Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “G & R Feed and Grain Co., Inc.”
184 B.R. 52 (1995) MERCHANTS GRAIN, INC., By and Through Receiver, Edmund M. MAHERN, Appellant, v. Mark ADKINS, et al., Appellees. In re MERCHANTS GRAIN, INC., By and Through Receiver, Edmund M. MAHERN. MERCHANTS GRAIN, INC., By and Through Receiver, Edmund M. MAHERN, Plaintiff, v. Mark ADKINS, et al., Defendants. Cause No. IP 95-0030-C-M/S. Bankruptcy No. 91-5047-RMV-7A. Adv. No. 93-0114.
Farmers Feed & Grain Company, Inc. v. Wayne Mladypublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA _______________ No. 25-0376 Filed February 25, 2026 _______________ Farmers Feed & Grain Company, Inc., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant–Appellee, v. Wayne Mlady, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff–Appellant. _______________
Durk DeBoer v. Attebury Grain, LLCpublic domain
Opinion filed January 25, 2024 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-22-00107-CV __________ DURK DEBOER, Appellant V. ATTEBURY GRAIN, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 266th District Court
The Andersons, Inc. v. Fall Grain, Inc.public domain
646 F.Supp.2d 1029 (2009) THE ANDERSONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. FALL GRAIN, INC., Defendant. No. 09-CV-2060. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division. August 18, 2009. *1030 Richard A. Wunderlich, Steven D. Hall, Lewis, Rice & Fingersh, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff. Christopher L. Gallinari, Bellows &a;
96 B.R. 755 (1989) In re MAYVILLE FEED & GRAIN, INC., Debtor. Duane La BAIR, Mitchell La Bair, George McMullen, Bob Steele d/b/a Steele Dairy Farm, Edmond Stephens and Edward Stephens, Gerald Stout, Keith Tedford, Wildrex Thornton, Harold White, Daniel Day, Mark Stout and Bernard Cobb, Plaintiffs, v. MAYVILLE FEED & GRAIN, INC., State of Michigan, Department of Agriculture, and Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Company, Defendants.
641 F.Supp.2d 1167 (2009) JOHNSTOWN FEED & SEED, INC., Wayne Spreng, and Rhonda Spreng, Plaintiffs, v. CONTINENTAL WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-cv-00290-MSK-CBS. United States District Court, D. Colorado. March 5, 2009. *1170 Asher M.B. Ritmiller, Christopher Lynn Ingold, Irwin & Boesen, P.C.,
Chariton Feed and Grain, Inc. v. Harderpublic domain
REYNOLDSON, Chief Justice. We granted further review in this appeal to determine whether trial court erred in holding a landlord under the usual stock-share lease liable to a livestock feed supplier on the theories of partnership, agency and unjust enrichment. The court of appeals split three to three, hence the trial court’s decision stood affirmed by operation of law. We vacate the court of appeals disposition and reverse
Harvey Vorwerk, by and Through His Representative Jane Vorwerk v. Williamson County Grain, Inc.public domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00549-CV Harvey Vorwerk, deceased, by and through his representative Jane Vorwerk, Appellant
Harvey Vorwerk, by and Through His Representative Jane Vorwerk v. Williamson County Grain, Inc.public domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00549-CV Harvey Vorwerk, deceased, by and through his representative Jane Vorwerk, Appellant v. Williamson County Grain, Inc., Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 08-1072-C26, HONORABLE BILLY RAY STUBBLEFIELD, JUDGE PRESIDING MEM
James Valley Grain, LLC v. Davidpublic domain
CROTHERS, Justice. [¶ 1] Loren David appeals the district court’s judgment confirming the arbitration panel’s award of damages to James Valley Grain, LLC. David argues the district court erred by confirming the arbitration decision because a valid arbitration agreement does not exist, the arbitration agreement was unconscionable and the arbitration panel failed to properly apply the law and arbitration rules. James Valley ar
