Cases

Klos Constr., Inc. v. Premier Homes & Props., LLC, 2020 NCBC 53. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER 18 CVS 3078 KLOS CONSTRUCTION, INC., Individually and on behalf of PREMIER HOMES AND PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PREMIER HOMES AND ORDER AND OPINION ON CROSS- PROPERTIES, LLC; ALPAT

344 S.C. 194 (2001) 544 S.E.2d 38 Susan OLSON, Appellant/Respondent, v. FACULTY HOUSE OF CAROLINA, INC., and the University of South Carolina, Defendants, South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, Intervener, of whom Faculty House of Carolina, Inc. is Respondent/Appellant, and The University of South Carolina is, Respondent. No. 3289. Court of Appeals of

553 F.3d 340 (2009) Barbara FORRESTER; Gary Forrester, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PENN LYON HOMES, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Penn Lyon Homes Corporation; PLH Erectors, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellants, and Fowler Homes, LLC, a Virginia Limited Liability Company, Defendant. No. 07-2171. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: December 2, 2008. Dec

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0124p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT GARY B., JESSIE K., CRISTOPHER R., ISAIAS R., ┐ ESMERALDA V., PAUL M., and JAIME R., minors, │ Plaintiffs-Appellants, │

Acting Chief Justice, HEARN. This case is a consolidation of five separate lawsuits instituted by county administrators and registers of deeds in Allen-dale, Beaufort, Colleton, Hampton, and Jasper Counties (collectively, Respondents) against MERSCORP Holdings, Inc.; Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, Inc. (MERS); and numerous banking institutions (collectively, Petitioners). Respondents contend Petitioners have engage

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

995 F.Supp. 190 (1998) Susan ROSENBERG, Plaintiff, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. and John Wyllys, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 96-12267-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 26, 1998. Steven T. Sager, Marc Redlich, Law Offices of Marc Redlich, Boston, MA, Richard P. Goodkin, Framingham, MA, for Susan M. Rosenberg. Barry Y.

Bridge, J. — The respondents in these consolidated cases seek access to accident reports and other materials and data held by the local government petitioners relating to the traffic history of the sites of their subject car accidents. Petitioners claim that all accident reports are nondiscoverable, since RCW 46.52.080 declares them “confidential” and inadmissible. Petitioners also contend that all the materials and data

31 P.3d 628 (2001) 144 Wash.2d 696 Ignacio GUILLEN, as legal guardian for Jennifer Guillen and Alma Guillen, minors; and Mariano Guillen, as legal guardian for Paulina Guillen and Fatima Guillen, Respondents, v. PIERCE COUNTY, a municipal corporation, Petitioner. The Estate of Clementina Guillen-Alejandre, Defendant, Robert and LuAnn Whitmer, husband and wife, individually, and as the guardians of Shanna Whitmer, a

PER CURIAM. This case involves challenges to the most recent reforms of electric transmission planning and cost allocation adopted by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission pursuant to the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. § 791 a et seq. In Order No. 1000, as reaffirmed and clarified in Order Nos. 1000-A and 1000-B (together, “the Final Rule”), the Commission requi

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DZ RESERVE; CAIN MAXWELL, No. 22-15916 DBA Max Martialis, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 3:18-cv-04978-JD v. OPINION META PLATFORMS, INC., FKA Facebook, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO STAY STEPHANIW. HUMRICKHOUSE, Bankruptcy Judge. The matter before the court is the Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, to Stay Based on Arbitration Agreement filed by defendants Bank of America, N.A. (“BOA”) and Jonathan P. Joyner (“Joyner”). A hearing was held in Raleigh, North Carolina, on June 5, 2012. BACKGROUND</

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) C.A. No.: N21C-08-063 EMD ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA23-593 Filed 20 February 2024 New Hanover County, No. 19-CVS-1668 CAPE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., DESMOND P. MCHUGH and wife, GERALDINE MCHUGH, MICHAEL L. BODNAR and wife, PATRICIA L. BODNAR, DONNA J. MARTIN and spouse, PETER MARTIN, Plaintiffs, v. SOUTHERN DESTINY, LLC, Defendant. Appeal by Proposed Intervenor-Defendant from order entered

449 B.R. 860 (2011) In re FREEWAY FOODS OF GREENSBORO, INC., Debtor. Jane H. Walter, Plaintiff, v. Freeway Foods, Inc., Freeway Foods of Greensboro, Inc., Gary M. Fly, individually, Lynne R. Fly, individually, Yellow Sign, Inc., and Waffle House, Inc., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 10-11282, Adversary No. 10-02057. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina, Greensboro Division.

ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV

HUNTER, JR., ROBERT N., Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant appeals from Orders entered 18 January 2012, 20 March 2014, 21 July 2014, and 16 November 2017 in which Judge James L. Gale, Chief Special Superior Court Judge for Complex Business Cases, in Superior Court, Brunswick County, granted Defendants' motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment and dismissed the case. We affirm.

Constr. Managers, Inc. v. Amory, 2019 NCBC 31. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAYNE 18 CVS 1359 CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS, INC. OF GOLDSBORO; CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS, LLC; ACTS CONTRACTING, INC.; and ACTS INVESTMENTS, LLC, ORDER AND OPINION ON Plaintiffs,

Leahy, J. This appeal concerns Maryland’s power to exercise personal jurisdiction over a company headquartered in Texas, as well as the out-of-state directors of another company that was incorporated in Maryland and headquartered in Texas. All relevant activity leading to the merger of companies challenged in

GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judge. In this unusual case, Appellant Clientron Corp. is actually the prevailing party below and holds a judgment against Appellee Devon IT, Inc. worth over $7 million. Clientron claims, however, that it is unable to recover because Devon IT is insolvent.