⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “Gatewood v. Universal Underwriters Service Corporation”

District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2010-02-04 · Published · cited 10× · 682 F. Supp. 2d 197; 2010 WL 431419
682 F.Supp.2d 197 (2010) Carol A. WOLF, Plaintiff, v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. CA 08-436S. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. February 4, 2010. John B. Reilly, John Reilly & Associates, Providence, RI, for Plaintiff. Jeffrey P. Finan, Finan & Grourke, Pawtucket, RI, for Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER WI
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011-04-26 · Published · cited 3× · 784 F. Supp. 2d 585; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45105
784 F.Supp.2d 585 (2011) SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., Plaintiff, v. AIG UNITED GUARANTY CORP. a/k/a United Guaranty Corp., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:09cv529. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. April 26, 2011. *587 S. Miles Dumville, Alison Ross Wickizer Toepp, Curtis Gilbert Manchester, Travi
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2012-03-19 · Published · cited 27× · 867 F. Supp. 2d 1143; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56581; 2012 WL 1132374
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Memorandum Motion to Remand to State Court for Lack of Federal Jurisdiction, filed June 24, 2011 (Doc. 55)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on March 7, 2012. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act,
Michigan Supreme Court · 2005-07-28 · Published · cited 752× · 703 N.W.2d 23; 473 Mich. 457
703 N.W.2d 23 (2005) 473 Mich. 457 Shirley RORY and Ethel Woods, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a/k/a CNA Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 126747. COA No. 5. Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued March 8, 2005. Decided July 28, 2005. *26 Hakim & T
District Court, D. Kansas · 2002-08-07 · Published · cited 10× · 212 F. Supp. 2d 1264; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14715; 2002 WL 1808095
212 F.Supp.2d 1264 (2002) James KASTER, Plaintiff, v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant. Case No. 01-2190-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. August 7, 2002. *1265 Sarah A. Brown, Parkinson, Foth, Orrick & Brown, LLP, Lenexa, KS, for Plaintiff. Jennifer P. Kyner, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, Kansas Ci
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 566 S.W.3d 410
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
District Court, S.D. Texas · 1998-09-24 · Published · cited 7× · 23 F. Supp. 2d 704; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15162
23 F.Supp.2d 704 (1998) Raja N. SALAMEH, M.D., Plaintiff, v. PROVIDENT LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. H-96-2874. United States District Court, S.D. Texas. September 24, 1998. *705 *706 *707 *
Calm v. Taylorpublic domain
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2026-07-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WAUNYE CALM, BRANDON GATEWOOD, ISAIAH HARBER, JYAIRE HENRY, DEWITT JOHNSON, ZAKEE LLOYD, DENNIS WILLIAMS, and DEVON YOUNG, Plaintiffs, v. C.A. No. 2026-0576-JTL TERRA TAYLOR, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Delaware Department of Correction, Defendant. OPINION ADDRESSING THRESHOLD ISSUES Date Submitted: June
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958-03-10 · Published · cited 31× · 251 F.2d 499
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. In this declaratory judgment action by the Insurer with a successful counterclaim by the Assured for damage equivalent to the commuted value of weekly, total disability sickness benefits, the questions for us are: (1) whether the policy was voided by fraudulent misrepresentations of the medical history by