Cases

Dismissed.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-87,725-09 EX PARTE BRYAN GARNER, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. F-2013-1344-E WHC7 IN THE 367TH DISTRICT COURT FROM DENTON COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Applicant was convicted of indecency with a

2025 UT App 80 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS MATTHEW GARNER, Petitioner, v. KADINCE, INC.; JARED HALES; AND AARON VENEZIA, Respondents. Per Curiam Opinion No. 20250188-CA Filed May 22, 2025 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorab

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KEITH A. GARNER, § § Defendant Below, § No. 116, 2025 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 70021420DI (N)

[Cite as State v. Garner, 2024-Ohio-5248.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 1-23-60 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. KHYRESE GARNER, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Allen County Common Pleas Court

[Cite as State v. Garner, 2025-Ohio-2570.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2025-L-075 Plaintiff-Appellee, Civil Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas SHURMALE LAMAR GARNER,

[Cite as State v. Garner, 2023-Ohio-1685.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MIAMI COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellee : C.A. No. 2022-CA-3 : v.

Jose Ortiz Cerrato v. Toni Garner, et al., No. 301, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Albright, J. MARYLAND SECURITY DEPOSIT ACT – DEFINITION OF A SECURITY DEPOSIT – A tenant’s voluntary, advance payment of rent meets the broad definition of a security deposit under the Act, which includes any “payment of money” that protects a landlord against certain categories of risk, such as the risk of non-payment of rent. Advance payment of rent necessarily protects the landlord against that risk. Md. Co

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THERESA GARNER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 24-cv-2381 (JMC) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on Defendant United States of Amer

MEMORANDUM SHELLEY RUCKER, Bankruptcy Judge. This case presents the issue of whether, under 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(5) or (15), the Court can enter an Order finding that certain obligations arising under a divorce decree are non-dischargeable when the amount and nature of those obligations is still in dispute in the state courts. Plaintiff Mitzi Sue Garner (“Plaintiff’), brings this action

JUSTICE HART, dissenting. ¶70 In Neil v. Biggers , the Supreme Court explained that when a procedure used to elicit eyewitness identification of a criminal defendant is "so unnecessarily suggestive and condu[cive] to irreparable mistaken identification that [the defendant] was denied due process of law" that procedure must be screened to ensure the reliability of the identification.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-92,954-01 & WR-92,954-02 EX PARTE CLARENCE BENARD GARNER, Applicant ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 2019-0400-A & 2019-0401-A IN THE 217TH DISTRICT COURT FROM ANGELINA COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Applicant pleaded guilty an

07/29/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 11, 2020 Session MITZI SUE GARNER v. ROBERT ALLEN GARNER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 09D1210 L. Marie Williams, Judge No. E2019-01420-COA-R3-CV This a

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-92,954-01 & WR-92,954-02 EX PARTE CLARENCE BENARD GARNER, Applicant ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 2019-0400-A & 2019-0401-A IN THE 217TH DISTRICT COURT FROM ANGELINA COUNTY Per curiam. ORD

People v Garner (2021 NY Slip Op 05586) People v Garner 2021 NY Slip Op 05586 Decided on October 13, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

J-A13024-23 2023 PA Super 134 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : JACK CLARK GARNER :

Judgment rendered July 2, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 56,052-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA *****

People v Garner (2021 NY Slip Op 04192) People v Garner 2021 NY Slip Op 04192 Decided on July 01, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Colorado denied.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-00962-SCT APRIL QUEN GARNER (JAIME GARCIA) v. JUDI L. GARNER, RONALD CLYDE FOX AND DAVID SMITH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/16/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. PERCY L. LYNCHARD, JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: DESOTO COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: JERRY WESLEY HISAW ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES: