Cases

PER CURIAM. Appellant raises two points on appeal, only one of which merits discussion. She contends that the written judgment of conviction contains a scrivener’s error in that she should have been sentenced as an habitual felony offender instead of an habitual violent felony offender. The State concedes error. We affirm Appellant’s conviction but remand this case to the trial court to correct the scrivener’s error in the j

MEMORANDUM * California state prisoner Jeffrey Galbraith appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus. We affirm. We review the denial of a habeas petition de novo. Lara v. Ryan, 455 F.3d 1080, 1084 (9th Cir.2006). In reviewing the merits of the petition, we apply the deferential standards of review set forth in the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death

ORDER ROBERT H. HENRY, Circuit Judge. Steven Galbraith, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of' his civil rights complaints brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Mr. Galbraith also seeks to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) and requests the appointment of counsel. Mr. Galbraith filed separate caus

BEA, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. “Ordinarily, the decision to file a criminal complaint is presumed to result from an independent determination on the part of the prosecutor, and thus, precludes liability for those who participated in the investigation or filed a report that resulted in the initiation of proceedings.” Awabdy v. City of Adelan

OPINION SCHROEDER, Chief Judge. This appeal involves a claim that a county coroner falsified an autopsy report, leading to the false arrest and prosecution of plaintiff Nelson Galbraith (“Galbraith”) for murder in violation of his constitutional rights. The central question is whether a heightened pleading standard should continue to apply to constitutional tort claims in which improper motive is an elem

[Cite as State v. Galbraith, 2012-Ohio-5231.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 9-11-61 v. MICHAEL T. GALBRAITH, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Marion County Common Pleas Court

BURNETT, Judge. Preston Galbraith stands convicted of aggravated assault for striking and seriously injuring his infant daughter. Judgment of conviction was entered upon his plea of guilty after the charge against him was reduced from aggravated battery, as origi*380nally alleged. Galbraith received an indeterminate sentence of five years in custody of the Board of Co

769 P.2d 1294 (1989) Sue Galbraith GEISSEL, Executrix of the Estate of Donald Bennett Galbraith, Appellant, v. Rosemary E. GALBRAITH, Respondent. No. 18890. Supreme Court of Nevada. March 9, 1989. *1295 John Peter Lee and Grenville Thomas Pridham, Las Vegas, for appellant. Brown, Wells, Kravitz & Schnitzer, Las Vegas,

Lawson A. Cloninger, Judge. On this appeal from a decision of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission, the only issue is whether the claim is barred by the statute of limitations. Claimant-appellee, George Galbraith, was injured on August 1, 1971 when a piece of steel lodged in his eye while he was welding a bumper on a vehicle. The injury caused a 40% loss of vision in

644 S.W.2d 926 (1983) 278 Ark. 185 CORNISH WELDING SHOP and Traders Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. George GALBRAITH, Employee, Respondent. No. 82-236. Supreme Court of Arkansas. January 17, 1983. Rehearing Denied February 21, 1983. Brown, Compton & Prewett, Ltd., by Floyd M. Thomas, Jr., El Dorado, for petitioners.

RALPH B. GUY, JR., Circuit Judge, concurring in result. I concur in the result reached by the court, but disassociate myself from part III, which I feel involves impermissible factfinding at the appellate level. I am not sure why Northern Telecom discharged the plaintiff. I am convinced, however, that plaintiff failed to show that the reason given by the company was a mere pretext to mask racial animus.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 334 {¶ 1} Defendant, J.J. Detweiler Enterprises, Inc., appeals a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Guernsey County, Ohio, entered in favor of plaintiffs-appellees Wilbur L. and Sylvia S. Galbraith in appellees' action to quiet title to a strip of property 12 feet wide, widening to 13.72 fe

307 F.3d 1119 Nelson GALBRAITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, a Municipality of the State of California; Angelo Ozoa, MD, individually, and in his official capacity as Santa Clara County Chief Medical Examiner-Coroner, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-17369. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 11, 2002.

427 S.E.2d 187 (1993) Jeannette Anne GALBRAITH v. Jeffrey Fred FLEMING, et al. Record No. 920642. Supreme Court of Virginia. February 26, 1993. Robert A. Rapaport, Norfolk (Knight, Dudley, Dezern & Clarke, on brief), for appellant. Gary B. Mims, Fairfax (Brault, Palmer, Grove, Zimmerman, White & Mims, on brief), for appellees. Present: All the

Effie K. Galbraith sued her husband, Edward M. Galbraith, for divorce, setting up extreme cruelty, wilful desertion and neglect. The court found against her; and from the judgment and order denying her motion for a new trial she has appealed, assigning insufficiency of the evidence to support the findings and error in the conclusions drawn therefrom. The exhibits admitted have neither been included in the transcript nor separately certified; and there is no evidence

BUDGE, C. J. — This is an original application by the plaintiff praying for an order for allowance of alimony pending appeal. From the record it appears that the plaintiff brought an action for divorce against the defendant in the district court of the sixth judicial district. To plaintiff’s complaint defendant filed an answer and cross-complaint. Whereupon plaintiff filed an answer to the cross-complaint. Upon the issues thus fra

03/01/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 10, 2017 HENRY THOMAS JOHNSON v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. 40700905 Jill Bartee Ayers, Judge __________________________

PLAGER, Circuit Judge. This ease pits a government agency against an ostensibly undesirable employee who complains that the agency, having promised not to tell future employers about the employee’s performance, broke its promise. The employee, who had agreed to resign in exchange for the agency’s promise, wants to renege on his agreement. When the agency refused to let him, he t

ACCEPTED 03-17-00801-CV 21620340 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/4/2

733 P.2d 1325 (1986) 105 N.M. 442 Dennis R. BOUCHER and Cindy Boucher, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FOXWORTH-GALBRAITH LUMBER COMPANY, A foreign corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 8116. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. December 30, 1986. Certiorari Denied March 5, 1987. *1326 Roy G. Hill,