Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gale N Barfield”
State v. Barfieldpublic domain
272 Neb. 502 STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. TERRY A. BARFIELD, APPELLANT. No. S-05-973. Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed November 3, 2006. Glenn A. Shapiro and Jill A. Daley, of Gallup & Schaefer, for appellant. Jon Bruning, Attorney General, and Kimberly A. Klein for appellee. WRIGHT, CONNOLLY, GERRARD, STEPHAN, McCORMACK, and MILLER-LERMAN, JJ.,
Murray v. Sevierpublic domain
50 F.Supp.2d 1257 (1999) Bradley E. MURRAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Helen SEVIER, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. A. 94-D-1266-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. June 8, 1999. *1258 *1259 Bobby Lee Cook, Cook & Palmour, Summerville, GA, Robert Blakey, University
San Antonio State Hospital v. Lopezpublic domain
82 S.W.3d 566 (2002) SAN ANTONIO STATE HOSPITAL, Appellant, v. Louis C. LOPEZ, Appellee. No. 04-01-00755-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. May 15, 2002. Rehearing Overruled June 13, 2002. *567 Joseph D. Hughes, Asst. Solicitor Gen., Austin, for Appellant. Christopher J. Gale, Mark Anthony Sanchez
State v. Hayniepublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 08/16/2024 09:10 AM CDT - 371 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 317 Nebraska Reports STATE V. HAYNIE Cite as 317 Neb. 371 State of Nebraska, ap
North Carolina State Bar v. Gilbertpublic domain
663 S.E.2d 1 (2008) The NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, Plaintiff v. Willie D. GILBERT, II, Defendant. No. COA07-74. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 18, 2008. The North Carolina State Bar, by Deputy Counsel A. Root Edmonson, for plaintiff-appellee. Michaux & Michaux, P.A., by Eric C. Michaux, Durham, for defendant-appellant. McCULLOUGH, Judge.<
Mason v. Mitchell's Contracting Service, LLCpublic domain
ORDER CALLIE V.S. GRANADE, District Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 37). The parties have filed briefs and evidentiary materials in support of their respective positions (Docs. 38, 41, 47, 48, 50, 55, 58, and 61), and the motion is now ripe for resolution. After careful consideration of the foregoing, the court concludes that the motio
Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Estate of Castanopublic domain
PER CURIAM. Counsel for the plaintiff made prejudicial comments during closing argument in an eight-day negligence action. Although the remarks were improper, they were made in response to arguments of the defense, Gale v. State, 483 So.2d 53 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 492 So.2d 1332 (Fla.1986), were not preserved for review by a timely and proper objection, White Constr. Co. v. DuPont, 455 So.2d
Squires ex rel. Squires v. Goodwinpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CRAIG B. SHAFFER, United States Magistrate Judge. This civil action comes before the court on Defendant Breckenridge Outdoor Education Center’s (BOEC’s) Motion for Summary Judgment (filed December 3, 2010) (Doc. # 52). On September 16, 2010, the above-captioned case was referred to Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer to handle all dispositive matters including trial and entry of
In Re Swepi, L.P.public domain
85 S.W.3d 800 (2002) In re SWEPI, L.P., Kinder Morgan CO2 Company, L.P., Shell Western E & P, Inc., and Shell CO2 Company, Ltd., Relators. No. 01-0353. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued February 6, 2002. Decided August 29, 2002. Rehearing Denied October 24, 2002. Marie R. Yeates, Phillip Dye, Jr., Vinson & Elkins, Houston, R. William W
Ciampitti v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. This action, brought pursuant to the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, is before the court after trial solely on the issue of liability. Plaintiffs claim that the denial by the United States Army Corps of Engineers of a permit to fill wetlands on their property constituted a taking without compensation. For the reasons set out below, the court concludes that the p
Abbott v. United Statespublic domain
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ___________________________________ ) DANNY L. ABBOTT, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) No. 15-211 L ) v. ) Filed: September 28, 2022 ) THE UNITED STATES, ) )
Brooks v. Galen of West Virginia, Inc.public domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 701 SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. "A trial court is vested with discretion under W. Va. Code § 55-7B-7 (1986) to require expert testimony in medical professional liability cases, and absent an abuse of that discretion, a trial court's decision will not b
HCA Health Services of Tennessee, Inc. v. Thompsonpublic domain
207 F.Supp.2d 719 (2002) HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF TENNESSEE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Tommy G. THOMPSON, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. No. 3:00-0991. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. April 2, 2002. *720 H. Lee Barfield, II, W. Brantley Phillip
United States v. Smithpublic domain
Opinion of the Court SULLIVAN, Chief Judge: On July 29, 1992, this Court issued an opinion in this case (34 MJ 319, 324) setting aside the decision of the Court of Military Review (32 MJ 567 (1991)) and remanding *449the record to that court for further review. On January 15, 1993, the Court of Military Review issued a second opinion in
Berger v. New Hanover Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rspublic domain
Berger v. New Hanover Cnty. Bd. of Comm’rs, 2013 NCBC 45. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER 13 CVS 1942 BRIAN BERGER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. )
Robertson v. BD. OF COUNTY COM'RS COUNTY OF MORGANpublic domain
78 F.Supp.2d 1142 (1999) Marian ROBERTSON, Paula Ace, Betty L. Anderson, Clinton Coffin, Jeff Littlefield, Bruce E. Snelson, Vince Talty, Timothy W. Willert, Mary Ann Wooldridge, Travis Hodge, Vicki Nida, Scott Mellinger, Janis Mayhan, and Tracy Robinson Plaintiffs, v. The BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF MORGAN, Defendant. Civil Action No. 96-B-629. United States District Court, D. Color
STATE, DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY v. Kropffpublic domain
491 So.2d 1252 (1986) STATE OF Florida, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY and MOTOR VEHICLES, Division of HIGHWAY PATROL, Appellant, v. Susan Ann KROPFF, Appellee. No. 84-2617. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. July 29, 1986. *1253 William H. Peeples, South Miami, Richard M. Gale, Miami, for appellant. Rossma
United States v. Robert Almonte, United States of America v. Michael P. Ricapito, Joseph F. Corrigan, Jr.public domain
COFFIN, Chief Judge. Appellants were convicted of fraudulent possession and sale of counterfeit Federal Reserve Notes and of conspiracy. On appeal, some or all of the appellants challenge the sufficiency of the government’s affidavit supporting its application for a wiretap, alleged multiplicity in the conspiracy count, the trial court’s refusal to reread large amounts of testim
State v. Flowerspublic domain
489 S.E.2d 391 (1997) STATE of North Carolina v. Wendell FLOWERS. No. 553A94. Supreme Court of North Carolina. September 5, 1997. *398 Michael F. Easley, Attorney General by Ellen B. Scouten, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State. David G. Belser and A. James Siemens, Asheville, for defendant-appellant. LAK
State v. Velapublic domain
777 N.W.2d 266 (2010) 279 Neb. 94 STATE of Nebraska, appellee, v. Erick Fernando VELA, appellant. No. S-07-138. Supreme Court of Nebraska. January 8, 2010. *274 James R. Mowbray, Jeffery A. Pickens, and Jerry L. Soucie, of Nebraska Commission on Public Advocacy, Lincoln, and Mark D. Albin, Norfolk, of Albi