Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
9 opinions for “G.F. Kelly Trucking, Inc. v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.”
Dimingo v. Midnight Xpress, Inc.public domain
Robert N. Scola, Jr., United States District Judge This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff Eduardo E. Dimingo's ("Dimingo") motion for partial summary judgment and the Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Upon review of the record, the parties' briefs, and the relevant legal authorities, the Court grants the Defendants' motion (ECF No. 54) and denies Dimingo's motion
in Re: Giant Eagle, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS
Thompto v. Coborn's Inc.public domain
871 F.Supp. 1097 (1994) Tressa A. THOMPTO, Plaintiff, v. COBORN'S INCORPORATED, Defendant. No. C 93-3046. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. November 23, 1994. *1098 *1099 *1100 *1101
Hoffner v. Lanctoepublic domain
YOUNG, C.J. Michigan, being above the 42nd parallel of north latitude, is prone to winter. And with winter comes snow and ice accumulations on sidewalks, parking lots, roads, and other outdoor surfaces. Unfortunately, the accumulation of snow, ice, and other slippery hazards on surfaces regularly traversed by the citizens of this state results in innumerable mishaps and injuries each year. This case tests the extent of a premise
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
State v. Harringtonpublic domain
Kosicki, J. The defendant was convicted on four counts in an information charging him with the illegal operation of a promotional drawing, in violation of § 53-290, and from the sentence he has appealed. The statute reads as follows: “Lotteries prohibited; publication of promotional drawing. Any person, except a sponsoring organization holding a permit under the provisions of sections 7-170 to 7-186, inclusive, who sets up any l
ACCEPTED 03-15-00113-CV 5989837 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/8/2015
United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.public domain
629 P.2d 231 (1980) 96 N.M. 155 UNITED NUCLEAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, and Indiana & Michigan Electric Co., Defendant-Appellee. UNITED NUCLEAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, and Indiana & Michigan Electric Company, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 11988, 12052.