Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “GLORIA MARTINEZ BAS”
Gloria Barajas v. Karen Wise, Parole Agentpublic domain
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. In August 1998, a Fresno County, California, Superior Court jury convicted Petitioner-Appellee Gloria Barajas (“Barajas”) of conspiring to sell, possessing, transporting, and offering to sell heroin based on the testimony of an undercover informant. She was sentenced to three years in state prison. Her direct appeals failed, as did her state habeas petitio
La Gloria Oil & Gas Co. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION HEWITT, Judge. This case is one of twenty-three cases dealing with some or all of the issues addressed in the opinion of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Tesoro Hawaii Corp. v. United States, 405 F.3d 1339 (Fed.Cir.2005) (Tesoro II), reh’g denied and reh’g en banc denied, Tesoro Hawaii Corp. v. United States, 2005 U.S.App. LEXIS 19620 (Fed.Cir. Aug. 22, 2005).
FOMB v. Cooperativa de Ahorro y Creditopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1079 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT
In Re Reinforced Earth, Co.public domain
925 F.Supp. 913 (1996) In re REINFORCED EARTH, CO., and others La Colina and Oasis Gardens Litigation. Civil No. 93-1874 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 3, 1996. *914 Harvey B. Nachman, Nachman, Santiago, Bray, Guillemard & Carrion, Santurce, PR, for Carmelo Lartigue-Henriquez, Myrna Castro-De Lartigue, Con
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Motion to Supplement and/or Complete the Administrative Record, and for Limited Discovery, filed November 25, 2013 (Doe. 106) (“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on November 7, 2014. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Plaintiffs have shown that Defendant United States Forest Service acte
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION1 JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Federal Defendants’ Motion to Dis-*1020misa Count 1 for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies, filed February 18, 2013 (Doc. 55)(“MTD”). The Court held a hearing on July 26, 2013. The primary issue
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Federal Defendants’ Motion and Memorandum to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Remaining Claims, filed February 10, 2015 (Doc. 144) (“MTD”). The Court held a hearing on May 21, 2015. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Plaintiffs who suffer no economic injury can establish standing; ‘ (it) whether th
FOMB v. Cooperativa de Ahorro y Creditopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1119 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
FOMB v. Cooperativa de Ahorro y Creditopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1092 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
FOMB v. Cooperativa de Ahorro y Creditopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1120 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
United States v. Torrespublic domain
128 F.3d 38 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Robert TORRES, also known as Roberto Torres-Amaro, alsoknown as Papo, also known as Papo Biombo, also known as PapoBlue Moon, also known as El Brujo; Ismael Pastrana, alsoknown as Ismael Pastrana-Delgado, also known as JuniorPastrana, also known as Junior Grasa; Miguel Millan, alsoknown as Miguel Millan-Silva, also known as Mickey Millan,also known as Maneco; Manuel
Gonzalez v. Ysleta Independent School Districtpublic domain
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: This appeal raises difficult questions of law in a difficult, tragic setting. Jessica Gonzalez was sexually molested by Andres Mares, her first grade teacher, while attending one of the elementary schools within the Ysleta Independent School District. After Jessica’s parents, Gloria and Victor Gonzalez, discovered that the YISD Board of Tr
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. A group of employees filed class and collective actions against Tyson Foods, Inc., seeking unpaid wages for time spent on pre- and post-shift activities. After the employees obtained a sizeable verdict and fee award, 1 Tyson unsuccessfully moved for judgment as a matter of law. On appeal, Tys
United States v. Torrespublic domain
CALABRESI, Circuit Judge: This case focuses primarily on the boundaries of the trial judge’s discretion to excuse prospective jurors for cause. It asks us to consider under what circumstances a trial judge may either presume or infer bias on the part of a venireperson without explicitly asking whether he or she could apply the law impartially. It is well-settled in our circuit that judges must presu
in Re: Thomas Lytle and Ellen Lytlepublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-15-00216-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/3/2015 2:56:56 PM
Paine v. Johnsonpublic domain
689 F.Supp.2d 1027 (2010) Kathleen PAINE, as Guardian of the Estate of Christina Rose Eilman, a Disabled Person, Plaintiff, v. Officer Jeffrey JOHNSON, Officer Richard Cason, Officer Rosendo Moreno, Lieutenant Carson Earnest, Sergeant David Berglind, Detention Aide Sharon Stokes, Officer Teresa Williams, Detention Aide Cynthia Hudson, Detention Aide Catonia Quinn, Officer Deborah Mabery, Officer Pamela Smith, Officer Benita Miller, Officer Paulin
Mary Ann Castro v. Manuel Castropublic domain
In the Fourth Court Of Appeals Fourth Court Of Appeals District San Antonio Texas Bexar County Maryann Castro v. Manuel Castro Re: Court Of Appeals Number: 04-14-00785-CV Trial Court Case 2011 -CI-15957 To The Fourth Court of Justices In Appeals Court STATEMEN
Frymire v. Ampex Corp.public domain
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. I. Introduction Frymire and eighty-four other employees (“Plaintiffs”) of Ampex Corporation (“Am-pex”) brought this action against Ampex, alleging violations of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (“WARN”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2109. The WARN Act requires large employers who are either closing a plant or instituting mass layoffs to provide sixty-days advance notice to
Vargas, Victor Jamespublic domain
PD-0229-15 No. __________________ __________________________________________ In the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals _______________________________________ Victor James Vargas Appellant, v. March 2, 2015 The State of Texas
Chevron Corp. v. Donzigerpublic domain
768 F.Supp.2d 581 (2011) CHEVRON CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Steven DONZIGER et al., Defendants. No. 11 Civ. 0691(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 7, 2011. *592 Randy M. Mastro, Andrea E. Neuman, Scott A. Edelman, Kristen L. Hendricks, William E. Thompson, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, for Plaintiff.