⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Gallegos v. Social Security Administration”

Gallegos v. Astruepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 237 F. App'x 135
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in the majority opinion but write separately because I believe the ALJ’s determination of past relevant experience was not supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, I believe this case should be reversed and remanded for reconsideration regardless of Gallegos’ date of disability. In order for Gallegos’ one month of work as a cannery line
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004-06-02 · Published · cited 5× · 99 F. App'x 222
ORDER AND JUDGMENT* DAVID M. EBEL, Circuit Judge. This matter is before the court on appellant’s petition for rehearing. Upon consideration, the petition for rehearing is denied, but the panel amends its order and judgment filed on March 30, 2004, to clarify its discussion of the terms “frequent” and “repetitive.” The March 30, 2004 order and judgment is withdrawn and a copy o
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003-10-22 · Published · cited 0× · 80 F. App'x 10
MEMORANDUM ** Reuben Gallegos appeals the denial of his claim for social security disability and supplemental income benefits. We review de novo the district court’s decision affirming the Commissioner’s denial of benefits. Johnson v. Shalala, 60 F.3d 1428, 1432 (9th Cir.1995). The decision of the Commissioner must be affirmed if it is supported by substantial evidence and the Commissioner applied t
Stanley v. Gallegospublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017-03-17 · Published · cited 2× · 852 F.3d 1210; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4816; 2017 WL 1032572
HOLMES, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment I concur but only in the judgment. I respectfully disagree with the Lead Opinion’s (i.e., the opinion of Judge Hartz) decision to apply a variant of the “scope-of-authority exception to qualified immunity,” L. Op. at 1211, in resolving this case.1 The Supreme Court and our court have consistently engaged in a two-pronged inquir
Gallegos v. Frezzapublic domain
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015-03-19 · Published · cited 4× · 8 N.M. Ct. App. 623; 2015 NMCA 101
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: _______________ 3 Filing Date: March 19, 2015 4 NOS. 32,605 & 32,606 (Consolidated) 5 FERNANDO GALLEGOS, 6 Plaintiff-Appellant, 7 v. 8 ELDO FREZZA, M.D., 9 Defendant-Appellee, 10 and 11 PRESBYTERIAN HEALTH PLAN, INC., 12 A New Mexico Domestic For-Profit Corporation, 13 Defendant. 14 Consolidated With 15 NELLIE GONZALES, 16 Plaintiff-Appellant, 17 v. 18 ELDO FREZZA, M.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2021-08-11 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-20-00483-CV David DREW, Jr., Appellant v. Arlette Dominguez Gallegos BELVER,
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017-09-30 · Published · cited 16× · 278 F. Supp. 3d 1245
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Bernalillo County Board of County Commissioners’ (“Bernalillo County”) Motion to Dismiss, filed January 6, 2017 (Doc. 45)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on June 2, 2017. The primary issues are: (i) whether the' Defendant Ber-nalillo County Board of County Commissioners’ Motion
Gallegos v. Goberpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000-08-11 · Published · cited 0× · 14 Vet. App. 50; 2000 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 791; 2000 WL 1133599
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO . 99-106 RAYMOND GALLEGOS, APPELLANT , V. HERSHEL W. GOBER, ACTING SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Decided August 11, 2000 )
Terry v. Gallegospublic domain
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1996-05-16 · Published · cited 8× · 926 F. Supp. 679; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8003; 1996 WL 263380
926 F.Supp. 679 (1996) Joseph Ray TERRY, Plaintiff, v. Tony E. GALLEGOS, Chairman of the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Defendant. No. 92-2729-MI/A. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee. May 16, 1996. *680 *681 *682
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000-04-27 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 99-2022 Rita Moreno Gallegos, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mt. Sinai Medical Center and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 97 C 6207--Joan B. Gottschall, Judge. Argued January 6, 2000--Decided April 27, 2000 Before Coffey, Flaum and Kanne, Circuit Judges. Flaum, Circuit Judge.
