Cases

ORDER W. HOMER DRAKE, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court is the confirmation of a Chapter 13 Plan (hereinafter the “Plan”), proposed by Gary Thomas King (hereinafter the “Debtor”). The Chapter 13 Trustee (hereinafter the “Trustee”) objects to confirmation on the basis that the Debtor has not included all of his projected disposable income into the Plan. This Court has subject matter jurisdictio

78 So.3d 689 (2012) Melissa KING, Appellant, v. David KING, Appellee. No. 2D10-2564. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. February 1, 2012. Nicholas A. Shannin of Page, Eichenblatt, Bernbaum & Bennett, P.A., Orlando; and Abigail M. Johnston of The Marks Law Firm, P.A., Orlando; and Thomas D. Marks of The Marks Law Firm, Orlando (substituted as c

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Chief Judge Gregory wrote the opinion, in which Judge King and Senior Judge Davis joined. GREGORY, Chief Judge: In March 1988, Corey Lorenzo Woodfolk pleaded guilty in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to attempted murder and a related firearm offense. Several months after his plea, Woodfolk sought relief fro

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. During a welfare check, Officer Aaron King shot and killed Marilyn Denise Ambrose-Boyd. Her son, Skip Rogers, and her husband, Michael Boyd, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , alleging that Officer King had violated her Fourt

2022 WI 59 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP925 COMPLETE TITLE: James Cobb and Judith Cobb, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross- Respondents-Petitioners, v. Gary A. King, Defendant-Respondent-Cross-Appellant.

*1646Appeals from, an order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Mark H. Fandrich, A.J.), entered April 20, 2010. The order denied the motions of defendants for summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motions are granted and the complaint is dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiff

PER CURIAM: Lyndell Thomas, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accord*509ingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thomas v. Winkler, No. CA-04-1003-FL-5 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 13, 2005). We dispens

776 N.E.2d 368 (2002) CITY OF GARY, Indiana, by its Mayor, Scott L. KING, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. SMITH & WESSON CORP., Beretta U.S.A., Corp., Colt's Mfg. Co., Inc., Browning Arms Corp., Glock Corp., Charter Arms Corp., Hi-Point Firearms Corp., Navegar Inc., d/b/a/ Intratec U.S.A., Corp., B.L. Jennings Inc., Bryco Arms Corp., Phoenix Arms Corp., Lorcin Engineering Corp., Sturm, Ruger & Co., Corp., Taurus Firearms Corp., Davis Industries,

808 N.E.2d 146 (2004) Charles HUGHES, Appellant-Petitioner, v. Scott KING, James Meyer, Otha Lyles, et al., Appellees-Respondents. No. 45A05-0402-CV-86. Court of Appeals of Indiana. May 13, 2004. *147 Thomas V. Barnes, Gary, IN, Attorney for Appellant. James B. Meyer, Rebecca L. Wyatt, Meyer & Wyatt, Gary, IN, Attorney

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D19-611 _____________________________ THOMAS KING, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Gary L. Bergosh, Judge. July 3, 2019 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. WOLF, WETHERELL, and M.K.

MEMORANDUM * Dr. Talmadge King and other individually named defendants appeal the district court’s denial of qualified immunity. Because we find that any property right that the plaintiff, Dr. Stephen Embury, might have had in his job was not clearly established, we reverse. Dr. Embury argues that we have no jurisdiction to consider whether he has a property interest in his job for due pr

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is *928OrdbRed and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

MEMORANDUM** John Michael Crim appeals the grant of summary judgment to defendant police officers on various § 1983 claims and the dismissal under Fed. Rule of Civ. Proc. 12(b)(6) of three claims against defendant County Sheriff Pearce. Pearce cross-appeals the denial of his motion to reconsider, the district court’s denial of qualified immunity. We affirm in part and reverse in part. Because the parties a

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs — disabled adult Medicaid recipients- — -seek a preliminary injunction prohibiting Missouri’s Director of Social Services from enforcing a state regulation curtailing the provision of durable medical equipment (“DME”) to most eategorieally-needy Medicaid recipients. See Mo.Code Regs. Ann. tit. 13, § 70-60.010 (2005). Invoking

OPINION KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge. We determine here the breadth of a state’s waiver of Eleventh Amendment immunity when it removes a case from state to federal court. Procedural History Stephen Embury, a physician, sued the Regents of the University of California *563(the “Regents” or the “State”) and several

191 F.Supp.2d 1071 (2001) Stephen EMBURY, M.D., Plaintiff, v. Talmadge E. KING Jr., M.D., et. al., Defendants. No. C 01-01448 CW. United States District Court, N.D. California. December 13, 2001. *1072 *1073 *1074 Andrew Thomas Sinclair, Sinclair Law Office

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA THOMAS KING, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-5597 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed March 3, 2016. An

PER CURIAM. In an earlier opinion, we affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed by Missouri inmates Malik Abdul-Muhammad and Rashid Ash-Sheikh Junaid for failure to exhaust all available administrative remedies as required by a provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Abdul-Muhammad v. Kemp

741 N.E.2d 1168 (2001) Charles HUGHES and Alex Cherry, Appellants (Plaintiffs Below), v. CITY OF GARY, et al., Appellees (Defendants Below). No. 45S00-0011-CV-636. Supreme Court of Indiana. January 12, 2001. *1169 Douglas M. Grimes, Gary, Indiana, Attorney for Appellants. Hamilton L. Carmouche, Gilbert King, Willie Harris,

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D17-929 _____________________________ THOMAS E. KING, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Gary L. Bergosh, Judge. December 18, 2018 WINOKUR, J. Thomas E. King appeals t