Cases

Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge DAVIS wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge THACKER joined. Judge THACKER wrote a separate concurring opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote an opinion dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment. DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge: Appellants Aaron Graham and Erie Jordan appeal their convictions for several offenses arising from a series of armed robberies. Specifically,

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 12-2548 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. HARRY KATZIN; MICHAEL KATZIN; MARK LOUIS KATZIN, SR. ______________ APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT STACIE WEISMAN, an individual and MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT, SOLUTIONS AND STRATEGIES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Appellants, v. SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF AMERICA, INC., d/b/a SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF FLORIDA, a Florida for profit corporation, JOHN WITTIG, an individual

*739OPINION HORN, Judge. BACKGROUND Congress has established a special retirement system for federal law enforcement officers (LEOs), granting Law Enforcement Officers entitlement to an annuity at a younger age and with fewer years of service than other federal employees. 5 U.S.C. § 8336(c)(1) (2000). In addition to the special reti

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOHN ANTHONY BERTSCH and JEFFERY LEE HRONIS, Defendants and Appellants. S093944 Sacramento County Superior Court 94F07295 April 20, 2026 Chief Justice Guerrero authored the opinion of the Court, in which Justices Corri

PER CURIAM: Defendant-appellant Scyrus Dion Hebert was convicted in the Eastern District of Texas on four counts of bank robbery, eleven counts of use of a firearm during the course of a violent crime, and seven counts of interference with commerce by committing robbery, in violation of the Hobbs Act.1 Hebert appeals his convictions on the following grounds: (1) the Hobbs Act

43 F.3d 707 148 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2266, 310 U.S.App.D.C. 56 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,v.Clayton Eugene DeFRIES, a/k/a Gene; Clyde E. Dodson;Reinhold Schamann, a/k/a Fred; Claude W. Daulley;Alexander C. Cullison, a/k/a Doc; Karl M. Landgrebe;Donald K. Masingo; Michael A. Ribera; George Butler, Jr.;William M. Fast; Walter J. Browne; Thaddeus Kedzierski,a/k/a Ted; Durwin W. Davis;

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS. STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. The defendants in this ease are union officials indicted for crimes relating to their manipulation of union elections and misuse of union offices. Counts three and four of the *708indictment charged them with mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 for t

ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

555 F.Supp. 641 (1982) FISHER FOODS, INC., Plaintiff, v. The OHIO DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL and The Ohio Liquor Control Commission, Defendants. No. C80-2381. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D. December 28, 1982. *642 *643 Walter Bates, Arter & Hadden, Thomas Chema, Anthony Da

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge, Dissenting: This is a case of first impression. The panel is unanimous in agreeing that this appeal requires us to interpret critical language in the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act (FTAIA or “Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 6a (1994). We must express a judicial interpretation to a single word, “direct,” in the FTAIA’s provision of “direct, substantial, and reasonably foreseeable effect” o

ACCEPTED 01-15-00571-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/24/2015 9:45:33 PM CHRIST

508 F.2d 462 75-1 USTC P 9108 Irving J. HAYUTIN and Sima B. Hayutin, Petitioners-Appellants,v.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee (threecases).**Hayutin (three cases), 73-1757, 1765, 1767, 1768; Estate ofShaw (four cases), 73-1758, 1762, 1770, 1772; NorthwestWater Corp. (three cases), 73-1759, 1763, 1771; S and HBuilders, Inc. (three cases), 73-1760, 1761, 1773;& Harr

629 F.2d 325 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.David Coleman DOVE and Robert B. Johnston, Jr., Appellants.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Jackie H. MORROW, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Jerry Lee MORROW, Appellant. Nos. 79-5297 to 79-5299. United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. Argued April 9, 1980.Deci

JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Jr., Circuit Judge: David Coleman Dove appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2315 for the receipt of stolen goods moving in interstate commerce; Robert B. Johnston, Jr. appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2314 for the transportation of stolen goods in interstate commerce; and Jackie H. Morrow appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2312 for the transportation in interstate commerce of a stolen

ACCEPTED 05-15-00495-CV 05-15-00495-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 4/17/2015 8:35:00 AM LISA MATZ

752 F.Supp. 764 (1990) 1ST OF AMERICA BANK, MID-MICHIGAN, N.A., Successor Conservator of the Estate of Michaela King, a minor; Lucinda E. King, individually; and Robert W. King, individually, Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 87-CV-74774-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D. December 6, 1990. As Amended December 10, 199

KIRSCH, Judge. [1] Indiana’s Alcoholic Beverages Law, which consists of several statutory provisions (“the Prohibited Interest Provisions”), prohibits alcohol wholesalers from holding interests in both beer and liquor permits. Monarch Beverage Company, Inc. (“Monarch”) filed a complaint against David Cook, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Indiana Alcohol and Tobacco C

JENSEN, District Judge: In this action alleging federal antitrust and racketeering law violations and pendent state law tort claims, the individual plaintiffs 1 appeal the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants 2 (collectively referred to as “Burke

ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3