Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
10 opinions for “Gabriel Anthony Fusco”
People v. Fuscopublic domain
Habold M. Spitzes, J. The defendant, Pasquale Fusco, has made five omnibus motions to suppress evidence; all of the 49 defendants join in these motions. Each motion is addressed to one of a series of five interrelated wiretap orders issued in 1972. The first order was issued by the Hon. Paul Kelly on April 25, 1972 authorizing the interception of communications made over a telephone being used by defendant Tim Gabriel, otherwis
In Re Reveleypublic domain
148 B.R. 398 (1992) In re Robert J. REVELEY, Alleged Debtor. In re James E. FUSCO, Alleged Debtor. In re William M. FOLBERTH, III, Alleged Debtor. In re Nicholas W. KAUFMANN, Alleged Debtor. Bankruptcy Nos. 91-11262 (TLB) to 91-11265 (TLB). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. December 28, 1992. *399
Williams v. City of Pittsburghpublic domain
32 F.Supp.2d 236 (1998) Ernest WILLIAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, et al., Defendants. Stephanie Wimbs and Dorothy Wimbs, Plaintiffs, v. SGT. J.A. Kearney, Deputy Sheriff of Allegheny County, et al., Nos. CIV. A. 96-560, CIV. A. 98-229. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. December 29, 1998. James W. Carroll, Jr., Tabakin, Ca
v. Surgery Centerpublic domain
The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.
People v. Priscopublic domain
Hyman Korn, J. The defendants move for the vacatur of the search warrant issued on the 2nd day of February, 1962 by Hon. Samuel J. Ohringer, a City Magistrate, for the suppression of the evidence seized under such warrant, and for the return of the evidence so seized which predicates an indictment alleging violations of section 1372 of the Penal Law (contriving, drawing, and assisting in a lottery) and section 974-a of the Penal
McDonough v. Whalenpublic domain
365 Mass. 506 (1974) 313 N.E.2d 435 ROBERT E. McDONOUGH, JR., & another vs. WILLIAM T. WHALEN (and a companion case[1]). Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Bristol. April 4, 1974. June 24, 1974. Present: TAURO, C.J., REARDON, QUIRICO, BRAUCHER, & WILKINS, JJ. Donald J. Fleming for the plaintiffs.
Messier v. Southbury Training Schoolpublic domain
562 F.Supp.2d 294 (2008) Richard MESSIER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SOUTHBURY TRAINING SCHOOL, et al., Defendants. No. 3:94-CV-1706 (EBB). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. June 5, 2008. *297 David C. Shaw, Law Offices of David C. Shaw, Bloomfield, CT, Frank J. Laski, Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee, Boston, MA, B
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Registerpublic domain
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department
United States v. Polizzipublic domain
(2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Peter POLIZZI, Defendant. No. 06-CR-22 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 1, 2008. MEMORANDUM, ORDER & JUDGMENT JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction.....................................................................