OPINION NELDAV. RODRIGUEZ, Justice This suit' concerns tax liability for a sizeable quantity of grain. Appellant Sebastian Cotton & Grain, Ltd. (Sebastian) contends that the grain was owned by De-Bruce Grain, Inc. (DeBruee), which should therefore be liable for taxes on the grain. Appellee, the Willacy County Appraisal District (WCAD or District), contends that Sebastian was the majority owner. The admin
Southern States Cooperative, Inc. v. Townsend Grain & Feed Co. (In Re L. B. Trucking, Inc.)public domain
163 B.R. 709 (1994) In the Matter of L.B. TRUCKING, INC., Double D Farms, Inc., Dudley B. Durham, Jr. and Barbara L. Durham, Debtors. SOUTHERN STATES COOPERATIVE, INCORPORATED, t/a Southern States Middletown Service Cooperative, a corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Plaintiff, v. TOWNSEND GRAIN AND FEED COMPANY, a corporation of the State of Delaware, Dudley B. Durham, Jr., and Barbara L. Durham, Defendants. Ban
BOUDIN, Chief Judge. We have before us an application by the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board” or “NLRB”) for enforcement of the order it issued against a grain processing company, Pan American.1 Pan American cross-petitions to set aside portions of the Board’s order. Pan American is a Puerto Rican company that manufactures animal feed and processes rice for human con
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 15-0347 Filed December 9, 2015 KEITH SMITH COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, vs. DUANE BUSHMAN and SHIRLEY BUSHMAN, Defendants-Appellants, and FARMER GROWN POULTRY, LLC; DUANE BUSHMAN; SHIRLEY BUSHMAN; BUSHMAN ORGANIC GRAINS, INC.; BUSHMAN ORGANIC FARMS f/k/a Bushman Family Farms; BUSHMAN ORGANIC POULTRY; and ORGANIC FEED AND GRAINS, LLC; D
Northern Grain Marketing, LLC v. Marvin Grevingpublic domain
SYKES, Circuit Judge. Marvin Greving has lived and farmed in southeastern Wisconsin since April 1971. In 2003 he began contracting to sell his grain to Northern Grain Marketing, LLC, an Illinois-based grain buyer. Northern Grain claims that Greving repudiated several contracts formed years after the parties first began contracting and seeks almost $1 million in damages from him. W
Botkins Grain & Feed Co. v. Lindleypublic domain
Brogan, J. The sole issue in this cause is whether appellee is a construction contractor with respect to the sales of livestock capsules. R.C. 5741.02(A) imposes an excise tax “on the storage, use or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property.” However, pursuant to R.C. 5741.02(C)(2), this tax is not applicable to property, the acquisition of which, if made in this state, would not be subje
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 22–0259 Submitted February 21, 2024—Filed April 19, 2024 BRIAN HORA AND GREGG HORA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF HORA FARMS, INC., AND PRECISION PARTNERS, CORP., Appellants, vs. KEITH HORA AND KURT HORA, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR CAPACITY AS SHAREHOLDERS, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, MANAGERS, AND EMPLOYEES OF HORA FARMS, INC., HEATHER HORA, AND HK FARMS, INC., Appellants.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 22–0259 Submitted February 21, 2024—Filed April 19, 2024 BRIAN HORA and GREGG HORA, Individually and on Behalf of HORA FARMS, INC., and PRECISION PARTNERS, CORP., Appellants, vs. KEITH HORA and KURT HORA, Individually and in Their Capacity as Shareholders, Directors, Officers, Managers, and Employees of HORA FARMS, INC., HEATHER HORA, and HK FARMS, INC., Appellees.
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. The recent proliferation of so-called “hedge-to-arrive” contracts for the sale of grain has pitted many American farmers against their counterparts in the grain storage and marketing industry. The case before us involves these contracts, and these players, but it also wends its way into questions of arbitration and attorney’s fees. A familiarity with hedge