Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gary Zhu”
Zhu v. Mukaseypublic domain
*11 SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Fei Zhu, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a May 31, 2007 order of the BIA affirming the October 4, 2005 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Noel Anne Ferris, denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Fei Zhu, No. A9
Zhu v. Gonzalespublic domain
493 F.3d 588 (2007) Yuqing ZHU, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent. No. 05-60891. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 23, 2007. *589 *590 Brian K. Bates (argued), Reina Bates Imm. Law Group, Houston, TX, for Zhu. Gary Layton Anderson (argu
Zhu Jiao Jiang v. Holderpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Zhu Jiao Jiang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a November 13, 2007 order of the BIA, which denied her motion to reopen. In re Zhu Jiao Jiang, No. A77 817 739 (B.I.A. Nov. 13, 2007). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for a
Zhu Jiao Jiang v. Holderpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Zhu Jiao Jiang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a November 13, 2007 order of the BIA, which denied her motion to reopen. In re Zhu Jiao Jiang, No. A77 817 739 (B.I.A. Nov. 13, 2007). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for a
Zhu Qiong Chen v. Holderpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Zhu Qiong Chen, and her husband Hui Chen, natives and citizens of the People’s Republic of China, seek review of an April 3, 2008 order of the BIA, affirming the February 21, 2007 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Noel Ferris, which denied their applications for asylum and withholding of removal. In re Zhu Qiong Chen, Hui Chen, Nos. A097 980 410, A096 190 100 (B.I.A. Apr. 3, 2008), aff'g Nos
Sai Ying Zhu v. Holderpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Sai Ying Zhu, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a July 14, 2008 order of the BIA, affirming the February 2, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Douglas B. Schoppert, which denied her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Sai Ying Zhu, No. A095 709 786 (B.I.A. July 14, 2008), aff'g <
Zhu Yan Huang v. Gonzalespublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Zhu Yan Huang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a July 21, 2005 order of the BIA affirming the June 17, 2004 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Barbara A. Nelson denying petitioner’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Zhu Yan Huang, No. A 73 659 590 (B.I.A. July 21, 2005), af
Meihua Zhu v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** *817Meihua Zhu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C.
Sai Ying Zhu v. Holderpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Sai Ying Zhu, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a July 14, 2008 order of the BIA, affirming the February 2, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Douglas B. Schoppert, which denied her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Sai Ying Zhu, No. A095 709 786 (B.I.A. July 14, 2008), aff'g <
Zhu Qiong Chen v. Holderpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Zhu Qiong Chen, and her husband Hui Chen, natives and citizens of the People’s Republic of China, seek review of an April 3, 2008 order of the BIA, affirming the February 21, 2007 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Noel Ferris, which denied their applications for asylum and withholding of removal. In re Zhu Qiong Chen, Hui Chen, Nos. A097 980 410, A096 190 100 (B.I.A. Apr. 3, 2008), aff'g Nos
Xiu Mei Zhu v. Holderpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Xiu Mei Zhu, a native and citizen of China, seeks review of a March 10, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the May 26, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Annette S. Elstein denying Zhu’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Xiu *444Mei Zhu, No. A
Yue Zhu Yang v. Gonzalespublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED. Yue Zhu Yang, through counsel, petitions for review of the BIA’s denial of her motion to reopen her removal proceedings. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history.
Xiu Mei Zhu v. Holderpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Xiu Mei Zhu, a native and citizen of China, seeks review of a March 10, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the May 26, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Annette S. Elstein denying Zhu’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Xiu *444Mei Zhu, No. A
Zhu Xian Wang v. United States Department of Justicepublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Zhu Xian Wang, pro se, petitions for review of the orders of the BIA: (1) affirming an immigration judge’s denial of her asylum, withholding of deportation, and voluntary departure claims; (2) denying her motion to reopen; and (3) denying her motion for reconsideration. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of the case. This Court dismisses Wang’s petition for rev
Ming Xia Zhu v. Board of Immigration Appealspublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Ming Xia Zhu, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a March 25, 2004 order of the BIA affirming, in part, the May 22, 2002 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Robert D. Weisel denying Zhu’s applications for asylum and withholding of removal. In re Ming-Xia Zhu a.k.a. Xiao-Xia Yang, No. A 77 977 944 (B.I.A. March 25, 2004), aff'g No. A 77 977 944 (Im
Hong Zhu v. Board of Immigration Appealspublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Hong Zhu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of a June 28, 2004 order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), affirming Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Opaciuch’s denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts of this case, its procedural posture, and the decision below.
Fu Min Zhu v. Board of Immigration Appealspublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND *180DECREED, that the petition for review be DENIED. Fu Min Zhu, a native and citizen of China, petitions this Court for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). The BIA denied Zhu’s motion for reconsideration of its decision dismissing as untimely his appeal of
Pamela Demars v. Gary Buntenbachpublic domain
Patricia L. Cohen, Judge . Introduction Pamela Demars (Wife) appeals the judgment of contempt of the Circuit Court of' St. Charles County ordering her to transfer 960 shares of stock to Gary 'Bunten-bach (Husband). We affirm. Factual and Procedural Background Husband and Wife mar
Heng Wang Zhu v. United States Attorney Generalpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of the petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED. Petitioner Heng Wang (“Zhu”) petitions, through counsel, for review of the BIA’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) relief. We assume the parti
Tian Rong Zhao v. Holderpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioners Tian Rong Zhao and Xiu Zhu Chen, natives and citizens of the People’s Republic of China, seek review of two November 2, 2007 orders of the BIA denying their motions to reopen. In re Tian Rong Zhao, No. A74 284 596 (B.I.A. Nov. 2, 2007); In re Xiu Zhu Chen, No. A97 977 681 (B.I.A. Nov. 2, 2007). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in th