Cases

Cite as 2019 Ark. App. 454 Digitally signed by Elizabeth ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS Perry Date: 2022.08.03 13:59:08 DIVISION IV -05'00' No. CR-19-240 Adobe Acrobat version: 2022.001.20169 Opinion Delivered October 16, 2019 GARY WEBSTER APPELLANT APPEA

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-437-CR GARY WEBSTER APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-437-CR GARY WEBSTER APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM THE 362ND DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

17 So.3d 602 (2009) Paul J. WEBSTER, Appellant v. Rebecca J. WEBSTER, Appellee. No. 2008-CA-00518-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. August 25, 2009. *603 G. Charles Bordis IV, attorney for appellant. Gary L. Robert, attorney for appellee. Before KING, C.J., BARNES and ISHEE, JJ. ISHEE, J., for the Court.<

GREENE, District Judge. Appellant Carol Ann Culver appeals from the district court’s order granting appel-lees’ Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing her Section 1983 claim of use of excessive force while she was in a jail cell in a post-arrest pre-trial detention setting. FACTUAL BACKGROUND On July 9, 1987, following report

201 S.W.3d 104 (2006) Dennis SEIDNER, Appointing Authority, Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Youth Services, Appellant, v. Gary WEBSTER, Respondent. No. WD 65375. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. September 19, 2006. *105 Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Sarah E. Ledgerwood, Assistant Attorney Ge

OPINION BAKER, Judge. Appellant-plaintiff Jacquelyn Webster Green appeals the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss in favor of appellees-defendants the Housing Authority of the City of Gary Indiana (GHA) et al. More particularly, Webster Green contends that the trial court erred when it determined that the GHA had no duty to conduct “well-being” ch

5 So.3d 713 (2009) Tony L. GARY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. No. 1D08-5383. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. February 12, 2009. Rehearing Denied April 2, 2009. *714 Tony L. Gary, pro se, Petitioner. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Natalie D. Kirk, Assistant Attorne

*594OPINION1 Mary F. Walrath, United States Bankruptcy Judge Before the Court is the Objection of the SWE & C Liquidating Trustee (the “Trustee”) to claims filed by Travelers Indemnity Company and its affiliates, including Travelers Casualty and Surety Company (“Travelers”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court w

328 S.W.3d 434 (2010) WEBSTER COUNTY ABSTRACT CO., INC., D.D. Hamilton Co., and Missouri Land Title Association, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Stacy ATKISON, Recorder of Deeds of Webster County, and Recorders Association of Missouri, Defendants/Respondents, and Webster County, Missouri, by and through its duly elected Commission solely in their capacity as such, Paul Ipock, Presiding Commissioner, Billie Cunningham, Northern Commissioner, and Den

MEMORANDUM ** In his petition for review to the California Supreme Court, Webster argued that *704his 25-years-to-life sentence is a cruel or unusual punishment under the California Constitution. He didn’t assert, however, that his sentence violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. Nor did he cite or discuss any fe

On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 39A05-1404-CR-156 Following a physical altercation with another man, Gary Allen Gibson was charged with one count of aggravated battery, two counts of criminal confinement by removal, and one count of battery resulting in serious bodily injury. A jury acquitted Gibson on one of the confinement counts, but convicted him on the ot

41 So.3d 395 (2010) CHARLOTTE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS and Employers Mutual, Inc., Appellants, v. Karyn E. GARY, Appellee. No. 1D09-5914. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. July 30, 2010. Marjorie Gadarian Graham of Marjorie Gadarian Graham, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, and Daniel J. DeMay of Pallo, Marks, Hernandez, Gechijian & DeMay, P.A., Sarasota

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Bruce Webster requests a certificate of appealability (“COA”) for issues the district court, which granted a COA on two issues, deemed unworthy of collateral review. Because Webster has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, we deny his application. I. In 1996, a federal jury convicted Webster of, and sentenced him t

PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. See Mintz v. Broward Correctional Institute, 800 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (holding that an order of a Judge of Compensation Claims which merely grants a motion to dismiss is a nonfinal and nonappealable order). ERVIN, WEBSTER and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

JUSTICE LYTTON delivered the opinion of the court: In this case, Gary Webster and Tammy Cashmer were injured in a motorcycle accident. Each claimed that the other was driving. An action for declaratory judgment was filed to determine the rights and obligations of Webster, Cashmer and their insurance companies. After the trial judge found that Webster was the driver, this appeal wa

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS JOHNSON, District Judge. Standard on Summary Judgment A party moving for summary judgment has the burden of showing that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). Summary judgment is appropriate when a moving party points to an absence of evidence

[Cite as State v. Webster, 2021-Ohio-3218.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 20AP-171 (C.P.C. No. 17CR-4852) v. :

RUDMAN, Justice. [¶ 1] Bath Iron Works [“BIW”] petitions from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board granting Carl Webster’s motion for attorney’s fees. The issue is whether attorney’s fees awarded pursuant to 39 M.R.S.A § 110(2) (1989), repealed by P.L. 1991, ch. 885, § A-7, must be offset by the amount of attorney’s fees awarded pursuant to the federal Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act [“LHWCA”],