Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gary Merrill Richards”
Miles v. Merrill Lynch & Co.public domain
JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal primarily concerns the issue, surprisingly unsettled in this Circuit, as to what standards govern a district judge in adjudicating a motion for class certification under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Comprehended within this broad issue are subsidiary issues such as whether a definitive ruling must be made that each Rule 23 requirement has been met or whether only so
OPINION ON REHEARING JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice The heirs, devisees, and assigns of Robert Lindsay and June C. Harris 1 (Appellants) filed a motion for rehearing. We grant the motion, withdraw our December 30, 2016 opinion and judgment, and substitute the following opinion and a co
Merrill v. Carpenterpublic domain
867 S.W.2d 65 (1993) Nancy MERRILL d/b/a Merrill Bail Bonds, Francisco Pizana, Herman Herdon, John W. Gilmore, B.W. Hightower d/b/a Buddy Hightower Bail Bond Service, Bob Jones, L. Kirk Ragsdale, Richard Scott, Andy Garza d/b/a Andy Garza's Bail Bond Service, Gary Robbins, Lynn Robbins, Charles McCaslin, Eldon Williams, Dell Robbins, Jerry Trimble d/b/a Jerry's Bail Bond Service, Dan Wagnon d/b/a Lone Star Bail Bonds, Anita Wells d/b/a DFW Bail Bonds, Or
Merrill v. Crothall-American, Inc.public domain
606 A.2d 96 (1992) Richard L. MERRILL, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. CROTHALL-AMERICAN, INC., a Delaware corporation, and United Health Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants Below, Appellees. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: March 3, 1992. Decided: April 21, 1992. Gary W. Aber (argued), and Donald L. Gouge, Jr., Heiman, Aber & Goldlust, Wilmin
131 F.3d 580w Richard C. BECHERER, et al., individually and on behalf ofall others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,J. Don Adams; Kay A. Arceneaux, as Executrix for the DonaldJ. Arceneaux, Sr. Estate; Edward R. Bassine; Anne T.Bassine; Thomas H. Blundell; Jan L. Blundell; James A.Campbell; Darrell R. Caudill; William A. Cherry;Catherine Crebbs, as General Partner of CCT & Co. asadministratrix of Estate of Rober
Gary Thurman v. United States Postal Servicepublic domain
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2022 MSPB 21 Docket No. AT-0752-17-0162-I-1 Gary L. Thurman, Appellant, v. United States Postal Service, Agency.
MOORE, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment. Having certified a plaintiff class only as to certain claims, the district court proceeded to enter judgment in favor of the defendants on a variety of other claims raised in this Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) class action (the “Becherer action”). Subsequently, the district court determined that a number of absent class members (the “Florida plaint
June 25, 2010 Mr. Charles A. Gall Hunton & Williams LLP 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 3700 Dallas, TX 75202-2799 Mr. William Richard Thompson II Hankinson Levinger LLP 750 N. St. Paul Street, Suite 1800 Dallas, TX 75201 Mr. Lewis T. LeClair McKool Smith, P.C. 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, TX 75201 Honorable Bruce Priddy 116th District Court George L. Allen, Sr. Courts Bldg. 600 Commerce St., Ste. 620A Dallas, TX 75202 RE: Case Number: 09-0161 Court of Appeals Number: 05-09-00
Paige Martin v. Gary Yasudapublic domain
OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Defendants Gary Yasuda and Amarillo College of Hairdressing appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. The district court found that the defendants waived their right to arbi *1120 tration by their litigati
City of Gary Ex Rel. King v. Smith & Wesson Corp.public domain
776 N.E.2d 368 (2002) CITY OF GARY, Indiana, by its Mayor, Scott L. KING, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. SMITH & WESSON CORP., Beretta U.S.A., Corp., Colt's Mfg. Co., Inc., Browning Arms Corp., Glock Corp., Charter Arms Corp., Hi-Point Firearms Corp., Navegar Inc., d/b/a/ Intratec U.S.A., Corp., B.L. Jennings Inc., Bryco Arms Corp., Phoenix Arms Corp., Lorcin Engineering Corp., Sturm, Ruger & Co., Corp., Taurus Firearms Corp., Davis Industries,
