Cases

Case: 24-40703 Document: 96-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/28/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-40703 FILED

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-50549 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:13-cr-03921-BEN-1 MICHAEL LUSTIG, AKA George, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the So

Justice Boyd delivered the opinion of the Court. A former assistant district attorney filed this suit alleging that the county wrongfully terminated his employment because he refused his supervisor's order to withhold exculpatory evidence from a criminal defendant. The trial court dismissed the suit for lack of jurisdiction, and the court of appeals affirmed. Because we agree with those

Not surprisingly, the Legislature and Governor have concluded that the taxpayers' plight is intolerable. After all, "for at least 125 years, we have assumed and sometimes held that double taxation is forbidden." 3 Last year, the Legislature enacted, and the Governor signed into law, a statute authorizing property owners subject to the multiple taxation to p

Opinion Laura Carter Higley, Justice This eminent-domain case involves a dispute over the fair market value of 2.072 acres of land, acquired by the State from the Chana family fpr the purpose of constructing a detention pond associated with the roadway expansion of FM 529. On appeal, the State challenges the trial court’s judgment, which awarded the Cha-

ACCEPTED 04-14-00809-CR FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 4/7/2015 3:28:32 PM

Mark S. Davis, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Bentley Motors Limited and Bentley Motors, Inc. (collectively "Defendants" or "Bentley"), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 33. For the reasons stated below, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. I. FACTUAL and PROCEDURAL HISTORY

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, District Judge. Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 25), filed by Defendants Bank of America, N.A., as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, as successor to Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., and U.S. Bank, N.A., as trustee for the Certificate-Holders of the LXS 2006-16N Trust Fund. For the reasons that follow, Defendan

ACCEPTED 13-15-00119-CV FILED THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS

OPINION Appellant, Curtis A. Brooks, was convicted and fined $500 after pleading no contest in a municipal court of record to violating the City of Houston's sign code ordinance by "using" a sign without first obtaining a permit from the city. Presenting five issues, appellant appealed the municipal court's judgment to a county criminal court at law, which affirmed. Appellant now appeals the county criminal court's judgment. We affirm. <

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

Michael H. Simon, District Judge. Plaintiff Quatama Park Townhomes Owners Association ("Association") brings *1132this lawsuit (Quatama II ) against six defendants. Four defendants, Scott McFerran ("McFerran"), Laura Wilson ("Wilson"), Daron Anderson ("Anderson"), and Decatur Advisors LLC ("Decatur") (collectively, the "Moving Def

397 F.Supp.2d 726 (2005) UNITED STATES of America v. Ismael Juarez CISNEROS, Defendant. No. CRIM.A. 04-283. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. July 21, 2005. *727 Patricia Giles, Ronald Walutes, Assistant United States Attorneys, United States Attorneys Office, Alexandria, VA, for Plaintiff's Attorn

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

259 F.Supp.2d 118 (2003) SMIT AMERICAS, INC., for itself and on behalf of Edward J. Hosking, its employee, Plaintiff, v. THE M/T MANTINIA, her engines, tackle, machinery and other appurtenances, in Rem, and Metro Freighting Corp., and certain London and U.S. Underwriters of Insurance including Lloyd's of London who are insurers of the M/T Mantinia and the West of England Shipowners Protection and Indemnity Association (Luxembourg) Ltd., her liabi

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering, etc., the plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated January 29, 1991, as, upon the granting of a motion by the defendant George E. Wantz pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law, dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against George E. Wantz. Ordered that the judgment is modified

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum in Support, filed November 4, 2015 (Doc. 22)(“Mo-*1013tion”). The Court held a hearing on December 1, 2015. The primary issues are: (i) whether the propose

NUMBER 13-00-093-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ___________________________________________________________________ SANDRA LARSON , Appellant, v. FAMILY VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTIO

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 9, 2018 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Cl

591 F.3d 209 (2009) Sanjuanita SEPULVEDA; Angela Salinas; Jose Sanchez Rivera, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated; David Bailey; Sean Bradham; Clara Bennett; Victor Burgos Rivera; Vence Byrd; Hada Cardenas; Angel Colmenares; Yachira Davila; Hector Esmurria; Garvina Gibbs; Margaret Gibbs; Roger Gonzales; Patricia Gutierrez; Selena Hancock; Cesar Hernandez; Pattie Hinton; William Jackson; Thomas Jacobs; Robin Lott; Maricruz Luyando; Maria