Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “GUARDIAN FUND, LLC - Adversary Proceeding”
WM High Yield Fund v. O'Hanlonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM LEGROME D, DAVIS, District Judge. Plaintiffs1 — six institutional Funds that invested in debt securities issued by Diagnostic Ventures, Inc. (DVI, Inc.)2 — sue for violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. They also seek imposition of liability
In re Chardon, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Thomas M. Lynch, United States Bankruptcy Judge Chardon, LLC and the seven affiliated entities who commenced voluntary Chapter 11 cases2 seek to employ attorneys Neal L. Wolf and associated attorneys as bankruptcy counsel pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 327(a). (EFC No. 56.) The United States Trustee and a secured creditor, FirstMerit Bank, N.A., object.
Clear Sky Properties LLC v. Roussel (In re Roussel)public domain
ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. Appellants Clear Sky Properties LLC (“Clear Sky”) and LuAnn Deere (“Deere”) commenced this adversary proceeding, seeking a determination that a judgment debt of Appellee Blake Roussel (“Roussel”) is nondischargeable in bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(4) and 523(a)(6). Appellants appeal the final decision of the Bankruptcy Court,1
Sheri Bluebond, United States Bankruptcy Judge The parties' motion for summary adjudication of issues based on stipulated facts (the "Motion") came on for hearing before the above-entitled Court on March 6, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants the request of RIF Investments-3, LLC ("RIF") for an adjudication that it is entitled to payment of the $24,400.70 deposited with the Los Angeles Superior Court
First American Title Ins. v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas - Kansas Citypublic domain
FILED U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit December 4, 2014 PUBLISH Blaine F. Bates
Tracey N. Wise, Bankruptcy Judge This matter is before the Court on Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Phaedra Spradlin, Chapter 7 Trustee of the Debtors' Estates ("Trustee") [ECF No. 199 ("Trustee's Motion") ],1 and Defendants East Coast Miner, LLC ("ECM") [ECF No. 189 ("ECM's Motion") ], East Coast Miner II, LLC ("ECM II") [ECF No. 190 ("ECM II's Motion") ], Keith Goggin [ECF No. 191 ("Go
Wypie Investments, LLC v. Homschekpublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WYPIE INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. Nl4C-08-l40 WCC CCLD WAYNE HOMSCHEK, individually, PIE FACE HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED, an Australian company, and PIE FACE HOLDINGS, INC. a Delaware corporation, \/\./\/\/\./\_/\_/\/VVVV\_/V Defendants. Submitted: March 22, 2018 Decided: March 28, 2018 Defendants Wayne Homschek and Pie Face Holdings PTY Limited’s Motion to Dismiss - GRANTED in Part and DENIED in P
DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS COUNTS 2, 6, 7, 14, AND 18 ROBERT E, GERBER, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE In late December 2007, Basell AF S.C.A. 0‘BaseH”), a Luxembourg entity controlled *433by Leonard Blavatnik (“Blavatnik”), acquired Lyondell Chemical Company (“Lyondell”), a Delaware corporation headquartered in Houston —
Stanziale v. Sprint Corp. (In re Simplexity, LLC)public domain
Re: Adv. D.I. Nos. 29, 36 OPINION KEVIN GROSS, U.S.B.J. INTRODUCTION On March 16, 2014 (the “Petition Date”), Simplexity, LLC (“Simplexity”) and its affiliates (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. D.I. 1. On January 7, 2016, the Court entered an order (th
LB Steel, LLC v. Carlo Steel Corp.public domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Feldman v. American Asset Finance, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM C. DARNELL JONES, II, District Judge. On appeal is a decision of the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee American Asset Finance and holding that, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6), Appellant’s debt is not dis-chargeable in bankruptcy. Appellant also challenges the Bankruptcy Court’s decision to grant leave to file an
Burtch v. Opus, LLC (In re Opus East, LLC)public domain
OPINION1 Mary F. Walrath, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND. . .48 II. JURISDICTION.. .48 III. FACTUAL BACKGROUND.. .48 IV. DISCUSSION...50 A. Insolvency... 50 1. Balance Sheet Test... 51 2. Inadequate Capi
Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. RPX Corp.public domain
Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge Reyna. O'Malley, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from three inter partes reviews ("IPRs") challenging claims of two patents owned by Appellant Applications in Internet Time, LLC ("AIT"): U.S. Patent Nos. 7,356,482 ("the '482 patent") and 8,484,111 ("the '111 patent"). The Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("Board") of the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") inst
Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District In Division In the Matter of ) KYONG SPRUILL, An Adult, ) ) J-PIA SPRUILL, ) ) Petitioner-Respondent, ) ) v.
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
ACCEPTED 01-15-00774-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/8/2015 6:53:36
ACCEPTED 15-25-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2025 11:54 AM No. 15-25-000120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Abednego v. St. Croix Alumina, LLCpublic domain
BRADY, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 10, 2015) THIS MATTER is before the Court on a motion filed by 198 former plaintiffs (“Former Plaintiffs”), through their counsel Lee J. Rohn, Esq., requesting relief from an order that the District Court of the Virgin Islands issued dismissing the Former Plaintiffs from this action while it was before that court on removal. St. Croix Re
Beg Investments, LLC v. Albertipublic domain
Re Document Nos.: 14, 18, 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting Defendants’ Motion to Strike or Dismiss the Amended • Complaint, Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion to File Supplemental Complaint, and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS ____________________________________ EREZ HOLDINGS URBAN RENEWAL, : TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY LLC, : : DOCKET NO. 013941-2018 Plaintiff, : v. : : Approved for Publication DIRECTOR,