Cases

Karen LeCraft Henderson, Circuit Judge: *149 Gary Cooper (not that one) was convicted of five counts for his role in a scheme to steal from a labor union. Counts One and Two both charged conspiracy under

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Mar 19 2019, 9:47 am court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral CLERK Indiana Supreme Court

PER CURIAM. In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent (Agreement) pursuant to Rule 21 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). In the Agreement, respondent admits mis

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00266-CV IN RE GARY COOPER NORTON, JR. RELATOR ------------ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1

02-12-266-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 6, 2010 Session GARY COOPER v. CLINTON UTILITIES BOARD Appeal from the Circuit Court for Anderson County No. A7LA0655 Hon. Donald R. Elledge, Judge No. E2009-01734-COA-R3-CV - FILED JULY 23, 2010 Plaintiff brought this action, charging defendant utility breached its contract with plaintiff

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON AUGUST SESSION, 1997 FILED GARY L. COOPER, ) September 10, 1997 ) No. 02C01-9610-CC-00334 Appellant ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. ) LAKE COUNTY Appellate C ourt Clerk vs.

03/22/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 13, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RONALD LYONS, JAMES MICHAEL USINGER, LEE HAROLD CROMWELL, AUSTIN GARY COOPER, AND CHRISTOPHER ALAN HAUSER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County Nos. 2017-A-79; 2

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION Appellate case name: Gary M. Cooper v. Wyoming Cooper-Clifton Appellate case number: 01-20-00476-CV Trial court case number: 2017-62396 Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris County Date motion filed: March 29, 2022 Party filing motion: Appellant The en banc c

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING Appellate case name: Gary M. Cooper v. Wyoming Cooper-Clifton Appellate case number: 01-20-00476-CV Trial court case number: 2017-62396 Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris County Date motion filed: March 29, 2022 Party filing motion: Appellant It is ordered tha

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER Appellate case name: Gary M. Cooper v. Wyoming Cooper-Clifton Appellate case numbers: 01-20-00476-CV Trial court case number: 2017-62396 Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris County Appellant, Gary M. Cooper, has filed a second motion for extension of time to file his motion for rehearing and

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED GARY BATTEN, December 6, 2024 ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK Defendant Below, Petitioner INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

Affirmed.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT GARY EWERS, GERRI McGIGHAN-LUKENS, OXYLIFE RESPIRATORY SERVICES, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company, Appellants, v. SCOTT HERMAN and CRAIG COOPER directly and derivatively, on behalf of OXYLIFE RESPIRATORY SERVICES, LLC,

397 S.C. 339 (2012) 725 S.E.2d 491 In the Matter of Kenneth Gary COOPER, Respondent. No. 27116. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard February 9, 2012. Decided April 25, 2012. *340 Lesley M. Coggiola, Disciplinary Counsel, and C. Tex Davis, Jr., Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, both of Colu

ORDER By order dated April 25, 2012, the Court suspended respondent from the practice of law for six (6) months and ordered he pay the costs of the disciplinary proceedings, $895.71, within thirty (30) days. In the Matter of Cooper, 397 S.C. 339, 725 S.E.2d 491 (2012). The Court further ordered respondent to enter into a three (3) year monitoring contract with Lawyers Helping Lawyers within thirty (30) days, and to file quart

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Wright, J.), dated January 13, 2003, which, inter alia, denied his motion for telephone visitation with the parties’ child. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Contrary to the father’s contention, the Family Court properly denied his motion on procedura

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act articles 6 and 8, the father appeals from an order of protection of the Family Court, Kings County (Wright, J.), dated June 28, 2002, which, inter alia, directed that he stay away from the mother and the child except for court-ordered visitation. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The order of protection appealed from expired by its own ter

ORDER The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.