Gallegos v. Statepublic domain
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988-06-30 · Published · cited 27× · 758 P.2d 299; 107 N.M. 349
758 P.2d 299 (1987) Phillip GALLEGOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE of New Mexico, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 9072. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. December 15, 1987. Certiorari Quashed June 30, 1988. *300 Ray M. Vargas, Albuquerque, for plaintiff-appellant. Douglas A. Baker, Modrall, Sperling, Roeh
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000-04-27 · Published · cited 62× · 210 F.3d 803; 24 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1677; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8172; 2000 WL 490749
FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Rita Moreno Gallegos was an employee of Mt. Sinai Medical Center (“Mt. Sinai”) who applied for employee welfare benefits with Mt. Sinai’s insurance carrier UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (“UNUM”). Her request for benefits was denied, and Gallegos filed suit, claiming that this denial violates the Employee Retirement Insurance Security Act (“ERISA”),
Michigan Supreme Court · 1972-12-21 · Published · cited 21× · 202 N.W.2d 786; 388 Mich. 654; 1972 Mich. LEXIS 143
Adams, J. I agree with Justice T. G. Kavanagh that the provisions of § 115(d) of 1969 PA 317 (MCLA 418.115[d]; MSA 17.237[115][d]), violate plaintiffs’ rights to equal protection provided for in the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Michigan.. However, I arrive at this conclusion by a somewhat different route. Certain factual stipulations were entered into at the w
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016-11-22 · Published · cited 2× · 513 S.W.3d 114; 2016 WL 6886881; 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 12460
OPINION Marc W. Brown, Justice Appellee Houston Municipal Employees Pension System (“HMEPS”) brought a verified petition against appellants City of Houston (the “City”), Annise D. Parker, Kelly Dowe, Ronald C. Green, Brenda Stardig, Jerry Davis, Ellen Cohen, Dwight Boykins, Dave Martin, Richard Nguyen, Oliver Pennington, Ed Gonzalez, Robert Gallegos, Mik
Supreme Court of the United States · 1993-06-18 · Published · cited 734× · 125 L. Ed. 2d 38; 113 S. Ct. 2485; 509 U.S. 43; 1993 U.S. LEXIS 4209; 61 U.S.L.W. 4652; 93 Daily Journal DAR 7703; 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4504; 7 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 442
Justice Souter delivered the opinion of the Court. This petition joins two separate suits, each challenging a different regulation issued by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) in administering the alien legalization program created by Title II of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. In each instance, a District Court struck down the regulation challenged and issued a remedial order dire
Alaska Supreme Court · 2025-03-28 · Published · cited 0×
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA STATE OF ALASKA, DEPARTMENT ) OF FAMILY & COMMUNITY ) Supreme Court Nos. S-18249/18259 SERVICES,
District Court, D. Kansas · 1996-10-25 · Published · cited 14× · 946 F. Supp. 1556; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17899; 74 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1275; 1996 WL 699378
946 F.Supp. 1556 (1996) Leslie Ann JEFFRIES, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF KANSAS, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND REHABILITATION SERVICES, and The Reverend Dr. Ed Outlaw, Jr., Defendants. No. 95-4047-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. October 25, 1996. *1557 *1558 *
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998-02-17 · Published · cited 8× · 962 S.W.2d 897; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 268; 1998 WL 60420
962 S.W.2d 897 (1998) Travis J. TARANTO, Respondent, v. STATE of Missouri DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, and Elizabeth E. Hamilton, Appellants. No. WD 53986. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. February 17, 1998. *898 Lera L. Shemwell, Jefferson City, for appellants. Abe Shaf
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996-05-03 · Published · cited 93× · 82 F.3d 903
82 F.3d 903 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3120, 96 Daily JournalD.A.R. 5161Rosaura GONZALEZ, Rosaura Gonzalez Gallegos; Betty JeanethCatuse, Petitioners,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70881. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 15, 1996.Decided May 3, 1996.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000-11-30 · Published · cited 37× · 233 F.3d 1166; 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9438; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 29978
233 F.3d 1166 (9th Cir. 2000) JERRY R. SHARP; CURTIS BEARD, aka Tony Wilson; ELMER CAMPBELL; JOEL SCOTT REIMER; RONALD L. PETERSEN; JOSEPH AQUI; GILBERTO SOLIZ; HERMAN R. PASCHKE; RICHARD G. TURAY; JOHN F. HALL; PAUL BEGAY; RANDY PEDERSEN; ANTHONY GALLEGOS; DENNIS PRYOR; ROLANDO T. AGUILAR; SAMUEL WILLIAM DONAGHE, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.DAVID B. WESTON; WILLIAM DEHMER; JOHN ANDERSON-TAYLOR; NORM NELSON; KIM VANDOREN; JACK SOWERS; JOHN RUSH;