Cases

Lisa "White Hardwick, Judge Ronald Miller appeals from the circuit court’s judgment dismissing his negligence claim against George Sams. He contends he stated a cause of action for negligence. Alternatively, he argues that the court erred in denying his request to file an amended petition to add allegations to the claim. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because no

10/02/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 15, 2019 Session GEORGE E. MILLER ET AL. v. TRH HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sevier County No. 16-11-368 Telford E. Forgety, Jr., Chancellor ______

OPINION AND ORDER JOSÉ ANTONIO FUSTÉ, District Judge. We consider the defendants’ motion to dismiss on Eleventh Amendment immunity and absolute immunity grounds. I. Background George Miller, a disabled veteran, alleges that the defendants conspired with his former landlord to discriminate against him based on the eviction ca

WOOD, Chief Judge. The invention of carbonless copy paper by NCR Corporation in the mid-1950s solved a small problem and created a large one. Though it alleviated the messy side effects of carbon paper for those who wanted copies in the pre-photocopy era, over the next quarter-century it became clear that the cost of this convenience was large-scale environmental contamination. That is because, until the early 1970s, the subst

OPINION GARCIA, Judge. {1} Three of the remainder beneficiaries (Beneficiaries) of their . father’s two testamentary trusts appeal a judgment awarding them damages in an amount lower than they claimed that the trust Beneficiaries were entitled to recover. The trustee, Bank of America (the Bank), cross-appeals. The Bank’s cross-appeal challenges the court’s determination of liabi

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lebowitz, J.), dated September 11, 2013, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

795 F.Supp.2d 317 (2011) Victor Jerome WALTHOUR, Sr., Plaintiff, v. George MILLER, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 09-5289. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 10, 2011. *319 Victor Jerome Walthour, Sr., Garnet Valley, PA, pro se. Suzanne McDonough, Holsten & Associates, Media, PA, for Defendant.

KITCHENS, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶1. In 2013, Lauderdale County contracted with Norman Enterprises, Inc., a roofing company, to repair the roof of the Ulmer Building in Meridian, Mississippi. George Waltman, an employee of Norman Enterprises, fell through the roof while performing work. Waltman sued Engineering Plus, Inc., the project engineer, claiming it should have warned

935 N.E.2d 729 (2010) In re the General Power of Attorney of Xenia S. MILLER. In re the J. Irwin Miller Trust Agreement Dated September 25, 1999, as Amended. Hugh Th. Miller, Appellant-Interested-Party, v. William Irwin Miller and Sarla Kalsi, Appellees-Attorneys-in-Fact. No. 03A01-0912-CV-586. Court of Appeals of Indiana. September 30, 2010.

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, District Judge. In this CERCLA contribution action, Plaintiffs have moved for summary judg*1115ment on the Defendants’ state law counterclaims, arguing (primarily) that such claims are preempted by CERCLA. Plaintiff Appleton Papers Inc. (“API”) has also moved for summary judgment on the CERCLA countercla

OPINION Justice McCAFFERY. The issue presented in this case is whether a parent has legal standing to challenge the appointment of a guardian for her child’s estate. We hold that a parent does have standing, and so we reverse. Kelsey Lauren Miller was born on June 26, 1998, the sole child of the marriage of Appellant, Kristi L. George (hereinafter “Mother”), and Wesley D. Miller

Affirmed in part and reversed in part by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge KING joined. OPINION DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge. Daniel Anthony Miller, an African-American male, brings this civil rights action against Prince George’s County, Ma

GRIFFIS, P. J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Tarvarcus Miller appeals his conviction of sale of a controlled substance. In *201the brief filed by the Office of State Public Defender, Indigent Appeals Division, Miller claims that it was error to allow the testimony of a technical reviewer of the drug-analysis report. Miller also filed a pro se supplemental brie

949 F.Supp. 961 (1997) Joseph R. MILLER and Maria J. Goncalves, Plaintiffs, v. GEORGE ARPIN & SONS, INC. and United States of America, General Services Administration, Defendants. C.A. No. 95-304L. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. January 7, 1997. *962 *963 Richard G. Galli,

812 F.Supp.2d 83 (2011) Gary J. BACHORZ and Carmelo A. Scuderi, Plaintiffs v. Shauna MILLER-FORSLUND, Executrix of the Estate of Nairn L. Miller, Defendant. C.A. No. 09-cv-30132-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 22, 2011. *84 Mark J. Albano, Dalsey, Ferrara & Albano, Springfield, MA, for Plaintiff

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF AND TO AMEND AND CORRECT THE MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF THE COURT REGARDING PURCHASE PRICE OF THE PROPERTY (Dkt. No. 50) PONSOR, District Judge. On September 22, 2011, 812 F.Supp.2d 83 (D.Mass.2011), the court awarded Plaintiffs specific performance of an option to purchase a commercial property they leased

*181 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MILLER, Judge. Before this court is defendant’s motion to dismiss the consolidated actions of plaintiffs The George Family Trust (the “George Trust”) and The Elizabeth Stone Trust (the “Stone Trust”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1). The two plaintiff trusts and the individu

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered August 15, 2003. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiffs motion to disqualify defendant’s law firm and denied those parts of plaintiffs motion seeking to recuse the court and for leave to reargue and renew. It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue be and the same hereby is unanimously

*********** The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before Chief Deputy Commissioner Gheen and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Awa

*1082Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered January 13, 2003. The order denied plaintiffs motion for the continued admission of Mark Hannabury as an attorney pro hac vice. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the motion is granted.