT INDEMNITY COMPANY, a California corporation and the Central National Insurance Company of Omaha, Nebraska, a Nebraska corporation, Defendant and Counter-Plaintiffs, v. AUTOMOBILE TRANSPORT, INC., a Michigan corporation, and Alexander Andrews, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Automobile Transport, Inc., Additional Defendants on Counterclaim. In re AUTOMOBILE T

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant R-Goshen LLC (“RGoshen”) appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Colleen McMahon, Judge) denying plaintiff-appellant’s motion for summary judgment and granting defendants-appellees’ cross-motion for summary judgment. The district court held that (1) the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against defendant-appellee Weldon A. Abt was not actionable because,

Baxter v Jada Constr. & Dev., Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 03034) Baxter v Jada Constr. & Dev., Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 03034 Decided on May 21, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursu

289 F.Supp.2d 441 (2003) R-GOSHEN LLC, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF GOSHEN, Marcia Mattheus, Welson A. Abt, Jerome O'Donnell, Elaine McClung, Roger A. Pikul, Reynell Andrews, George Urbanick, Baxter's Pharmacy and John Nemeth, Defendants. No. 02 CIV.4302(CM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 29, 2003. *442 Robert

Mercedes v Cool Wind Ventilation Corp. (2024 NY Slip Op 00380) Mercedes v Cool Wind Ventilation Corp. 2024 NY Slip Op 00380 Decided on January 30, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pu

41 B.R. 433 (1984) FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, v. TRANSPORT INDEMNITY COMPANY, a California corporation and the Central National Insurance Company of Omaha, Nebraska, a Nebraska corporation, Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs, v. AUTOMOBILE TRANSPORT, INC., a Michigan corporation, and Alexander Andrews, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Automobile Transport, Inc., Additional Defendants on Counterclaim. In re AUTOMOBILE

Graciano Corp. v Lanmark Group, Inc. (2020 NY Slip Op 03266) Graciano Corp. v Lanmark Group, Inc. 2020 NY Slip Op 03266 Decided on June 11, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Repor

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Defendant appeals his convictions on two grounds. He first argues that the district court erred in ruling him competent to stand trial and in failing to grant a mistrial and hold a third competency hearing after his behavior at trial. Second, defendant urges that the government failed to prove his status as a convicted felon, requiring rever