Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

MARCIA G. COOKE, United States District Judge In 1990, Congress passed the Americans with Disability Act to protect people with disabilities from discrimination in places of public accommodation. Since then, a bevy of administrative orders and court decisions have helped businesses understand how to apply the ADA to their brick-and-mortar stores. But as more and more people take their shopping online, regulations have fallen further

420 F.Supp.2d 1312 (2006) Damaris RIVERA and Ana Daniel, on their own behalf and on behalf of all those similarly situated. Plaintiffs. v. AT & T CORP., Defendant. No. 05-60970. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. February 23, 2006. *1313 *1314 Kevin James Kulik, Fort Lauderdale, F

191 B.R. 238 (1995) In re BICOASTAL CORPORATION d/b/a Simuflite f/k/a The Singer Company, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 89-8191-8P1. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. December 19, 1995. *239 Harley E. Riedel, Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Prosser, Tampa, FL, David Potter, Oppenheimer, Wolff & Donnelly, St. Paul,

447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter

ACCEPTED 03-14-00718-CV 4288348 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di

OPINION 1 PER CURIAM: We are asked to delineate the statutory and constitutional limits to the President’s power to control immigration in this appeal of the district court’s order preliminarily enjoining two sections of Executive Order 13780 (“E02” or “the Order”), “Protecting the Nation From Fore

444 B.R. 613 (2011) In re TOUSA, INC., et al., Debtors. 3V Capital Master Fund Ltd., et al., Appellants, v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Tousa, Inc., et al., Appellees. Nos. 10-60017-CIV/GOLD, 10-61478, 10-62032, 10-62035, 10-62037. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. February 11, 2011. *618 Nancy A. C

988 A.2d 229 (2010) 294 Conn. 817 NEW ENGLAND ESTATES, LLC v. TOWN OF BRANFORD et al. No. 18132. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued May 26, 2009. Decided February 16, 2010. *234 Wesley W. Horton, Hartford and William H. Clendenen, Jr., New Haven, with whom, were Kimberly A. Knox, Hartfor

820 F.Supp.2d 1305 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. 1. ALL FUNDS IN THE ACCOUNT OF PROPERTY FUTURES, INC., Account No. 213478, at Colonial Bank, and 2. The Real Properties Located at 2801 Gateway Drive, Pompano Beach, FL, 32100 U.S. Highway 19 North, Palm Harbor, FL, 3040 Industry Drive, East Hempfield, PA, and 111 Windsor Drive, Oak Brook, IL, and All Lease Payment Monies Being Held in Escrow by the United States Marshals Service f

A. Jay Cristol, Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court THIS MATTER came before the Court at a hearing on September 11, 2018 ("Hearing") upon the Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Pending Adversary Proceeding ("Motion") [ECF No. 10] filed by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP ("Cadwalader") and the Response to the Motion ("Response") [ECF No. 22] filed by Plaintiff, Maria Y

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MATSUMOTO, United States District Judge: Coconut Grove Pads, Inc. (“CGP”) commenced this action principally seeking a declaratory judgment that U.S. Reissue Patent No. 43,766 (the “ ’766 Patent” or the “patent-in-suit”) is invalid and not infringed by CGP. The patent-in-suit is for a bra strap retainer, and CGP named as defendants the owner of the ’766 Patent, Mich & Mich TGR In

BLACK, Circuit Judge: Craig Piazza appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of his Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition for bad faith under 11 U.S.C. § 707(a). Piazza contends the bankruptcy court erred because § 707(a) permits dismissal only “for cause” and prepetition bad faith does not constitute “cause” for dismissal. In the alternative, Piazza

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-436L (Filed: July 15, 2022) ************************** * LEMON BAY COVE, LLC, * Fifth Amendment Taking; Army Corps of * Engineers’ Denial of Permit to Bulkhead Plaintiff, * and Fill; Categorical

OPINION DENYING CLASS CERTIFICATION JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. At issue is whether class certification is appropriate where a group of plaintiffs— participants in an ERISA plan and holders of individual shares of the stock of a closely-held corporation — allege a fraudulent scheme on the part of a corporation’s board members to conceal the value of the participants’ shares and to benefit

650 F.Supp.2d 1213 (2009) SIERRA EQUITY GROUP, INC., as assignee of Michael E. Splain, James W. Lees, and the Andrew Revocable Trust, Plaintiff, v. WHITE OAK EQUITY PARTNERS, LLC, Ross Statham, individually, Philip Orlando, individually, and Anthony Orlando, individually, Defendants. No. 08-80017-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. March 30, 2009.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On December 10, 2010, plaintiffs David J. Keegan, Luis Garcia, Betty Kolstad, Carol Hinkle, Eric Ellis, Charles Wright, and Jonathan Zdeb filed this putative class action against American Honda Motor Co., Inc., and Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc., alleging claims under the Califor

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1351 INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself; HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients; MIDDLE EAST STUDIES ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., on behalf of itself and its members; MUHAMMED METEAB; PAUL HARRIS

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1351 INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients; HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients; MIDDLE EAST STUDIES ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., on behalf of itself and its members; MUHAMMED MET