⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

8 opinions for “Garrick J. Hanks”

Hanks v. Hankspublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1967-04-13 · Published · cited 13× · 199 So. 2d 169; 281 Ala. 92; 1967 Ala. LEXIS 897
The complainant below was born Arthur McLaughlin. His mother and father separated before his birth and she returned to Mobile. Shortly thereafter his mother married a man named Cook and the complainant thereafter was known as Arthur Cook. This second marriage soon terminated and by 1926, when Arthur was six years old, his mother felt that something had to be done in reference to Arthur's rearing because of *Page 94 the unwholesome surroundings in
Krlich v. Clementepublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017-09-29 · Published · cited 1× · 2017 Ohio 7945; 98 N.E.3d 752
TIMOTHY P. CANNON, J. {¶ 1} Appellants, Garrick G. Krlich and Lucinda Krlich, appeal from the July 17, 2015 judgment of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas, granting the motion for summary judgment filed by appellees, Tyler Miller, Lauren Miller, Bruce Miller, and Nick Bruce. For the following reasons, the trial court's judgment is affirmed. {¶ 2} On Septemb
Supreme Court of Florida · 2017-06-15 · Published · cited 0× · 221 So. 3d 1168
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC14-770 ____________ THOMAS BEVEL, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ____________ No. SC14-21
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906-11-12 · Published · cited 0× · 74 N.J.L. 42; 64 A. 1071; 1906 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 17
The opinion of the court was delivered by Fort, J. The defendant in this case is a married woman. On the 19th of March, 1904, she signed an agreement in *43writing agreeing to indemnify the plaintiff, the Irving National Bank, of New York, against loss, to the extent of $35,000, for any loans made to A. J. Ellis & Company which were not paid by Ellis
Allen v. Smithpublic domain
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1831-02-15 · Published · cited 0× · 12 N.J.L. 160
The Chief Justice delivered the opinion of the court. This cause comes before us on a writ of error to the Court of Common Pleas of the county of Essex. The action instituted in that court is upon a bond given to the plaintiff below, Moses Smith, as sheriff of that county, by Daniel K. Allen, one of the defendants and the others as his sureties, with condition that Allen, who had been arrested and was in custod
Supreme Court of the United States · 1934-01-08 · Published · cited 2827× · 291 U.S. 97; 54 S. Ct. 330; 78 L. Ed. 674; 1934 U.S. LEXIS 493; 90 A.L.R. 575
291 U.S. 97 (1934) SNYDER v. MASSACHUSETTS. No. 241. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 7, 1933. Decided January 8, 1934. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, MASSACHUSETTS. *98 Mr. A.C. Webber, with whom Messrs. Henry P. Fielding and L.H. Weinstein