Cases

OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: Defendant FCA U.S. LLC, more commonly known as “Chrysler,” manufactures vehicles that have a key component known as the “Totally Integrated Power Module,” or “TIPM.” The TIPM functions as *216a vehicle’s electronic nerve center, and it is responsible for controlling and distributi

Opinion IKOLA, J. —Narciso Garcia appeals from an order granting defendant Pexco, LLC’s (Pexco) motion to compel arbitration. Garcia opposed the motion on the ground Pexco was not a party to the arbitration agreement. We find Garcia is equitably estopped from denying Pexco’s right to arbitrate and the agency exception applies. We affirm the order of th

EMAS, J. Alderwoods Group, Inc., Osiris Holding of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Graceland Memorial Park South, f/k/a/ Paradise Memorial Gardens, Inc., and Northstar Graceland, LLC (collectively “Alderwoods”), former and current owners and operators of Graceland Memorial Park South Cemetery (the “Cemetery”), appeal the lower court’s non-final order granting class certification. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

(2008) Fred MUIR, Plaintiff, v. CHRYSLER LLC, Defendant. Case No. 3:07 CV 261. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. June 27, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 32), Plain

Chapter 11 DECISION CARLA CRAIG, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge Before the Court is the motion of Defendants to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) the complaint of Chapter 11 debtor and debtor-in-possession Peter J. Garcia (“Peter” or “Plaintiff’).1 Defendants Michael Garcia (“Michael”) and Joaquin Garcia (“Joaquin”) (the “Individual Defendants”) a

JUDGE TERRI F. LOVE This application for supervisory review arises from petitions filed by cab drivers against Uber drivers alleging violations of the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices Act. Following supplementation of the original petition, the Uber drivers filed an exception of no cause of action, which the trial court denied. The Uber drivers sought our supervisory review. This Court denied the writ, and the Uber drivers sought re

(2008) Carmen MOREL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DAIMLER CHRYSLER AG, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 05-2162 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 10, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, District Judge. This is a product liability action concerning a 1987 Mercedes-Benz 200SDL. (Docket No. 108, Defendant's Statement o

Filed 5/27/15 Unmodified opinion attached CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE EDUARDO GARCIA, et al., B257054 Petitioners, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NS026531)

Filed 6/2/15 Second modification for this opinion CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE EDUARDO GARCIA, et al., B257054 Petitioners, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. N

Filed 8/14/20 (opinion on rehearing) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THOMAS JARBOE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A156411 v. HANLEES AUTO GROUP et al., (Alameda County Super. Ct

Filed 5/8/20 Certified for Publication 5/29/20 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THOMAS JARBOE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A156411 v. HANLEES AUTO GROUP et al., (Alameda County Super

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. In its original Complaint (instrument # 1) in the above referenced cause, grounded in Section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a),1 Plaintiff Turner Industries Group, LLC (“TIG”) sought a declaratory judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedu

ORDER COMPELLING ARBITRATION ROGER T. BENITEZ, District Judge. In this proposed class action dispute, Defendant Dell Financial Services, LLC (“DFS”)1 moves to compel arbitration. *1176(Docket No. 13.) For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. BACKGRO

ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

MEMORANDUM OPINION ABDUL K. RALLON, District Judge. This case involves claims under the Americans With Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Alabama Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and the Family and Medical Leave Act. The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 18). On June 14, 2013, the magistrate judge assigned this case entered a Report and Rec

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, STAY IN FAVOR OF ARBITRATION JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) and Wachovia Bank, N.A.’s (‘Wachovia”) Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Stay in Favor, of Arbitration (DE # 1384), filed ■ April 29, 2011. The Court is fully briefed in the m

Opinion CHANEY, J. Petitioners Eduardo Garcia, Garcia Transportation GP, and Luis Torres-Garzon 1 seek relief from the April 25, 2014 order of respondent court (Michael P. Vicencia, Judge) granting the motion of real party in interest Southern Counties Express, Inc., to compel arbitration of Petition

OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court are the parties’ arguments as to whether there is sufficient “cause” to grant plaintiffs relief from the automatic stay imposed by section 405(b) of the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”), Pub. L. No. 114-187, 130 Stat. 549 (2016). For the reasons discussed below, the Court holds that there is not and therefo

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Brief in Support of Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), filed September 29, 2017 (Doc. 19)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on June 4, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whe

ACCEPTED 13-13-00549-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 1/6/2015 11:12:49 AM