Cases

JORDAN, Circuit Judge: Sometimes a number is just a number, 1 but when the number at issue triggers an enhancement under the Sentencing Guidelines, that number matters. In this appeal we decide whether the government presented sufficient evidence that 250 or more persons or entities were victimized by the fraud scheme

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00389-CV IN RE OTHA GARY WASHINGTON RELATOR ------------ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 ----

Bucklo, District Judge. A Wisconsin jury convicted Rodney Washington of multiple counts of first-degree sexual assault with the use of a dangerous weapon and other crimes. Washington appealed his conviction, arguing that the criminal complaint that triggered his prosecution was legally insufficient under Wisconsin law; that his trial attorney was ineffective for failing to seek dismissa

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two

Pennell, J. ¶76 (concurring) I agree with the lead opinion that Gary Farnworth II can be convicted of only one count of first degree theft. However, I disagree with the reasons why this is so.1 I do not interpret Washington’s theft statute as permitting prosecutors common law discretion to divide a continuing offense of first degree theft into multiple charges according to time periods. Such a rule w

Fearing, J. ¶1 Following Gary Stoddard’s convictions for first degree murder and first degree kidnapping, the *224 sentencing court imposed legal financial obligations, including a mandatory deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) collection fee. Stoddard appeals the financial obligations. He argues that the trial

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 69527-4-1 Respondent, v. PUBLISHED OPINION GARY WADE, Appellant. FILED: March 30, 2015 Schindler, J. — A jury convicted Gary Wade of murder in the second degree of Michelle Thornton. Wade seeks reversal, a

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District  GARY TODD WASHINGTON-BEY,   WD81507 Appellant,  OPINION FILED: v.   February 19, 201

Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER Michael J. Talbot, C.J. Gary Steven Garrett v Darita Camille Washington Presiding Judge Docket No. 323705 All Court of Appeals Judges LC No.

JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge: Gary Washington and Jeffrey Shepard appeal from judgments of the District Court for the Eastern District of New York (I. Leo Glasser, Judge) convicting them, after a jury trial, of various offenses in connection with theft of goods from foreign commerce. Though most of the claims asserted on appeal require little or no discussion, we write briefly t

FILED COURT Or APPEALS 1)[ VIISION 11

PER CURIAM. Gary Todd Washington, Sr. ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the circuit court denying his pro se motion to reopen his Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 (2008) motion for post-conviction relief ("Motion to Reopen"), which was denied by the motion court without an evidentiary hearing in 2008. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit

10/30/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 27, 2024 GARY LEE BRAGG, JR. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 117446 Hector Sanchez, Judge ___________________________________

ORDER ON DEBTOR’S OBJECTION TO CLAIM OF THE CITY OF COLUMBIA John E. Waites, US Bankruptcy Judge This matter comes before the Court upon the Objection to Claim of the City of Columbia (“Objection to Claim”) filed by Gary Allen Washington (“Debtor”). A reply to the Objection to Claim was filed by the City of Columbia (“City”), and a hearing was held on the matter. The Court has jurisdiction over this matte

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Fabre v. Marin, 623 So.2d 1182 (Fla.1993); Loureiro v. Pools by Greg, Inc., 698 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Hasburgh v. WJA Realty, 697 So.2d 219 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 705 So.2d 8 *1392(Fla.1997); E.H.P. Corp. v. Cousin, 654 So.2d 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). COBB

FILED MARCH 3, 2026 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, United States District Judge Plaintiffs are minor children who attend, or attended, public schools in Detroit. They have alleged that the conditions of their schools are so poor, and so inadequate, that they have not received even a minimally adequate education. Specifically, they alleged they have been denied access to literacy on account of their races, in violation of their rights under the Due Process and