Cases

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 2, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D22-1534 Lower Tribunal No. 16-21186 ________________ Gary I. Manheimer, Appellant,

KILEY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff in this wrongful death action, based upon diversity jurisdiction, appeals from a judgment upon a verdict directed by the district court at the close of plaintiff’s case. We reverse and remand for trial. Plaintiff’s husband, decedent Kish, died as a result of injuries suffered when the automobile he was driving was struc

254 Cal.App.2d 725 (1967) STEPHEN O. KISH et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-complainants and Appellants, v. BAY COUNTIES TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants; MICHAEL J. SUSSMAN et al., Interveners, Cross-defendants and Appellants. Civ. No. 22639. California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. Three. Sept. 28, 1967. Molinari, Casalnuovo & Berger,

{¶ 1} In July 2005, the Council of the City of Cleveland enacted and the mayor approved Cleveland Codified Ordinances 413.031, which is titled "Use of Automated Cameras to Impose Civil Penalties upon Red Light and Speeding Violators." Cleveland Codified Ordinances 413.031(a) provides: Civil enforcement system established. The City of Cleveland hereby adopts a civil enforcement system for red light and speeding offenders photographed by

PRESENT: All the Justices STEVEN C. GRAY OPINION BY v. Record No. 161419 CHIEF JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS November 2, 2017 FRANCES BINDER, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY Brett A. Kassabian, Judge In this appeal, we consider whether a potential beneficiary under a will ma

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a petition for a writ of prohibition challenging the validity of a municipal ordinance authorizing civil penalties against owners of automobiles that have been photographed by an automated-camera system that detects and photographs cars that run red lights or speed. Because the city does not patently and unambiguously lack jurisdiction to impose these penalties,

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING By an opinion dated November 2, 2007, this Court reversed the trial court's judgment and rendered judgment that appellees take nothing by their claims. Appellees *Page 783 have filed a motion for rehearing contending that the one recovery rule does not preclude this Court from awarding recovery based on breach of the joint venture agreement (JVA). To the extent that appellees are referencin

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 10-757L (Filed: May 18, 2018) ********************** GADSDEN INDUSTRIAL PARK, LLC, Takings Clause; inverse condemnation; Plaintiff, U.S. Const. amend. V; cognizable property v.

13 N.Y.3d 816 (2009) LILY SALM, Appellant, v. MARK S. MOSES, D.D.S., Respondent. Court of Appeals of New York. Argued September 10, 2009. Decided October 22, 2009. *817 Greenwald Law Offices, Chester (Gary Greenwald, Marc Leffler and David A. Brodsky of counsel), for appellant. Mauro Goldberg &

DuBois, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This is a fraud case in which Kilbride Investments Limited, Busystore Limited, and Bergfeld Co. Limited (collectively, "plaintiffs"), allege that defendants, Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc. ("C & W"), Blank Rome LLP ("Blank Rome"), and Cozen O'Conner, P.C. ("Cozen"),1 induced them into investing at least $27 millio

422 N.E.2d 1320 (1981) Joseph F. ANCICH, Arnold T. Bewley, Pete N. Billen, Mike Blaskovich, Mike Cebra, Ray Ferrini, Robert Heli, Keith Keilman, A.W. Keune, Eugene Kish, Norman Kostoff, Joseph Kula, Ted Kunka, Bob Lamski, Joe Lescak, Tony J. Lopiccilo, Ray Macek, Anthony Matuga, C.A. Monestere, Michael J. O'Brien, John Patterson, Norbert Rosinski, Richard Ruthkowski, Donald E. Smith, Robert G. Smith, S.P. Susko, Sr., Eugene Toth, George Fischer, Tony Sla

747 N.W.2d 849 (2008) 480 Mich. 240 PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James COUZENS III, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 135248. Supreme Court of Michigan. April 23, 2008. *850 Gary L. Kohut, Gaylord, for the defendant. Opinion PER CURIAM. At issue in th

354 F.Supp.2d 203 (2005) I.B.E.W. LOCAL NO. 241 PENSION PLAN, and its Trustees, Arnold Dates, David Carr, Bill Emmons, Matthew Labosky, Thomas Stebbins, Jr., and Michael Talarski, by and on behalf of themselves, individually, and the I.B.E.W. Local No. 241 Pension Plan, Plaintiffs, v. FIRST ALLMERICA FINANCIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. and DOES 10, Defendants, First Allmerica Financial Life Insurance Co., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Philip Kis

[Cite as State v. Kennedy, 2023-Ohio-3078.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : No. 22AP-534 Plaintiff-Appellant, : (C.P.C. No. 14CR-514) and v.

¶1 The question in this case is whether a four-wheel all-terrain vehicle (ATV) is a “motor driven cycle.” The trial court answered yes, and so do we. Thus, we affirm. Morgan, J. — ¶2 On August 10, 2001, Adina Lake was a passenger on an ATV that its owner, Shane Bergstrom, was driving on some sand dunes. She was thrown off and injured. ¶3 The ATV was a 1989 Yamaha Banshee. It had four wheel

DATE: 11/13/2018 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:29:24 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 04302018 GROUP 1, REINST FEE ASSESSED _______________________________________________________

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Hastings Mutual Insurance Company, appeals the decision of the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee; David Snowden. The trial court found that Hastings had a duty, to defend David Snowden in Mahoning County Common Pleas case No. 03CV1774, Fares v. Snowden et al. The threshold issue before us is whether an insurance policy that contains an exclusion stating that "Personal Liability

643 F.3d 807 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip E. HILL, Marcus Alcindor, a.k.a. Christopher Alcindor, Robert Powers, Christine Laudermill, David Van Mersbergen, Fred Farmer, David Thomas, Leslie Rector, Barbara Brown, a.k.a. Barbara Eubanks, Defendants-Appellants. No. 07-14602. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. June 14, 2011.

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr

110 P.3d 806 (2005) Adina LAKE, a single person, Appellant v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurer, Respondent. No. 32052-5-II. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2. April 19, 2005. Gailann Y. Stargardter, Barrett & Worden, P.S., Pamela A. Okano, Reed McClure, Seattle, WA, for Respondent. Gary Williams, Attorney at Law,