Cases

Cite as 2022 Ark. 49 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-20-590 Opinion Delivered: March 3, 2022 GARY BROWN PETITIONER PRO SE PETITION TO REINVEST V. JURISDICTION IN THE TRIAL COURT TO CONSIDER A PETITION STATE OF ARKANSAS

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any FILED court except for the purpose of establishing Jul 10 2017, 5:47 am the defense of res judicata, collateral CLERK estoppel, or the law of the case. Indiana Supreme Court

03/22/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 13, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RONALD LYONS, JAMES MICHAEL USINGER, LEE HAROLD CROMWELL, AUSTIN GARY COOPER, AND CHRISTOPHER ALAN HAUSER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County Nos. 2017-A-79; 2

Rel: November 22, 2024 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TER

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00149-CR Gary Arthur Pickens, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 119TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. B-01-0298-S, HONORABLE RAE LEIFESTE, JUDGE PRESIDING

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00149-CR Gary Arthur Pickens, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Cite as 2023 Ark. 165 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-23-95 Opinion Delivered: November 16, 2023 RELIANCE HEALTH CARE, INC.; OVATION HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.; APPEAL FROM THE MISSISSIPPI RHC OPERATIONS, INC.; EAGLE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.; GNNC, INC., [NO. 47BCV-19-236] D/B/A GOSNELL THERAPY AND LIVING; SRCNC, INC., D/B/A THE HONORABLE TAN

OPINION BY STRASSBURGER, J.: Gary J. Ogg, Michael A. Murphy, Rebecca Murphy, John D. Perkosky, and Ogg, Murphy, and Perkosky, LLP (OMP) (collectively, Appellants) appeal from the discovery order entered May 20, 2016, which granted in part and denied in part their motion for protective order. 1 Afte

Cite as 2025 Ark. 48 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-24-558 Opinion Delivered: April 24, 2025 MICHAEL W. GATES AND SUSAN J. GATES APPEAL FROM THE GARLAND APPELLANTS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 26CV-21-100] V. HONORABLE GARY M. ARNOLD,

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 26th of September 2016 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

DILLON, Judge. *464 Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court's order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss and entering final judgment dismissing Plaintiffs' claims for (1) breach of contract, (2) impairment of contract under Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution, (3) violat

678 P.2d 1109 (1984) 106 Idaho 336 STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Elizar RUIZ, aka Andy Ruiz, Defendant-Respondent. No. 14511. Supreme Court of Idaho. February 24, 1984. Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., Lynn E. Thomas, Sol. Gen., and Myrna A.I. Stahman, Deputy Atty. Gen., for plaintiff-appellant. Gary Dale DeMeyer and Virginia Rae DeMey

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si

Cite as 2025 Ark. 107 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-24-645 Opinion Delivered: June 5, 2025 TOMMY LAND, IN HIS CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF STATE APPEAL FROM THE GREENE LANDS FOR THE STATE OF COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ARKANSAS [NO. 28CV-22-388] APPELLANT HONORABLE RICHARD LUSBY,

*757MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge. This matter is pending for consideration of Defendant Aliya Rae Adams’s motion to suppress evidence obtained from her residence pursuant to a state search warrant. [Record No. 49] The motion was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Robert E. Wier pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(

612 F.3d 983 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Esteban RUIZ-CHAVEZ, Appellant. No. 09-3397. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: June 18, 2010. Filed: July 16, 2010. *985 Stephanie Rae Amiotte, argued, Sioux Falls, SD, for appellant. John E. Haak, AUSA, argued, Sioux Falls

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

249 P.3d 868 (2011) ZINGIBER INVESTMENT, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAGERMAN HIGHWAY DISTRICT, Defendant-Respondent, and Lynn Babington and Kathy Babington, husband and wife; and Clifton E. Jensen and Suzanne K. Jensen, husband and wife, dba LynClif Farms, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company, Intervenors-Respondents. Nos. 36298, 36840. Supreme Court of Idah

*102Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: McElroy Coal Company seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of living miner benefits to former miner Roger D. Kennedy, pursuant to 3

WILLIAMS, J. Thomas Easterling appeals the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Burger King Corporation and Capital Restaurant Group, LLC (collectively “Burger King”), arguing the court erred in failing to (1) find Burger King breached its duty to take reasonable action to protect him against a foreseeable risk of physical harm; (2) find Burger King had notice of and created an unreasonable and dangerous condi