Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “GREGORY ALLEN RUFFIN”
Clive v. Gregorypublic domain
635 S.E.2d 188 (2006) CLIVE et al. v. GREGORY et al. Aim Land, Inc. v. Clive et al. Nos. A06A0541, A06A0542. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 13, 2006. Reconsiderations denied July 13, 2006. *190 George Shingler, Casey Gilson Leibel P.C., Matthew Williams, Casey, Gilson & Williams, P.C., Atlanta,
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Ortiz, Friedman and White PUBLISHED Argued at Christiansburg, Virginia GREGORY ALLEN MARLOWE OPINION BY v. Record No. 0789-23-3 JUDGE FRANK K. FRIEDMAN JULY 30,
Allen L. Ruffin v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be Nov 13 2015, 9:41 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Gregory L. Fumarolo Gregory F. Zoeller Fort Wayne, Indiana
Price v. Statepublic domain
658 S.E.2d 382 (2008) PRICE v. The STATE. No. A07A2349. Court of Appeals of Georgia. February 26, 2008. *383 Gregory A. Hicks, Woodstock, for appellant. Garry T. Moss, District Attorney, Allen D. Morris, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. BERNES, Judge. A Cherokee County jury found Keith Price guilty
Ruffin v. Sawchynpublic domain
Third-party defendant-appellant Nationwide Insurance Company ("Nationwide") appeals from the declaratory judgment of the trial court which found that Nationwide had failed to defend a former policyholder in a negligence action. As a result, Nationwide was ordered to indemnify the policyholder for damages awarded in the concluded negligence action, and pay the attorney fees incurred by the policyholder as a result of Nationwide's failure to provide a defense. For the reasons adduced below, we
Bynum v. Gregorypublic domain
215 Ga. App. 431 (1994) BYNUM et al. v. GREGORY et al. A94A1238. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided November 21, 1994. Reconsideration Denied December 5, 1994. *435 Bird, Ballard & Still, William L. Ballard, for appellants. Long, Weinberg, Ansley & Wheeler, Sidney F. Wheeler, Lance D. L
Security Life Insurance v. Clarkpublic domain
547 S.E.2d 691 (2001) 249 Ga. App. 18 SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CLARK et al. No. A97A1136. Court of Appeals of Georgia. April 3, 2001. *692 Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, William D. Barwick, Teresa W. Roseborough, Robert J. Neis, Amelia T. Rudolph, Carla W. McMillian, Atlanta, for appellant.
Ford v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.public domain
Eldridge, Judge, dissenting. I concur in the dissent of Presiding Judge McMurray; however, I wish to point out a case regarding admissions in judicio as to venue that controls this issue. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Company (“UGTC”) came into the suit by a consent order for substitution. UGTC in both suits admitted venue in Fulton County. In Nadew v. Alemu, 217 Ga. App. 438
Humber v. Lexington-Fayette Urban Cnty. Gov'tpublic domain
NICKELL, JUDGE: Sean Humber, Dominico Morbley, Aaron Ruffin, Gregory Stokes, Kem Anderson and Tim Anderson, individually and through their guardians have appealed from the March 21, 2016, order of the Fayette Circuit Court dismissing their complaint against Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government ("LFUCG"). Following a careful review, we affirm. The factual and procedural history underlying this matter are lengthy
Security Life Insurance v. Clarkpublic domain
Andrews, Presiding Judge, dissenting. I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion which affirms a judgment on a RICO claim against Security Life Insurance Company. 1. In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion, which affirmed in part and reversed in part our decision, and the law of the case as established in the remaining portions of our original opinion, that claim is now based
Ford v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.public domain
Smith, Judge. In Ford v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 270 Ga. 730 (514 SE2d 201) (1999), the Supreme Court reversed the judgments of this court affirming the trial court’s grant of appellees’ motions to transfer the cases from Fulton County. Ford v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 231 Ga. App. 11 (497 SE2d 596) (1998). Accordingly, our judgments in those cases are vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is ma
Edmondson v. Gilmorepublic domain
554 S.E.2d 742 (2001) 251 Ga. App. 776 EDMONDSON et al. v. GILMORE. No. A01A0838. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 13, 2001. Reconsideration Denied October 9, 2001. *743 Griner & Mirate, Galen A. Mirate, Melinda M. Katz, Thomasville, for appellants. Saliba & Moore, Geo
AMBLING MANAGEMENT COMPANY v. Purdypublic domain
640 S.E.2d 620 (2006) AMBLING MANAGEMENT COMPANY v. PURDY. Purdy v. Ambling Management Company. Nos. A06A1409, A06A1410. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 28, 2006. Reconsideration Denied December 15, 2006. *622 Fields, Howell, Athans & McLaughlin, Michael J. Athans, Gregory O. Shenton, Atlant
Ray v. Statepublic domain
665 S.E.2d 345 (2008) RAY v. The STATE. No. A08A0714. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 12, 2008. Reconsideration Denied July 9, 2008. *347 Jeffrey L. Grube, Centerville, for appellant. Kelly R. Burke, District Attorney, for appellee. RUFFIN, Presiding Judge. Following a bench trial, the tria
Newman v. Greenpublic domain
198 F.Supp.2d 664 (2002) Gregory A. NEWMAN, Plaintiff, v. Charles O. GREEN, et al., Defendants. Gregory A. Newman, Plaintiff, v. State of Maryland, Defendant. Nos. AMD 01-1906, AMD 01-3825. United States District Court, D. Maryland. Filed: April 29, 2002. *665 Diane Martin Littlepage, Glen Burnie, MD, for Plaintiff.</
State v. Cartopublic domain
FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER, Judge. |2In this criminal appeal, defendant claims that he was denied his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel at the trial level in connection with' his guilty plea to armed robbery in violation of La. R.S. 14:64. Defendant claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to reserve defendant’s right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress his state
Moyer v. Commonwealthpublic domain
UPON A REHEARING EN BANC ELDER, Judge. Gregory A. Moyer (appellant) was convicted in a bench trial on fourteen counts of taking indecent liberties with a minor pursuant to Code § 18.2-370.1. On appeal, he contends the trial court erroneously ruled that (1) police seizure of his personal journals pursuant to a search warrant and the admission of the journals into e
Paice, LLC v. Hyundai Motor Co.public domain
Memorandum Opinion SUSAN K. GAUVEY, United States Magistrate Judge. Presently pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to strike (ECF No. 190). Briefing is complete. A hearing on this motion, Plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions (ECF No. 181) and Defendants’ motion to compel (ECF No. 184), was held on May 20, 2014. For the reasons discussed herein, the motion is GRANTED. I
Moyer v. Commonwealthpublic domain
520 S.E.2d 371 (1999) 30 Va. App. 744 Gregory Allen MOYER v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 2959-97-2. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Richmond. October 26, 1999. *372 W. Reilly Marchant (Thorsen, Marchant & Scher L.L.P., on briefs), Richmond, for appellant. Donald E. Jeffrey, III, Assistant
Little Sky, Inc. v. Rybkapublic domain
592 S.E.2d 154 (2003) 264 Ga. App. 744 LITTLE SKY, INC. et al. v. RYBKA et al. No. A03A1223. Court of Appeals of Georgia. December 1, 2003. Reconsideration Denied December 16, 2003. Certiorari Denied March 29, 2004. *155 Fred L. Cavalli, Christopher J. McFadden, Decatur, f