193 F.3d 415 (6th Cir. 1999) RICHARD C. BECHERER, ET AL., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,J. DON ADAMS; KAY A. ARCENEAUX, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE DONALD J. ARCENEAUX, SR. ESTATE; EDWARD R. BASSINE; ANNE T. BASSINE; THOMAS H. BLUNDELL; JAN L. BLUNDELL; JAMES A.CAMPBELL; DARRELL R. CAUDILL; WILLIAM A. CHERRY; CATHERINE CREBBS, AS GENERAL PARTNER OF CCT & CO. AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF ESTATE OF ROBERT W. CRE
LASKER, District Judge. Douglas J. Michelson, who appears pro se, is suing a number of individual investors, commodities traders, investment companies, commodities brokers, and two commodity exchanges on various federal and state causes of action for losses he suffered in January 1980 when his metal futures account was liquidated by his broker, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (“Merrill Lynch
United States v. Gary Richard Tigermanpublic domain
456 F.2d 54 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Gary Richard TIGERMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 71-1576. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Oct. 13, 1971.Rehearing Denied Feb. 2, 1972. J. B. Tietz (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant. John M
41 B.R. 985 (1984) In re INDEPENDENT CLEARING HOUSE COMPANY, a Trust, Debtor. In re UNIVERSAL CLEARING HOUSE COMPANY, a Trust, aka National Clearing House Company, a Trust, Debtor. In re ACCOUNTING SERVICES COMPANY, a Trust, Debtor. Robert D. MERRILL, Trustee, v. David ABBOTT, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 81A-02886, 81A-02887 and 81A-03704, Adv. No. 83PA-0986. United States Bankruptc
Merrill v. DeMottpublic domain
*1392OPINION Per Curiam: This case involves a lessor’s attempt to recover damages for lessees’ claimed breach of a contract regarding a five-year lease of commercial property in Las Vegas, Nevada. In My 1993, R. Thomas Merrill contracted to purchase commercial real estate located at 2875 Industrial Road, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the sum of $
Gary v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge. This matter is before the Court on defendant’s supplemental motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Plaintiffs Howard V. Gary and M Securities Investment, Inc., d/b/a Howard Gary & Company (“M Securities”), filed a complaint in this court on May 21, 2003, seeking $5 million in damages based upon th
OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. This securities action is a consolidation of four eases involving claims for violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 77k, 77i(a)(2), 77o, in connection with defendants’ sale of mortgage pass-through certificates by means of documents that allegedly contained untrue statements and material
Burton v. Merrillpublic domain
612 A.2d 862 (1992) Norman BURTON v. Lawrence MERRILL. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued November 13, 1991. Decided August 24, 1992. *863 James E. Mitchell (orally), Jim Mitchell and Jed Davis, P.A., Augusta, for plaintiff. Vernon I. Arey (orally), Wheeler & Arey, Waterville, for defendant. Before McKUSICK
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–1942 Filed May 12, 2017 LAURIE FREEMAN, SHARON MOCKMORE, BECCY BOYSEL, GARY D. BOYSEL, LINDA L. GOREHAM, GARY R. GOREHAM, KELCEY BRACKETT, and BOBBIE LYNN WEATHERMAN, Appellees, vs. GRAIN PROCESSING CORPORATION, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Muscatine County, Thomas G. Reidel, Judge. Defendant appeals district court ruling certifyi
Unites States of America v. Gary Lee Aufdenspringpublic domain
439 F.2d 388 UNITES STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Gary Lee AUFDENSPRING, Defendant-Appellant. No. 25811. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 11, 1971. Neil F. Horton (argued), Johnston, Klein & Horton, Oakland, Dal., for appellant. Alan H. Friedman, Asst.