Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Fuqua v. FBI”
Douglas Fuqua v. Brett Turnerpublic domain
USCA11 Case: 19-13877 Date Filed: 05/06/2021 Page: 1 of 32 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-13877 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:17-cv-01911-LCB DOUGLAS FUQUA,
Fuqua v. Statepublic domain
183 Ga. App. 414 (1987) 359 S.E.2d 165 FUQUA v. THE STATE. 74347. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided June 9, 1987. Rehearing Denied June 23, 1987. J. Hue Henry, Martha M. Pearson, for appellant. Harry N. Gordon, District Attorney, Gerald W. Brown, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. BIRDSO
Fuqua Television, Inc. v. Flemingpublic domain
134 Ga. App. 731 (1975) 215 S.E.2d 694 FUQUA TELEVISION, INC. v. FLEMING. FUQUA TELEVISION, INC. v. BLANCHARD. FUQUA TELEVISION, INC. v. BARTON. FUQUA TELEVISION, INC. v. NICHOLSON. 50498, 50499, 50500, 50501. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Argued April 7, 1975. Decided April 23, 1975. Fulcher, Hagler
Pitts v. Statepublic domain
Cite as 2016 Ark. 345 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-80-40 EUGENE ISSAC PITTS Opinion Delivered October 20, 2016 PETITIONER PETITION TO REINVEST THE V. CIRCUIT COURT WITH JURISDICTION IN O
Winslow v. Statepublic domain
315 Ga. 133 FINAL COPY S22A0498. WINSLOW v. THE STATE. BETHEL, Justice. William Sanford Winslow was convicted on four counts of sexual exploitation of children in connection with his possession of two videos depicting children engaged in sexually explicit conduct. The videos were found on his laptop computer by law enforcement. On appeal, Winslow raises three enumerations of error: (1) the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained f
Winslow v. Statepublic domain
SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA November 2, 2022 The Honorable Supreme Court met pursuant to adjournment. The following order was passed: Upon consideration, the Court has revised the deadline for motions for reconsideration in this matter. It is ordered that a motion for reconsideration, if any, including motions submitted via the Court’s electronic filing system, must be received in the Clerk’s Office by 2 p.m. on Wedn
Randy William Gay v. State of Arkansaspublic domain
Cite as 2022 Ark. 23 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-21-202 Opinion Delivered: February 10, 2022 RANDY WILLIAM GAY APPEAL FROM THE GARLAND APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 26CR-11-428] V.
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as Jul 21 2015, 6:43 am precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Terry A. White G
Randy William Gay v. State of Arkansaspublic domain
Cite as 2022 Ark. 23 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-21-202 Opinion Delivered: February 10, 2022 RANDY WILLIAM GAY APPEAL FROM THE GARLAND APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 26CR-11-428] V.
Marcus Thurman Wade v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
05/11/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 12, 2020 MARCUS THURMAN WADE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Coffee County No. 44130 L. Craig Johnson, Judge ___________________________________
United States v. Baltimore Museum of Artpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION LEONIE M. BRINKEMA, District Judge. Before the Court is claimant Baltimore Museum of Art’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated in open court and in this Memorandum Opinion, the motion will be granted, and claimant Marcia Fuqua’s Claim to Property and Cross-Claim will be dismissed. I. BACKGROUND The subject of this
Britton v. Office of the Att'y Gen.public domain
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'05- 11:03:36 2019.01.23 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXIC
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DEBORAH PETTRY and GAIL ) FRIEDT, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0132-KSJM ) GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) RICHARD C. COLLINS, )
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DEBORAH PETTRY and GAIL ) FRIEDT, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0132-KSJM ) GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) RICHARD C. COLLINS, )
Watson v. Tennessee Department of Safetypublic domain
361 S.W.3d 549 (2011) Bob Keith WATSON v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY. No. M2010-02193-COA-R3-CV. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section, at Nashville. May 3, 2011 Session. September 30, 2011. Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court February 16, 2012. *550 William Kennerly Burger,
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2118-16T2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION v. May 26, 2021 APPELLATE DIVISION MICHELLE LODZINSKI, D
State of Tennessee v. Marcus Thurman Wadepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 11, 2015 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARCUS THURMAN WADE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Coffee County No. 38,622 L. Craig Johnson, Judge No. M2014-01418-CCA-R3-CD – Filed September 28, 2016 A jury in the Coffee County Circuit Court found the Appellant, Marcus Thurman Wade, guilty o
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. Michelle Lodzinski (A-50-19) (083398) Argued October 27, 2020 -- Decided May 26, 2021 PER CURIAM JUSTICE PATTERSON filed a concurrence, joined by JU
Mitchell v. Commonwealthpublic domain
STUMBO, Justice. Timothy Taylor Mitchell was convicted of two counts of first-degree rape, two counts of complicity to first-degree rape, three counts of first-degree sodomy, one count of complici*101ty to first-degree sodomy, one count of first-degree sexual abuse, two counts of kidnapping, one count of second-degree burglary, one count of third-degree burglary, and
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. State v. Michelle Lodzinski (A-50-19) (083398) Argued October 27, 2020 -- Decided May 26, 2021 PER CURIAM JUSTICE PATTERSON filed a concurrence, joined by JU