Cases

Opinion issued December 17, 2009 In The Court of Appeals For The

75 So.3d 471 (2011) OHM LOUNGE, L.L.C. v. ROYAL ST. CHARLES HOTEL, L.L.C., Warren L. Reuther, Jr., Eddie L. Jacobs, Sr., James E. Smith and Latter & Blum, Inc. No. 2010-CA-1303. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. September 21, 2011. *472 Timothy S. Madden, Monica J. Manzella, John A. Cangelosi, King Krebs & Jur

Acting Justice TOAL. The underlying dispute in this case involves the repair of faulty windows and sliding glass doors in a condominium development, Shipyard Village Horizontal Property Regime (Shipyard Village), in Pawleys Island, South Carolina. Fifty co-owners of units in Buildings C & D of the development (Petitioners) appeal the court of appeals’ decision reversing the

KONDUROS, J. The Shipyard Village Council of Co-Owners, Inc. (the Council) appeals the circuit court’s grant of partial summary judgment to owners of condominiums within the development in the case involving faulty windows and sliding doors. The Council argues it did not have a duty to investigate, the business judgment rule should have applied, and a jury could have found it did not breach any duty. We affirm in part, reverse

881 F.Supp. 580 (1995) Mary BRADDOCK, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Braddock, deceased, and Mary Braddock, individually, Plaintiff, v. ORLANDO REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, INC., Jeffrey Backer, M.D., and Son L. Chau, M.D., Defendants. No. 94-1052-Civ-ORL-18. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. April 4, 1995.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. GERALD GLENN BOSWELL No. COA09-14 Court of Appeals of North Carolina Filed July 7, 2009 This case not for publication Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Special Deputy Attorney General Elizabeth N. Strickland, for the State. Geoffrey W. Hosford, for defendant-appellant. MARTIN, Chief Judge. Gerald Glenn Boswell ("d

Filed 9/23/16; pub. order 10/18/16 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE MANUEL NAVA, Plaintiff and Appellant, G052218 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2014-00706007) SADDLEBACK MEMORIAL MEDICAL OPINION CENTER et

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT KNOXVILLE FILED _______________________________________________ CAROLYN BRUCE and husband, March 4, 1996 JOHN DAVID BRUCE, Cecil Crowson, Jr. Plaintiffs-Appellants, Appellate C ourt Clerk Vs.

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT GEISER, Senior Judge: A general court-martial with officer members convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of housebreaking and two specifications of service discrediting conduct by invading the privacy of another, in violation of Articles 130 and 134, Uniform Code of Mili*546tary Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 930 and

(2008) Bonita Clark MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. Lee GILMAN, et al., Defendants. Nos. 03-145, 04-103. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. April 24, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW [DE 316/156], DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL [DE 319/159]; AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO S

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Mitzi Elaine Dailey, AG No. 6, September Term, 2020. Opinion by Getty, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTION – DISBARMENT Respondent, Mitzi Elaine Dailey, violated several provisions of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“MARPC”) and the Maryland Rules when she failed to maintain an attorney trust account, failed to act on her client’s case, failed to communicate with her client, abandoned representation of her client, misappropriate

142 F.Supp.2d 927 (2001) David E. GROOMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Colonel Kenneth B. MARSHALL, et al., Defendants. No. 99CV671. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 20, 2001. *928 *929 Oasis Corp., William Darrell Lunsford, Geoffrey Parker Damon, Damon Law Office, Ci

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 06a0047p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X -

ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) from Magistrate Judge Tomlinson, recommending th'at the Court grant the defendants’ separate motions to dismiss pro se plaintiffs claims, except with respect to the claims against U.S. Secret Service Agent Joseph Gerbino (“Agent Gerbino”) in his individual capacity. For the reasons set forth below,

15‐1018 Williams v. Annucci 1 2 In the 3 United States Court of Appeals 4 For the Second Circuit 5 ________ 6 7 AUGUST TERM, 2017 8 9 ARGUED: OCTOBER 11, 2017 10 DECIDED: JULY 10, 2018 11

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal by the Golden Hill Pau-gussett Tribe of Indians from judgments of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Dorsey, J.) entered July 22, 1993, August 31, 1993, and September 3, 1993, dismissing without prejudice each of its three claims under the Nonintercourse Act, 25 U.S.C. § 177. See Golden Hill Paugus-sett Tribe of Indians v. Weicker, 839 F.Supp.

396 F.Supp. 1010 (1975) Martha Ellen REICHARDT, Individually and on behalf of all other women similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Gleeson L. PAYNE, Individually and as Insurance Commissioner of the State of California, et al., Defendants. No. C-74-1179 WHO. United States District Court, N. D. California. April 30, 1975. *1011

PIERCE, Circuit Judge: Steven B. Zackson appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York after a jury trial before Eugene H. Nickerson, Judge. Zackson was convicted of conspiring to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and cocaine, each in violation of

Supplemental Opinion Regarding Plan Conñrmation, Approving Settlements, and Approving Exit Financing STEVEN W. RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction.159 II. The Plan CONFIRMATION Prooess. i — 1 ZD i — I A. The City’s Plans of Adjustment. i — 1 <

439 F.3d 280 Bonita CLARK-MURPHY, as Personal Rep. of the Estate of Jeffrey Clark, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Brian FOREBACK and Kristine Wakefield, Defendants-Appellants,Lee Gilman, Ginger Bayne, Bruce Stout, Anthony Vandervlucht, Joann Friedt, Don Wise, Shirley Whittaker, Rina Becher, Tom Lauters, Andy Dyer, Mike Harvey, Mark Fox, and Thomas Dowker, Defendants-Appellants. No. 05-1323.